Label Me “In Christ”

jaj 09-21-2013 001 - R1

 

You could read this “Danger” sign at face value, decide to heed its warning and not take your canoe over the dam. Or, you could read the sign as an inconvenience, as someone telling you what to do. You have the freedom to ignore the warning. The consequences still pay out in full.

 There are signs everywhere informing our decisions. We make choices based on past experience and present warnings. We may proceed or we may stop and change course.

 Signs just give us the information. And again, we may trust the sign and heed its warning. Or, we may disregard the sign and all credible evidence and choose to go forward, knowing full well that there will most likely be consequences. In this case, I would take the path most chosen… by wise people. I would go directly ashore after reading the sign.

 Seeing this “Danger”sign today as I walked along the river I was reminded of several critical thinking dialogues I have engaged in. Like the river sign, there were warning signs or red flags that the discussion I was having, the canoe trip, would soon require a commitment to the truth at hand.

Often in these dialogues the person I am conversing with will begin dismissing out of hand anything I say that is contrary to their zeitgeist. My position is considered without merit, without ‘value’ in their eyes, based on their already altered life. They soon begin repeating the party line phrases they’ve heard others in their hive repeat.

As the communication between the two ships “passing in the night” nears, the “Danger” sign of truth I am quickly identified as a Kool-Aid drinker,” as too stupid and no longer human enough to understand that the sign is “more unconventional than life itself and not in keeping with what people really should think.” I am often told that the sign can not be accepted at face value since science has proved otherwise. 

From being dehumanized I am then in turn objectified. Now, any human experience I could share that would quickly prove the “Danger” sign to be absolutely valid is deemed as just morally relative existentialist personal experience. Accordingly, in this person’s worldview, there can be no Absolute Truth when ‘feelings’ are on the line. To them only subjective feelings (now called ‘rights”) matter. The feelings of others may or may not matter depending on whether you are “in” or “out”.

As the conversation continues the Skull and Crossbones is raised to threaten me, to keep me at bay. The broadsides begin. I am broadsided with labels.

 

Labels? Why labels?

 Socially, for the sake of “diversity;” paying homage for their vice to virtue.

 And, labels give the ‘Socially Privileged’ the means to socially profile someone even though they supposedly “hate profiling” (i.e., SPLC).

 Inordinate labels give all sorts of people ‘outs’ and disclaimers.

 Drive-by labeling allows the hive-minded self-described “diverse” to avoid the truth and, more importantly, enables them to avoid bearing individual responsibility for the mal-effects of their broad brush labeling via tweets, social programs, ‘right’s agendas, discriminatory government policies and public education (reprogramming) all of which defines who is ‘in’ and who is ‘out’ under the Mad magazine-like masthead of “Diversity Means Inclusive: “What-me-Worry?””

 Labeling enables moronic activism and anti-social behavior (i.e., White Privilege Conference). The ‘Labelers’ label the ‘other’ as ‘bad’ ~ he/she is not one of us ~ invoking God-like privilege.

 Today, being “diverse” means that you can appear all-wise “inclusive” with your ‘peeps’ by excluding, denigrating and literally hating people based on labels.

 Talk to a homosexual about their homosexuality. You can’t because you are labeled “homophobic.”

 Consider this recent tweet conversation between @witycindy and @torqueflite a same-sex marriage devotee.

 

 

When all was said and done Cindy Wity @witycindy was labeled “homophobic”, a “hater”, a “Kool-Aid” drinker, a “bigot,” “a pathetic wretch”. (They labeled Christ, too. @witycindy is in Good Company.)

 I believe that you can read the whole conversation for yourself on twitter. (BTW: I made screen capture pdfs of @torqueflite’s public tweets just in case they are erased.)

 There are many topics where labeling is used to abort meaningful conversations. Of course politics is one of them.

 You can’t disagree with Obama’s fiscal, domestic or regulatory policies, his back door fiats or his lack of coherent foreign policy without being labeled “racist.” You are considered a “racist” solely for not ‘accepting’ the half-black Obama’s total incompetence, his deception or his distaste of America carte blanche.

Labeling is meant to dehumanize the ‘other,’ creating an object of derision.

Hitler labeled the Jews “Undesirables.”

Stalin labeled those who peasants who did not want to participate in collectivism as “kulaks.”

“They often used the term to label anyone who had more property than was considered “normal,” according to subjective criteria, and personal rivalries played a part in the classification of enemies. Historian Robert Conquest argues:

The land of the landlords had been spontaneously seized by the peasantry in 1917-18. A small class of richer peasants with around fifty to eighty acres had then been expropriated by the Bolsheviks. Thereafter a Marxist conception of class struggle led to an almost totally imaginary class categorization being inflicted in the villages, where peasants with a couple of cows or five or six acres more than their neighbors were now being labeled “kulaks,” and a class war against them declared. (from Wikipedia)”

This labeling sounds a lot like a Barrack Obama’s political campaign of labeling the ‘wealthy’ as the “1%” and Christian gun owners as ”bitter clingers” ~ all sounding as if pulled from Saul Alinsky’s style book: “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.

 Labels? Why labels?

 The religion of moral relativity or ‘Diversity’ is evangelistic. With its labels and bumper stickers it preaches to us, telling us to “COEXIST” in a world where you are now ‘redirected’ to be PC, to say what you do not believe and can never question under the tyranny of moral relativism. My Lord is nothing like this.

 ***

If you believe in a god who accepts everything you do and denies you nothing would this god be a good parent or a Good Shepherd? In truth, such a god is a man-made idol created in keeping with a self-generated belief system, a belief system labeled as “Diversity.”

Like the “Danger-Dam” sign there are plenty of God’s Signs and Wonders pointing us away from sin and darkness and the wide path leading to destruction. Labeling others, as was shown above, is used to tear down those signs.

 Labeling, again, as shown above, dismisses by verbal abuse and bullying the most important of conversations, those that involve truth: “Did God really say…” and “Truth. What is truth?” The Evil One does NOT want this conversation to happen. The Evil One would rather crucify the One with Truth.

 Label me “In Christ” and willing to discourse about truth.

Added:

Stop the label machine! Here is an article from the Illinois Review website: University of Chicago Students offended by Gay Rights Activists Use of a Transphobic Slur!

For more about God’s Signs and Wonders and His natural law placed in the soul of man read Human Rights Repository.

 For more about inordinate labeling read The People of the “White Privilege” Lie.

 For information regarding the characteristics of evil read “Hell is Empty and All The Devils Are Here.”

Homosexuality’s True Colors

Don’t believe the soft sell propaganda you see on TV about homosexuality.  Homosexuality is all about protecting the individual’s narcissism. Homosexuals do not care about anyone but themselves. But don’t take my word for this.  Watch the video.  What you’ll see is indicative of the homosexual community at large and it’s not much different from the skin heads who also spew hate and those who bully others.

Cause and Effect: No Margin for Error

Read first:

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2011/07/05/india-health-minister-calls-homosexuality-disease/?test=latestnews

Certainly the spread of HIV/AIDS in India, Africa, the US and throughout the world is, for the most part, due to unrestrained homosexual activity, activity promoted by the homosexual community. The proliferation of HIV/AIDS does not come from marginalization.

Yet, as seen in the above article, the Indian homosexual advocate Anjali Gopalan does not address the cause of HIV/AIDS.  He, in instead, blames the homosexual’s supposed marginalization as the reason that HIV/AIDs treatments are not happening fast enough to keep pace with the unnatural sexual activity.

Anjali offers two points countering the health minister’s statement that homosexuality is an unnatural disease: the marginalization of the homosexual and the need for community building. He does not address, of course, the prevention of AIDS.  Instead, Anjali deflects the problem on to others, seeking to shame them and to make them responsible for homosexuals not having HIV/AIDS treatments readily available. There is no mention by Anjali as to why the disease continues to be pervasive in the homosexual community.

News Flash:  HIV/AIDS marginalizes people through its own destructive means.  Social marginalization does not cause HIV/AIDS in a person.  Lack of self control on the part of the homosexual causes the spread of HIV/AIDS. Does anyone not believe this?

Other than having received a tainted blood transfusion or having had sex with an unfaithful partner, HIV/AIDS is a self-induced disease. You do know this don’t you?

Further, homosexuality does not lend itself to community building and certainly not through the reproduction of its citizens. Homosexuality marginalizes its practitioners into a group which practices unnatural sex, apart from the rest of society.  A community, diseased from within with homosexuality, will soon destroy itself, much like HIV/AIDS destroys the immune system of the one who has permitted it to come in.

The above article shows us once again that the homosexual community’s projection of its own lack of caring (consider the obvious transmission of AIDS from one person to the next) and its own need to feed its sense of self onto the healthy community is typical of narcissism.

You watch the news. Homosexuality gives nothing back to the community.  It only demands and takes.  An activist will tell us that will have “Diversity.”  Diversity was around long before homosexual community took over its meaning.  Diversity in the past was often used, with  positive connotations, to mean a choice of options or variety.  But the term has now been obfuscated to mean having homosexuality around as a good thing. Diversity now means a variety of what? Of sexual options?  Of sexual partners? Of sexually transmitted diseases?  Of mental and emotional illnesses?

Certainly a diseased diversity adds nothing of value to our community.  Today, a “Diverse” community is one with homosexuals many of whom have HIV/AIDS – a horrible disease propagated over and over again by homosexuality itself, spread across a self-marginalizing group of people. These people were once part of a healthy community before they ever contracted HIV/AIDS, before they ever engaged in the act of homosexuality. We are told that this “Diversity” is a good thing by homosexual activists. (Accept it or be called a homophobe by their bullies).

Someone should tell Anjali that the spread of HIV/AIDS can be mitigated with the cessation of homosexual activity.  In other words, stop doing what is unnatural, stop spreading the disease. Control yourself and stop blaming others.

Believing a lie only marginalizes truth and makes us a community of dupes.

The Psuedo-Rainbow’s Bully Pulpit

As I have posted before, those with a homosexual life style addiction will often project their own feelings onto others. They will say that people are bullies with regard to their homosexual feelings while the exact opposite is true: The homosexual activist is ever the bully.

Recently I talked with two different people on two different occasions. In each case the other person turned the discussion to political matters. And, in each case I knew the person to be a Democrat. Each person stated unequivocally that they were fiscal conservatives but…they “could not understand why people would hate someone else.” Such is the spin, the projection, that homosexual ‘terrorists’ have put on to people who disagree with their homosexual lifestyle – they are called haters. Sadly, even religious groups like the Presbyterians, Episcopalians and Lutherans are buying into this propaganda for the sake of looking tolerant and accepting. I would guess , too, that these denominations need the financial support. Holiness is what they should be going after.

The homosexual turns to calling what he does a “right” to ensure that this particular kind of madness lies with in the purview of Democracy. For them, morality, the arbiter of a Democracy, is another thing all together. For the homosexual morality is not to be taken seriously.  Morality becomes “intolerance” in their milieu of permissiveness.

The supreme irony is that homosexual can readily judge, denounce and bully another person who disagrees with the lifestyle the homosexual embraces but the homosexual will never embrace the other person. This is because the other person embodies the truth – the light – that the homosexual does not want to be near. The homosexual will hide behind the taffeta skirts of political correctness language – the one-sided lingo of intolerance.

Homophobia: The homosexual’s fear of facing the truth about his lifestyle; the fear of an examined life.

Homo-lifers will bully you and be in your face until you throw up your hands and you say “OK”. They will not stop until you surrender on their terms. Blood-bank on it.

The bullies in black robes dept (click here>):  Did Judge’s Sexual Orientation Affect Ruling?