It Doesn’t Take Much

It was going to be another one of those Center City weekends. That’s what my gut told me when I rolled out of bed. That and fifteen years on the force.

Friday began with me sitting before a grand jury providing testimony and evidence about an abduction turned homicide. I was subpoenaed to present facts and findings so the jury could determine if there is probable cause to indict the suspect. When I return to the police station there is someone waiting to give me their testimony about what she thinks might be going on at her neighbor’s house.

Pearl Dowdy, an elderly woman with short grey hair, olive green eyes, and large dark-rimmed glasses that make her large hawk nose look fake, is very concerned.

“Detective, I watch that house every day. Every night. Lights are flashing. Things are being carried out in tarps late at night. Noise. Oh, my Lord, the noise.”

“Ma’am, I’m a homicide detective. if you haven’t witnessed any crime I can’t get involved.”

“There’s something bad going on over there. I just know it and so does Winston.”

“Who’s Winston?”

“My dog. He knows when something is up.”

“Ma’am, I’ll send a patrol around to check on the noise.”

“You had better, Detective Winder. I think the husband is up to something.”

The whole time we’re talking, she is moving things on the front of my desk. When I put them back in place, Miss Dowdy gets up, yanks her sweater tight around her, and walks out.

Patrolwoman Majorie Lachance had been listening to the conversation.

“How did it go with Miss Marples?”

“That woman would indict a ham sandwich. You know, Lachance, if I had a licorice snap every time I interviewed someone convinced that they know something about a crime based on a theory of appearances and not facts, I’d have an empty bag of licorice snaps on my desk. Oh look. It’s empty. But hey, I just so happen to have backup.”

I pull another bag of snaps out of a box in the file cabinet. I offer the opened bag to Marjorie.

“I got a feeling that you’ll need all of them, Roy.”

~~~

3 AM the next morning Sarge is on the phone.

“But the wicked are like the tossing sea that cannot keep still; its waters toss up mire and mud. Roy, there’s a body in the Carnival of Souls haunted house.”

“A body not a prop?”

“A body. A female student. A freshman at CCC. “

~~~

Sarge tells me that there’s no rest for the wicked as they are forever tormented. But whatever is buried in the catacombs of Center City rises in October. Our metropolis becomes hell turned inside out when Halloween comes around. Tormented souls come out to play in the crisp autumn air.

I drive over to Carnival of Souls staged on an abandoned lot used by carnivals in the summer. The area is a forsaken corner of our grimy metropolis. It’s a virtual ghost town with boarded-up businesses, warehouses, and homes.

Outside the haunted house, students are laying flowers next to a picture of the deceased. The entrance has several signs: “YOUR HOME FOR HORROR” “BEWARE!” “YOU WANT TO BELIEVE.” I see no CCTV camera.

I cross under the police tape and into the barely lit cavern. I pass Dracula’s Portal, the Crypt, the Mummy’s Tomb, Frankenstein’s Lab, The Morgue, the Chamber of Torture, Wolf Man’s Forest, a graveyard with tombstones, a sordid mix of atrocities and figures of notorious criminals, and lots of fake blood and spider webs. The smell of smoke liquid from pyrotechnics is heavy in the air.

I come to the Execution Chamber staged with gallows, chopping block, a guillotine, and the body of a young woman.

CSI Mike shows me her driver’s license and student ID. The nineteen-year-old woman on the floor is Cheri Long.

“Cause of death?”

“By the horizontal and circumferential ligature marks on her neck, I’d say she was strangled. Her attacker came from behind based on the trauma to the back of the neck. This was personal.”

“Time of death?”

 “I’d say about the time this house of horrors was shutting down for the night. Around 2 AM.”

“Any sexual assault?”

“Not that I can see. The autopsy might reveal something.”

“I saw the same orange shirts on the women outside.”

“The Sparks? That’s the woman’s volleyball team at CC College. This was used to strangle her.”

Mike shows me the hemp rope taken down from the gallows in the Execution Chamber.

“Defensive wounds?”

“She has bruising and scratches on her arms. She likely struggled with her attacker. Some of her fingernails are broken. I took a sample of what was under her nails and grabbed the broken nail tips for testing. I’ll be testing the rope, too.”

“Any money or jewelry taken?”

“It doesn’t look like it. Her necklace, pocket book and phone are still here.”

I went outside to talk to the women behind the police tape.

“Does anyone here know what happened here tonight?”

A gaggle of women in red and gold teams shirts started talking all at once.

“Hold on ladies. One at a time.”

Patrolwoman Lachance pulled from the group a tall young woman with brown hair and red eyes.

“This is Senta. Cheri’s roommate.”

I brought Senta to my car to hear what she had to say.

“Cheri said a friend called her and asked her to go to the Carnival of Souls haunted house last night. Cheri said she didn’t like that sort of thing, but her friend kept asking her to go.”

“Did you meet her friend?”

“She came to our dorm room last night. Cheri introduced me to Jill.”

“Describer her.”

“She’s Asian. Maybe Japanese. She seemed to know Cheri. They left right after she arrived.”

“Do you know what time that was?”

“After midnight. I was up cramming for a pre-med test.”

“What was Cheri studying?”

“Drama. She auditioned and got the lead role for a play in December.”

“She’s wearing the same team shirt you are wearing. Was she on the volleyball team?”

“Oh, yeah. She’s the libero. She’s really good in that position. Our team is in the playoffs for the Women’s Volleyball Championship. The whole team is out here.”

I told Senta that I would get a warrant to search her dorm room. I asked her not to touch anything of Cheri’s. She understood and returned to the group.

I walked over to Patrolwoman Lachance.

“Who’s the butch doing the Italian Up Yours to us?

“That’s an angry queer feminist who doesn’t like the police and apparently herself.”

“What tipped you off ‘detective’ Lachance?”

“Her “Defund the Police” sign, her shaved chartreuse head atop her Sumo body, and her blast furnace mouth. I see what I see and report it. And over there, waiting for you to talk to them Roy, are the six characters who were working in the horror house tonight.”

She pointed to the Frankenstein monster, Dracula, the Mummy, the Wolf Man, the Slasher, and the Executioner.

“Hell is empty and all the devils are here, I see.”

“Speaking of devils, Roy, here comes the owner of this horror house.” He wants to know when he can reopen his Carnival of Souls.”

“Tell Dr. Frankenstein that his C-movie horror fantasies have gotten out of hand and we need to put some daylight on his Carnival. Tell him it will be down however long it takes. Tell him to bug off. Tell him whatever you want. I’m going to talk to the six jokers in costume.”

I put the six in a police lineup, in the order they appeared as one would see them as they went through Carnival of Souls. I questioned each one separately and took down the names of each.

Four of them said they saw two girls – a blond and an Asian girl – pass through. The Wolf Man said he scared the bejesus out of the two girls and they ran out to the next chamber. The Executioner, without his hood, is a severe looking man. He was made for the part. His sharp features matched his curt replies.

“You work in the execution chamber?”

“Yes.”

“Did you see what happened to the woman lying on the floor?

“No.”

“No?”

“No.”

“Patrolwoman Lachance will stake you to the station for a statement.”

I decided not to play hangman with gallows man.

~~~

I drive over to Howden Hall, the women’s dorm on the campus of Center City College. An RA is called down to escort me. When the elevator doors open on the fourth floor, the RA shouts “A man is on the floor!”

Women in towels scurry about. Doors close. Some women line the hallway, their lower lip pushed up and lip corners turned down, their eyelids drooping. They were mourning the death of one of their own.

The RA leads me to Cheri’s room. Senta is sitting on her bed reading what looks to be an anatomy book. I show her the search warrant.

“Hello detective. I left everything alone.”

“Thank you.”

“Cheri’s things are over there.”

On the wall above Cheri’s desk are photos of her family, her dog Rags, a group photo of the Sparks volleyball team, and a photo of Cheri and Jill. A class schedule and a drama rehearsal schedule are pinned to a bulletin board.

On her desk is a script for Ibsen’s Hedda Gabler. Cheri’s role as Hedda is highlighted in yellow.

Senta shows me the phone number of Cheri’s parents. They’ve been calling her because Cheri hadn’t responded to their calls. Senta told them about Cheri.

I tell Senta that I’ll go see them and assure them that we’re looking into their daughter’s murder.

~~~

Back at the station, Lachance tells me “Hoodless horse face” is in Interview room 1.

I sit down across from the long straight nose, the prominent jawline, and the large teeth of the medieval-looking executioner still in tunic, belt, gloves, and boot covers. He is smoothing his mouse-blond hair. The fact that he is grooming and moving around and racking in the swivel chair tells me he is anxious about being interviewed.

“Let’s see.” I thumb through my notes. “Mr. Orme is it?”

“I see that you can read.”

“I can even go to the bathroom by myself. Is the Executioner bit your full-time employment or do you just like to hang around death?”

“I am a theater professional. I’m Theater Director at CC.”

“Oh. I see. So, being executioner at Carnival of Souls is just a side show?”

“I bet you’ve never even seen a play have you dick?”

“My wife and I have season tickets at Doublehouse. Just saw the production of King Lear. And I have season tickets to executions, too.”

Orme’s tense face softened for a second and then regrouped into a tight formation.

“Mr. Orme, the lead for December’s play had been murdered and murdered in your chamber.”

“You’re not going to pin that on me, dick. Lots of people were coming through that place. Lots of drunk high people. Lots of goofed-up people under the influence were coming in and out last night.”

“This cold night will turn us all to fools and madmen.”

“Quote Lear all you want, you can’t pin this on me, dick.”

“You were at the scene of the crime. You didn’t see Cheri laying on the floor in your chamber?”

He swallowed hard. “At 2 AM the place was closing. I went out back for a smoke.”

“An “under the influence” smoke? You smell of weed.”

“No. A cigarette. It must have happened when I was outside.”

“And when you came in from your smoke, you must have seen the body of a young woman on the floor.”

“I saw a body on the floor face down with a noose around its neck. I thought it was put there for effect. I don’t produce this horror house.”

“You say you are a “theater professional.” Yet, you are working Carnival of Souls. Why is that?”

“This,” he addressed his costume with his hands,” is just, what did you call it? Oh yes, a side show. A macabre side show. I like the stage. I like to perform. I’m well respected in the arts as actor and director.”

“Could it be that ‘The prince of darkness is a gentleman!’?”

“C’mon detective. Cut out the Lear.”

“One can learn a lot about human nature from Shakespeare. More so than from any text book.”

The door opened. Lachance wanted a word with me.

“Hang tight, Mr. Orme.” I left the room. Lachance was waiting for me in the hallway.

“Roy, Jill is here for questioning. Room 2.”

~~~

Jill reminded me of a young Setsuko Hara, a Japanese actress called the Greta Garbo of Japan. I know this because long before I became a street cop and then a detective, I was a film student living with a Japanese roommate who liked Ozu’s Late Spring

“Jill, you asked Cheri to go with you to the Carnival of Souls. Is that correct?”

“Yes.”

“You and Cheri friends?

“In high school very close friends. Then she go to college.”

“You and Cheri walked through Carnival of Souls together?

“Yes.

“Did you see what happened to Cheri?”

“No. We go in together and we come out together. Someone outside say that the theater director was executioner. She go back in to talk to him.”

“Why did she want to talk to him?”

“She say she tell him no about them.”

“Did she go alone?”

“Yes. She not scare like me.”

Sitting across from Jill and the deep dark gaze of her almond-shaped eyes in a setting of a heart-shaped face, porcelain-like skin, straight black hair, and petite build – a combination of pure sweet girl and modern young woman in slim-fit jeans and oversized sweater – I wanted to believe that she couldn’t be guilty of anything. But having spent time in the make-believe world of film, I knew things are not what they appear to be.

I leave the room and find Lachance.

“Lachance, I’m pretty sure this guy Orme is under the influence of THC. He smells of weed and he’s looney tunes. Get him swabbed. Depending on the test results, his non answers, and the ME report, we may have probable cause to get a warrant for a blood test.

“Roy, what’s strange about Orme and Jill is that they don’t seem all that sad about what happened to Cheri. They seem more anxious than sad.”

“That’s what I see, ‘detective’ Lachance. Keep them here for now. Let them stew. Maybe they’re both in on it. We’ll see who breaks down first. I’m going over to Cheri’s parents to find out about Cheri and jill. I’ll be back in an hour.”

~~~

Mr. and Mrs. Harrison greet me at the door. They both look tired and lifeless.

“I very sorry for your loss.”

I ask about Cheri’s relationships – if anyone had a grudge against her. They said no. She was loved by everyone, they said.

“Tell me about Jill.”

Mr. Harrison showed me a photo of Cheri and Jill. He said that Jill was a foreign exchange student from Japan. “She’s been living with us for her high school education.”

Mrs. Harrison said that the two girls became very close during high school. She learned from Jill’s parents that extremely intimate relationships between school girls, “esu” relationships, was typical in Japan. That’s where Jill was coming from, she said, but not Cheri. Cheri’s world included others.

Mrs. Harrison began sobbing.

“Mr. Harrison, tell me about Jill?”

“Jill had become obsessive about Cheri. She monitored her every move. She tried to cut Cheri off from other people and even us. Her angry outbursts we wearing us thin. We encouraged her to get out and find new friends. She became depressed when Cheri went off to college. Jill has applied at several schools and hasn’t heard anything back.”

“Did you know that Jill asked Cheri to go with her to the Carnival of Souls.”

“I had no idea.”

I told the Harrisons that suspects were being interviewed. I would find out what happened to their daughter.

“Again, I’m sorry for your loss.”

~~~

When I return to the station, CSI Mike hands me the ME’s report on Cheri.

“Roy, the Medical Examiner’s report concluded that death was caused by ligature strangulation using the rope found at the scene. There was no sexual assault. Bruises and scratches on Cheri’s arms suggest that she struggled to get free from her attackers.

“Someone had to be tall enough to remove the rope from the gallows. And someone had to be strong enough to tackle Cheri, hold her down, and strangle her. The only one’s around were the characters of the horror house and the owner.”

“Right now, Mike, I have a dopey Executioner whose lead for the play he’s directing is dead and a stalker friend who was with Cheri last night but saw nothing.”

“And, you have this.”

 Mike handed me another page of the ME report. It explained what was found under Cheri’s fingernails: brown hair-like polyester strands, the kind used for costumes. The same strands were found on the hemp rope and the smell of weed.

I return to question Mr. Orme.

~~~

Mr. Orme, the THC swab detected the presence of THC in your system.”

“OK. OK. When I was done with my “side show” I went out for a smoke. Wolf Man was outside.”

“And?”

“Wolf Man was smoking some really potent weed. I took a couple of hits but it was too much. That stuff was making Wolf Man howling crazy. He kept bitching about some chick protesting against trans athletes playing in women’s sports. Wolf Man took a long hit, handed the blunt to me, and went back inside. I threw the blunt away. My head was spinning. I stayed outside for a cigarette.”

I look through the notes I made at the scene. I find the name of the Wolf Man – Frank Kaleb.

“Hang tight, Hang Em High. I’ll be back.”

I leave the interview room and tell Lachance to bring in Wolf Man Frank Kaleb.

“A probable cause warrant will be issued to search the house for everything to do with the Wolf Man costume and weed and anything else suspicious. And send CSI to Carnival of Souls to look for a blunt on the ground behind the building.”

I return to question Jill.

~~~

“Jill, when you found out about Cheri’s roommate Senta and about the theater group and the volleyball team how did that make you feel?

I waited. Jill said nothing for a minute and then, “What is it . . . when . . . you know you are not needed and not missed anymore?”

“A motive? Jill, did you become angry because Cheri was no longer close with you?”

“I felt angry and sad when Cheri told me about her roommate and about theater guy who wanted to date her.”

“You told me she went back in to Carnival of Souls to tell him she wasn’t going to date him. Did you let her go in by herself because you knew what would happen? Were you that angry?”

Jill looked down and said nothing.

~~~

While I waited for Wolf Woman to arrive, I asked the medical examiner for what he could tell me about the effects of potent cannabis.

“Roy, Cannabis-induced psychosis can produce instant psychopathy. It can trigger sudden paranoia, suspiciousness, and a sense of grandiosity. It can trigger a break from reality, hallucinations, a feeling of unreality, disorganized thoughts, inappropriate emotional responses, and unusual changes in behavior.

“Regular use increases the chances of experiencing psychosis. Individuals with pre-existing mental health issues are more susceptible. Cannabis-induced psychosis is usually acute and temporary.

“There was a case in 2018 of a young woman who smoked her boyfriend’s blunt containing a high dose of cannabis. She wasn’t accustomed to smoking pot. After taking a couple of hits, she went into his kitchen and brought out a handful of knives. She began stabbing her boyfriend over 100 times. He died from his wounds.

“Then, she began stabbing her service dog, who also died. Then she started to stab herself with a long-serrated knife. Cannabis takes more than it gives.”

Sarge came over. “Roy, Lachance is on the phone.”

“Roy, we picked up Frank Kaleb, aka Fran Kaleb, aka the Wolf Man.”

“What? Wolf Man is Wolf Woman?”

“Yeah. There’s more than meets the eye here. Too much more. I have the costume and we found a stash of cannabis. Her partner is going ballistic about everything.”

“Bring Wolf Woman in before there’s another full moon.”

~~~

I walk into Interview room #3.

“Hello Frank – Fran – Wolf Woman. Anyone or anything else I should know?

“Yeah, copper. Don’t misgender me or I’ll have your badge.”

“You misgendered yourself, Fran. And you classified yourself as a furry. I’ll take your badge.”

“Ha. Ha.”

“Last night. You were working as the Wolf Man. Correct?”

“Yeah.”

“You’re about six feet tall, correct?”

“Yeah.”

“Been working out?”

“Yeah. I can deadlift my weight.”

“Your weight?”

“170. Where is this going?”

“Go out for a smoke at closing time?

“What?”

“I have a witness who says you were outside smoking a really strong blunt. Then you passed it to him and went back inside.”

“Yeah, so what?”

“A dead woman, that’s what.”

“You people like to discriminate against people like me.”

“We like to sort out people who single out others for murder.”

“C’mon detective. I smoke weed for my back pain.”

“My witness says that you were bitching about a woman voicing her concerns about men playing in women’s sports.”

“Yeah, well, sure. Discrimination. It’s us against them!”

“Frank-Fran, you will be swabbed for THC. And, a warrant will used to draw your blood to check levels of THC.

“Strangling someone, cutting off their air supply, is rarely about wanting to kill. It’s about asserting total control. You wanted to control Cheri, the one speaking out about men in women’s sports. Strangling Cheri was your way of saying “shut up bitch.”

“I was just trying to scare her.”

“You scared the life right out of her. Right now, Fran, based on the autopsy report, the CSI report, the toxicology report, and the medical examiner’s report based on the costume fibers found on the victim and on the rope used to strangle Cheri, and a tossed blunt behind Carnival of Souls, and a motive to silence Cheri, I will be turning everything over to the DA.

“You will likely face charges of felony strangulation which may escalate to attempted murder charges. You will be spending your time in a different house of horrors and for many moons.”

~~~

Back at my desk after a long day of chasing down facts and findings, I sit down for some licorice snaps.

On my desk someone had placed a printed news page with the title New Mexico man accused of fatally shooting cousin after argument over enchiladas.

A New Mexico man had been accused of fatally shooting his cousin after an evening of drinking which escalated from an argument into a fistfight over enchiladas.

According to the affidavit, a cousin of both men and a witness to the shooting told authorities that the three men bought groceries, returned to the apartment and cooked green enchiladas while drinking alcohol.

Tension began when Gutierrez repeatedly claimed the chili on his enchiladas was hotter than the chili on Cavazos’ plate and challenged him to eat some. Cavazos responded that they had all eaten the same enchiladas, so the chili should be equally hot. The men continued arguing after the witness suggested they take the dog for a walk.

Eventually, the two fought, according to the witness’ account. Cavazos struck Gutierrez enough to leave him bleeding before the fight ended and Cavazos walked away.

The witness told investigators that Gutierrez then allegedly pulled out a handgun and confronted Cavazos, saying, “We’re family! We’re family! How could you do this to me?”

The witness said Cavazos was about 10 feet away and was not holding a weapon when Gutierrez fired three or four times, striking him in the back. Gutierrez then fled.

Lachance walked up biting her lips trying not to smile. “Quite a story, eh?

“It doesn’t take much to set people off, does it? A little jealousy, a little pride, a little matter of taste, a little “I want control of the whole enchilada” mixed with alcohol, pot, drugs, and a tormented soul torments someone else just to square things up. Maybe that’s it.”

“What?”

“Why Orme and Jill could handle Cheri’s death like it was nothing to them. In their own way they said “We’re family! We’re family! How could you do this to me?” The theater director was rejected by the female lead and the high school friend felt rejected when Cheri went off to college, joined the drama club, and volleyball. Maybe Cheri’s death vicariously squared things up for them. Her death ended the rejection. But there is always more than meets the eye. I’ll look into them tomorrow.”

“Laci!”

“Hi Marjorie.”

“Laci, Roy just closed a case. He’s talking about Mexican food.”

“Yeah. I want to know who’s chilis are hotter. Mine or yours.”

“C’mon Roy. You’ve been at this since three this morning. Put down the snaps. We’re going out to eat. You don’t want me to become jealous of your job, do you?

I follow my best girl out the door.

~~

©J.A. Johnson, Kingdom Venturers, 2026, All Rights Reserved

When Trust Goes Bust

Public trust. Is it engendered or eroded when elites, experts, and egos generate and double down on “dead right” narratives that distort and even deny reality leading to deception, disorder, dysfunction, and even destruction of life and do so for dubious and decidedly power-hungry and vainglorious ends?

You know the answer but here are few recent examples that answer this question:

Public trust in higher education eroded when Claudine Gay, the first black woman to become a (DEI-hire) president of Harvard, was forced out over plagiarism allegations after only seven months in the post.

And again, public trust in higher education eroded when elites at Cambridge University failed to do its due diligence and DEI-hired the youngest Black professor in the university’s history and described the plagiarist as a “respected scholar.”

Public trust in the Supreme Court eroded when the Joe Biden-nominated and DEI-hired Ketanji Brown “black girl magic” Jackson, a woman who would not define what a woman is and does not understand the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, was seated on the highest court in the land.

Public trust in the Supreme Court eroded when the Barack Obama-nominated Sonia “wise Latina” Sotomayor, a vocal political partisan and a woman who “gruesomely compared babies in the womb to being brain dead during oral arguments,” was seated on the highest court in the land.

Public trust in major institutions and professions, and especially the legal profession meant to support the rule of law, erodes as female participation increases and feminine patterns of behavior are applied: “prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition.”

Public trust in a brand eroded when a company’s female marketing executive ignored customers and partnered with a trans-activist to suit a woke agenda and almost single-handedly destroyed the brand.

Public trust in a brand eroded when a company’s female CEO ignored customers and redesigned the company’s logo to suit a woke agenda causing shares of the company’s stock to drop like a rock as customers vowed to never step foot in the store again.

Public trust in the church and church leadership eroded when Sarah Mullally, another preachy Progressive who is a self-declared feminist and supporter of LGBTQ+ rights and activism and who has strongly backed asylum and migration, was elected Archbishop of Canterbury on January 28, 2026.

Public trust in the church and church leadership and the transcendent eroded when The Church of England covered the interior of the oldest cathedral in England in graffiti in order to represent the world to the world.

Public trust in climate experts eroded with the climate alarmism claims of Al Gore and with the scientific consensus predictions of climate doomsdays that never happened.

Public trust in the media and journalism eroded with the fawning over the DEI picks Claudine Gay, Ketanji Brown Jackson, and fabulist Jason Arday, and with the whack-a-doodle nonsense of climate experts.

Public trust in the MSM erodes every day with its talking heads calling people “election deniers,” (nee “COVID science deniers” and “climate science deniers”) for questioning the integrity of the 2020 election – “the most secure election in history” – and for questioning anything that comes out of their mouth.

Public trust in scientific authority has gone bust with the exposure of a public health official with a God complex – the man, the myth, and the legend who calls himself “the science” . . . the vainglorious Anthony Fauci.

~~~

The misanthropic handling of COVID by public health “experts” caused public trust to go BUST . . .

When medical freedom was ignored. . .

When Americans weren’t fully informed about natural immunity. . .

When Americans weren’t allowed fully informed consent about the COVID vaccine. . .

When Americans weren’t fully informed about adverse events from COVID vaccinations from each of the three vaccines— Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson. . .

When siblings who had received the COVID jab to keep their jobs now have serious physical issues and the siblings who hadn’t received the jab have none. . .

When pregnant women weren’t fully informed about the possibility of a miscarriages following the COVID vaccination. . .

When Americans weren’t informed about the prophylactic benefits of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin so that an mRNA vaccine with a spike protein could be rolled out and tested on the public . . .

When the FDA and the media ridiculed the use of Ivermectin for treating COVID by saying “You are not a horse” . . .

When the unvaccinated were made social pariahs and scapegoats and their livelihoods threatened for not taking the mRNA vaccine for a flu-like virus that has over a 98% survival rate . . .

When service members in all branches of the military who refused the vaccine were discharged and lost pensions, military housing and medical benefits for their families. . .

When, during lockdowns, Black Lives Matter was OK’d to gather and march for a political social justice cause but churches could not gather. . .

When anyone – especially Jennifer Nuzzo, a Johns Hopkins epidemiologist – thought that a mass protest would bring an end to “systemic racism” . . .

When schools, businesses, and churches closed but not liquor stores and cannabis shops during the 14 days “to flatten the curve” . . .

When “two weeks to flatten the curve” extended into months during the spring of 2020, and schools remained closed for the following year and most students had to endure virtual learning as teachers’ unions demanded that schools remain closed . . . (See PDF below.)

When children, who have a 99%+ COVID survival rate, were made to take the untested vaccine . . .

When the “science was settled” and science shapeshifter “Fauci routinely replaced one narrative with another, contradicting what he had previously insisted was true” . . . (See PDF below.)

When the highfalutin Anthony Fauci “became the “’infallible leader’ whose words could never be questioned and whose lies were turned into a functioning reality” . . . (See PDF below.)

When a man so full of himself – a Mao of a man with a diary instead of a Little Red Book – was given totalitarian authority over science and public health . . .

When Mao’s mass murder legacy based on “political power grows out of the barrel of a gun” became Fauci’s gain-of-function mass murder legacy based on “personal power grows out of the needle of a syringe.”

“There is danger from all men. The only maxim of a free government ought to be to trust no man living with power to endanger the public liberty.” – John Adams

~~~

If I had one-trillionth the ego of Princess-Diaries Anthony Fauci and one-trillionth the gall of the talking heads of legacy media and of the politicians and celebrities who worshipped Fauci and themselves worshipping him, I would say “I told you so” about that pompous ass. But I’ll let the record speak for itself.

In a December 29, 2020 post My Unmasked Hero, I wrote

“Are you angry yet?

“Why is Anthony Fauci, a media hog, goal post mover, and dangerous buffoon, telling us how we should live our lives?

“Why are hydroxychloroquine and alternative COVID19 treatments blacklisted? Do you think Big Pharma and Big Tech oligarchs and their foundations have something to do with that?

“Did you know that “the country’s lockdowns were meant to emulate those carried out by the Chinese Communist Party  – modeled to strip civil liberties and exert authoritarian control over citizens?

“Why are all deaths reclassified as COVID-19 deaths?

“Why are healthy people being masked and locked down?

“No more studies are required. I am angry (and mask less)!”

My Unmasked Hero does not refer to Anthony Fauci.

My Unmasked Hero refers to a woman who stands her ground in a CVS store when being confronted by an employee and customer about being maskless. The woman adamantly declares that she is “done” with being a sheep and blindly following COVID-19 orders that restrict her freedom:

“I am a healthy person. I am not crazy.”

“I’m not saying COVID’s not real. I’m just saying, I’m not sick. I’m not sick and asymptomatic spread has been shown to be a myth, so why am I going to be treated like a sick person?

“Do you know that there have been fewer deaths in [2020] than in [2019]? All they’ve done is recategorize all the deaths. This is not what they’re telling us it is. It’s a lie. This is a lie, I’m telling you.

“It’s a lie and everyone’s buying it. And it will go on, and on, and on as long as they feed us this lie and we comply with it, and I am done. Tonight, I’ve reached a breaking point, I’m done. I know I’m not reaching any of you in here, I don’t care.”

~~~

Thousands of people from all over the world read my posts during COVID. With dozens of posts I warned readers about the fiendish Dr. Faustus Fauci and about his scientism sorcery.

I warned readers in dozens of posts and short stories about the authoritarian ways people were being dealt with under Fauci’s flip-flopping-keep-the public-on-the hook public health decrees.

I warned readers about the effects of lockdowns, mask mandates, social distancing, and about vaccination requirements that included vaccine passports and a possible roll out of a digital social credit system to control the public.

In my April 11, 2021 post Are We to Be Their Playthings? I noted the disdain for the unvaccinated in a NYT article (White Evangelical Resistance Is Obstacle in Vaccination Effort): “Distrust of scientists has become part of cultural identity, of what it means to be white and evangelical in America.”

And, I asked

“So, we are to trust Anthony Fauci, who with Francis Collins of the NIH, was behind the gain of function experiments gone awry in Wuhan China? Are we to trust scientism – scientific claims devoid of empirical evidence and debate and derived from ideology?”

I warned readers in an October 17, 2021 post about the adverse effects of the COVID vaccine. Here’s an updated summary: (UPDATED) Exclusive Summary: Covid-19 Vaccine Concerns | Sharyl Attkisson

In my September 26, 2020 post Tales from the Lockdown Crypt I warned about the increase of suicides and opioid overdoses due to COVID lockdown policies. And I posted The Great Barrington Declaration:

“As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.”

I warned readers about good people being canceled on social media and in MSM for speaking out.

I warned readers about the CDC-planned quarantine camps (for a flu-like virus!).

I warned readers about the NIH’s devious Dr. Francis Collins colluding with Fauci to create the gain-of-function virus and to hide its Wuhan lab origins.

I warned readers about the untested COVID vaccine and the suppression of any talk of natural immunity by public health officials under the back-room direction of the self-enamored Fauci. We now know that lockdowns were enforced and any talk about natural immunity was delayed so that the vaccine might be rolled out.

I wasn’t alone in my warnings about the dangerous effects of the untested vaccine:

Fauci Privately Said Covid Shot Could Be Associated With Miscarriage Before Publicly Claiming “No Red Flags” | Evie Magazine

Fauci Privately Flagged Miscarriage Risk Before Telling Pregnant Women There Were ‘No Red Flags’ | ZeroHedge

Fauci privately raised miscarriage risk from mRNA vaccine dose two | Fox News

‘Error in Judgment’: Former CDC Director Says it Was ‘Mistake’ to Recommend Covid Vaccine to Pregnant Women

On November 7, 2021 I provided a document which says . . .

We conclude that the claims made using these data on the safety of exposure of women in early pregnancy to mRNA-based vaccines to prevent COVID-19 are unwarranted and recommend that those policy decisions be revisited.

In my January 2, 2022 post Mysteries of the Known Knowns I asked

“Why are we being used as lab rats?

“How is it that government entities demand our accountability about all things COVID BUT the manufacturers of the vaccines are NOT held accountable for what they dispense? If the risks are not discussed, how can there be informed consent?”

And

“If it can’t be questioned, is it science?

Bureaucrat overlord Anthony Fauci has effectively declared “I am the Way, the Science and the Life. No one comes to COVID freedom except by me.””

And

“Is COVID Absolutism behind the Current Psychic Epidemic?

“How is it that countries with the majority of their populations vaccinated are in panic mode? Why are there calls for more panic, lockdowns, passports, and mandates? Is science, logic or even altruism behind this? OR, is the desire to create a new social order under totalitarian control behind creating a fear-based populism?

“Why are people going along with the manufactured panic? Why do “the masses whole-heartedly accept everything that Dr. Fauci or other national and global health officials proclaim”?

“Why the collective psychosis?”

~~~

On March 5, 2023 I posted this video:

In a May 19, 2024 post I wrote:

“As we saw during COVID, the collusion of science and state powers forms a dangerous mix. We were told and made to “trust the science” about masks, lockdowns, social distancing, and the COVID vaccine for a flu virus that was 99.9 % survivable for healthy adults who were not very elderly.

“The elites of public health central planning lied to us about immunity so that the vaccine could be pushed by the medical-industrial complex. They told us lies about hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin so that the vaccine could be pushed by the medical-industrial complex. They told us lies about the origins of COVID to protect the medical-industrial complex that created a gain-of function virus.”

~~~

I warned readers about scientism – the deadly admixture of science and politics to produce the transfer of power into the hands of a few elites. And now that Anthony Fauci’s diaries and emails and texts have been exposed, COVID scientism can be described as the deadly witches’ brew of science and egotism.

Anthony Fauci epitomizes what the elites and experts of the Ruling Class, of Progressivism, of socialism and communism are capable of: draconian measures to ensure compliance to massive egos

Long time readers will know that I have warned against the totalitarian impulse so prevalent in misanthropic group above. For, they deem the public as eggs for their glorious omelets.

As a reminder, the nature of totalitarian ideologies include

Simple, Irrefutable Beliefs (the “science is settled”)

Promise of Utopia (“two weeks to fatten the curve” & “vaccinations will stop COVID”)

Blame and Persecution (“the unvaccinated are the cause of increased cases and the need for continued lockdowns”)

Concentration of Power (Fauci: “I am the science.”)

The Means Displace the Ends (the Big Pharma-sponsored Pravda media censoring opposing voices and posting daily death counts to produce mass fear and compliance with COVID scientism)

The Illusion of Perfecting Humanity (“We’re all in this together.”)

The above is taken from Totalitarian Ideologies 101: We need to start teaching students to recognize totalitarianism so they can resist it. (See PDF below.)

With this post and the many I’ve written, I am pointing out that there is information that the Pravda media (MS NOW, CNN, NYT, etc.) never gave the public, information that would have engendered public trust and saved lives.

History and current events reveal that anything can be rationalized when politics is everything and power its ultimate goal. Public trust erodes when elites, experts, and egos generate and double down on “dead right” narratives that distort and even deny reality leading to deception, disorder, dysfunction, and even destruction of life and do so for dubious and decidedly power-hungry and vainglorious ends.

“All persons possessing any portion of power ought to be strongly and awfully impressed with an idea that they act in trust, and that they are to account for their conduct in that trust to the one great Master, Author, and Founder of society.” – Edmund Burke

~~~

Claremont Institute Senior Fellow Angelo Codevilla had this to say about America’s Ruling Class — And the Perils of Revolution:

“This dismissal of the American people’s intellectual, spiritual, and moral substance is the very heart of what our ruling class is about. Its principal article of faith, its claim to the right to decide for others, is precisely that it knows things and operates by standards beyond others’ comprehension . . .

“Because ordinary people will pervert reason with ideology, religion, or interest, science is “science” only in the “right” hands. Consensus among the right people is the only standard of truth. Facts and logic matter only insofar as proper authority acknowledges them . . .

“That is why the ruling class is united and adamant about nothing so much as its right to pronounce definitive, “scientific” judgment on whatever it chooses . . .

“The fact that the “hockey stick” conclusion stands discredited and Mann and associates are on record manipulating peer review, the fact that science-by-secret-data is an oxymoron, the very distinction between truth and error, all matter far less to the ruling class than the distinction between itself and those they rule.”

https://spectator.org/americas-ruling-class

~~~

“When the anointed say that there is a crisis this means that something must be done —and it must be done simply because the anointed want it done.”
― Thomas Sowell, The Vision Of The Annointed: Self-congratulation As A Basis For Social Policy

~~~

“Despotism has so often been established in the name of liberty that experience should warn us to judge parties by their practices rather than their preachings.”
—Raymond Aron, The Opium of the Intellectuals

(Replace “liberty” with the Left’s “crisis of Democracy!” and you will understand what they are after.)

~~~

/

Doc>>> Totalitarian Ideologies 101

~~~

I Read 1000 pages of Fauci Diaries. It’s Bad. | Dr. Vinay Prasad

In late July, Senator Rand Paul publicly released over 1,000 pages of notes that Fauci had kept—on a government server—during his time as Covid-19 czar, between 2019 and 2022. Shortly thereafter, Fauci was forced to testify before the Senate, on July 29. Then in early August, Paul and fellow Republican senator Ron Johnson released a set of texts, obtained from Fauci’s government-issued cell phone, between him and other health officials. In the following weeks, the “Fauci Diaries” sparked a new debate over Dr. Fauci’s legacy.

The pages, as well as Fauci’s testimony and subsequently released text messages, revealed an alarming gap between what Fauci told the public and what he told others privately and admitted to himself—about the virus’s possible origins, concerns over vaccine safety for pregnant women, the effectiveness of boosters, the efficacy of school closures, and more.

Dr. Vinay Prasad is a hematologist-oncologist who broke early with conventional wisdom on how to handle the pandemic and later became the FDA’s top vaccine regulator. He has also read the Fauci diaries in full, and he’s here to break down every revelation.

I Read 1000 pages of Fauci Diaries. It’s Bad. | Dr. Vinay Prasad – YouTube

COVID: The Cover-Up & Crimes Against Humanity with Sen. Ron Johnson

~~~

Nothing to hide . . . but the truth.

Damning clip of Fauci that makes Swiss cheese of his ‘Fifth Amendment’ scheme… – Revolver News

Chaos Agent: Anthony Fauci Represents A System That Needs To Be Cleansed | ZeroHedge

Tim Robbins tells Joe Rogan — ‘Ivermectin cured me during Covid.’

Anthony Fauci’s Fifth Amendment Strategy May Not End the Investigation | The American Spectator | USA News and Politics

The Princess Diaries of Anthony Fauci – The American Conservative

~~~

Jeffrey Tucker interviews Dr. Naomi Wolf, author and early public intellectual who first raised the alarm in May 2021 about COVID injections and severe menstrual disruptions in women. They discuss her rapid cancellation, the Missouri v. Biden discovery showing CDC and Biden administration officials circulating her tweet as an example to suppress, the FDA’s attempt to seal Pfizer documents for 75 years, and the crowdsourced work of 3,500+ doctors and scientists through Daily Clout that uncovered high miscarriage rates, ovarian and placental damage, and drops in sperm counts buried in those documents. (Emphasis mine.)

Sounding the Alarm on Women’s Health: Naomi Wolf on the COVID Shots & Cancellation

~~~

Republicans make their first move against Fauci… – Revolver News

~~~

Flattening the Fauci Ego Curve:

Legal Experts Explain How States Can Hold Fauci Accountable

Anthony Fauci and the Collapse of Scientific Authority

Fauci’s Personal Diary Just Got Released and It’s Brutal – Self-Absorbed, Fame-Seeking, Celeb Worshiping, Power Mad Liar

Anthony Fauci Celebrated ‘Flattering’ Press Stories in Diary

Check out some of these Fauci quotes, incredible.

Rand Paul has everything organized here, including Dr. Baric.

This entire diary thread is wild.

BOOM: Ugly truth about Jake Tapper just revealed, thanks to Fauci’s private diary entries… – Revolver News

Journalists Are Still Defending Fauci Because They Spent Years Dehumanizing Covid Dissidents Based On His Lies

Fauci’s Diary-Uh: ‘Science’s’ Biggest COVID-Era Lies Thus Far – PJ Media

Vinay Prasad: Anthony Fauci’s Vaccine Deceptions

Watters: Fauci knew he BLEW IT

BREAKING: Dr. Anthony Fauci pleads the Fifth Amendment in Senate hearing bombshell…

The Rise and Fall of Anthony Fauci › American Greatness

Watch: Fauci shakes uncontrollably while reading his opening statement…

Dr. Anthony Fauci testifies at Senate hearing on COVID-19 origins…

Rand warns Fauci he’s playing with fire…

The Ivermectin Question Heard ‘Round The World…

Fauci told on himself…

Never forget what this man did…

Revolvers 5-year-old investigation on Fauci still holds today…

The Ivermectin Question Heard ‘Round The World…

Never forget what this man did…

Mike Benz explains why Fauci pleaded the Fifth and how it can’t save him…

These Newly Released Texts Prove What a Monster Fauci Really Is – PJ Media

A Romp through the Fauci Diaries: Fame Turns to Shame

Top 27 Revelations in the Fauci Diaries | The Epoch Times

Fauci In Hiding As ABC Censorship Bombshell Explodes | ZeroHedge

Ex-ABC News Reporter: Fauci Whined and Killed Our COVID Story

An unanswered first-order question from the COVID-19 pandemic is this: Why was America’s pandemic doctrine in 2020 apparently so lacking after nearly forty years under Dr. Anthony Fauci’s leadership and after spending more than $60 billion preparing for the next inevitable outbreak? (Emphasis mine.)

Fauci And The Pandemic Playbook That Wasn’t – American Thinker

In May 2021, Janet Woodcock, the Acting Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), sent an email to Dr. Anthony Fauci, then director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Dr. Francis Collins, then director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director, expressing concern about the large number of adverse events she was hearing about following COVID vaccinations. . .

Woodcock said she had personally received reports from people, including many healthcare professionals, experiencing hard to classify adverse events that were not being captured by existing surveillance systems like VAERS.

She said all three of the vaccines— Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson—were resulting in these injuries. (Emphasis mine.)

In May 2021, Acting FDA Commissioner Emailed Fauci With Concerns About COVID Vaccine Injuries, Said ‘No One Takes Them Seriously’ › American Greatness

[David] Morens and his co-conspirators also used his Gmail account to share nonpublic information from the NIH about COVID-19 and “back-channel” information to an unidentified senior NIAID official, who appears to be Anthony Fauci, the institute’s former director, according to court filings.

David Morens, former NIAID adviser, pleads guilty in COVID-19 records scheme – CBS News

Fauci diaries, released by Sen. Rand Paul, touch on COVID origins and tense relationship with Trump – CBS News

~~~

“That’s the difference between governments and individuals. Governments don’t care, individuals do.”
-Mark Twain, A Tramp Abroad

“The mania for giving the Government power to meddle with the private affairs of cities or citizens is likely to cause endless trouble, through the rivalry of schools and creeds that are anxious to obtain official recognition, and there is great danger that our people will lose our independence of thought and action which is the cause of much of our greatness, and sink into the helplessness of the Frenchman or German who expects his government to feed him when hungry, clothe him when naked, to prescribe when his child may be born and when he may die, and, in fine, to regulate every act of humanity from the cradle to the tomb, including the manner in which he may seek future admission to paradise.”

-Mark Twain, Official Physic

Day of Reckoning

We do not need more intellectual power; we need more moral power. We do not need more knowledge; we need more character. We do not need more government; we need more culture. We do not need more law; we need more religion. We do not need more of the things that are seen, we need more of the things that are unseen. . .. If the foundation be firm, the superstructure will stand.

Calvin Coolidge, Vice presidential address at Wheaton College, Norton, Massachusetts, June 19, 1923

~~~

What the Lindsay Clancy mass psychosis tells us about where our society is today…is pretty dark.

Check Out Spencer Pratt’s Brutal Takedown of the Left’s Defense of Lindsay Clancy – PJ Media

Added 8-30-2026: Elites and Experts talking Climate Catastrophe

The Tomorrow No One Thought Of

“Roy, some ivory tower guy will say that the gun violence problem of big cities like Central City is due to the inequality between the rich and poor and to housing and education and guns and blah blah blah. But the Good Book says that evil intentions come from inside and those include stupidity. Any copper worth his salt will tell you that big city gun violence is due to someone without a lifeline playing fast and loose with forever by doing unbelievably stupid and vile things within seconds.”

After another day working the mean streets of Central City and a half hour of listening to Desk Sargent Grasso Il filosofo di strada, I was on my way to have a dinner of pork chops with my best girl. But then Sarge stops me in the parking lot. He wants me to check on a domestic disturbance in my neighborhood. Neighbors are calling the station.

I get to the Lopez place, walk up the steps, and find the door open. I poke my head inside. That was a mistake.

I come around half-conscious and curled up on the floor. Something like a sledge hammer wacked the back of my head. I look up and see a woman holding a cast iron frying pan

“Sorry, señor . . . Winder. I thought you are my soon-to-be ex.”

She had taken the ID out of my coat pocket. Does she have my service weapon? I check. It’s in the holster. I check the back of my head. There is a lump the size of an Easter egg. But no blood.

“I feel soon-to-be ex.”

Someone walks in the door and steps over me.

“Who’s this?”

“It’s policía.”

“You hit policía?”

“I thought Manny come back.”

The man helps me to my feet. I bring the swirling room up with me. He tells the woman to get some ice.

“Sorry, señor, it was mistake. No feelings hurt, OK?”

“You’ll get a raincheck on that, pal.” My knees crumble.

The guy walks me to the sofa and I lay down. He places a bag of ice behind my head.

“Why are you here, señor? The man asks this with ‘r’s rolling.

“The neighbors. The neighbors called saying there was a disturbance going on here.”

“I see. Manny was here. Matty and Manny they don’t get along.”

“Who are you?” I ask trying to remain conscious.

“Eduardo. Matty call me and say Manny outside. She throw him out last night. She no want him here.”

“I wish he’d been here a half hour ago.”

Eduardo laughed. “Yeah, me too señor.”

I open my eyes and see the frying pan woman standing at the foot of the sofa. She is holding a pocket mirror up to her face and putting on red lipstick. She looked like one of those femme fatales in the el cine negro movies my father-in-law likes to watch when he visits – a dangerous combination of beauty and vice. Her large dark eyes would bring men to their knees. Those two wrecking balls would make sure of it.

She turns away from the mirror. “Are . . . you . . . OK . . . señor . . . Winder?” Her deep voice purred out each word.

“I need to call my wife. She must be worried.”

She gives me a once over and says, “Lucky girl.”

I didn’t ask what she meant. Eduardo didn’t like what she meant. He narrowed his eyes and stared back at her.

Not with me I tell her.

A small boy peeks out from behind her wide hips and then hides again.

“Te veo hombrecito. Hi. Holá.”

The boy peeks out again. This time with a toothless smile.

¿Cómo te llamas?

He comes out from behind the woman with a hold on her silky dress.

“Miguel.”

“Mucho gusto Miguel. ¿Cuántos años tienes?

The boy holds up four fingers.

“Ah, no tan poco.” The boy let go of the dress ready to grab it again.

Eduardo helps me to my feet. My head is throbbing like a vodka toast hangover after a Polish wedding. I ask for my ID back and tell Matty to get a protection order if she feels threatened by Manny. “You don’t want to go from the frying pan into the cooler.”

What I said doesn’t make any sense to me or to them. So I say “I don’t want to come back here unless I am forced to. ¿Entiendes? Adios Miguel.”

The boy bites his lower lip and tugs on the dress as he watches me go out the door. I step out into the oppressive August heat and feel my heartbeat in my head. I call Laci and tell her I’m on my way.

~~~

Three AM Saturday morning the phone rings. It’s Sarge.

“How did things pan out for you at the Lopez place?”

“Who told you?”

“Laci. She knew you wouldn’t say anything.”

“Yeah. She’s right. I’m not down for the count if that’s what you’re wondering. And I’m guessing this isn’t a welfare check at three in the morning.”

“I need you to go over to Baila Escena over on fifth street. There’s been a shooting. One dead. CSI are headed over there now. Get going. And watch where you stick your head, Roy. Never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”

I hung up wondering what spirit Il filosofo di strada was imbibing at 3 AM. Was it the spirit of Hemmingway or Donne or of port wine?

Before I head over to the Zona Roja part of the city, I stop at Nighthawk Diner for a black coffee to go. Max, the owner, hands me the coffee and tells me that there is a full moon tonight. Of course there is, I say.

Baila Escena is on a rundown backstreet along with a pawn shop, a loan shop, a tattoo parlor, a package liquor store, and a smoke shop – each with bars on the windows.

There are two neon signs on the front of Baila Escena. One says it’s a dance studio during the week and the other says it’s a nightclub at night.

I go inside. The place has the wet cardboard smell of stale beer. And it is dark even with the house lights on. The walls, the small tables, the chairs, the dee jay booth, and the bar – everything is black. The windows are painted black. The only relief from the colorless setting are the liqueur bottles behind the bar and a few posters.

Behind the bar there is a dia del los muertos poster. Male and female skeletons are dancing in colorful outfits. A poster by the tables has a lively couple doing what is called “rumba caliente.”

I walk up to the bar. On the floor are three yellow evidence markers next to 9mm casings. The dead guy is seated on a bar chair and slumped against the bar. He’d been shot three times in the back. On the bar in front of him is an almost empty bottle of Salvadores Anejo and a shot glass. Shots in back. Shots in front.

The CSI guy is taking photos. I ask him who the dead guy is.

“Manny Lopez. He and his wife Matilda own the joint.”

The names had an all too familiar and painful ring. I guess no man is an island.

A short mustachioed man with a Guayabera Shirt pops up from behind the bar.

“We call her Matty.”

The CSI guy points while taking pictures. “That’s the guy who called 9-1-1.”

The little man hadn’t popped up. Was four foot six was all he had to offer?

“Who are you?”

“Emilio Estrada Ramírez. I am barback.” The little man began wiping the counter and I tell him to stop.

“What did you see?”

“Nothing, señor.  I was in back when I hear shots. I stay there and call 9-1-1.”

“Who else was working last night?”

“Milana. She is bartender.”

“What’s her last name?”

“Kharinova. She is Russian.”

“Anyone else?”

“The bouncer.”

“What’s his name?”

“Ron. I don’t know his other name.”

“Milana and Ron – were they around when this happened?”

“Everybody go home. They go home. We close at two.”

“So, Emilio, was it just you and Mr. Lopez?”

“Yes. Me and him. Manny alway have drink when close. I stay with him to he close.”

“Was Matty here?”

“Oh no. She leave with Eduardo . . .  I say about five when dance class is close.”

“Was anything taken? Anything from the cash drawer?”

“No sir.”

There are no CCTV cameras inside or outside. I have nothing and no one showing me who entered and shot Manny. I need to question Milana Kharinova and Ron the bouncer. I bring Emilio to the station for his statement.

I found out from Emilio that Milana goes to MMAclass on Saturdays. “She wants to be UFC fighter.”

~~~

I track down Central City MMA Academy in an industrial park outside city limits.

The Academy is in an industrial use space with high ceilings and a loading dock. There are mats on the floor and on the walls. Kids, teens, and adults are going at each other, some wrestling, some Muay Thai Kickboxing, and some with Jiu Jitsu. I ask an instructor if Milana Kharinova is training today. He calls her over.

Milana looks to be about five eight and a flyweight. Her short chestnut brown hair, gray eyes, and sharp jaw line give her a sophisticated and confident look. That she is training in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu told me that under her disarming beauty was a dynamo looking to take on all comers.

I take Milana outside and show her my ID. The first thing she says: “Is Miguel OK?”

“Miguel? Is he four years old?”

“Yes. Miguel is four. Have you seen him?”

“I saw Miguel over at the Lopez house. He’s OK. Was he supposed to be there?”

“Yes. Matty watch him so I can train.”

“Milana, I am here to ask about the shooting last night at Baila Escena. You’re the bartender, right?”

“Yes. Wait. There was a shooting? Last night?”

“Yes. Manny Lopez was murdered.”

“Oh my God! I say goodnight to Manny and go to Matty to pick up Miguel.”

“What time was that?”

“Last call at one-thirty. I leave at two.”

“Did you see anyone go in around closing time?”

“No. Everyone go out.”

“Were there any cars parked out front.”

“No. No cars. Just homeless people. I take taxi to Matty.”

I tell her that I am going to see Matty and check on Miguel. I tell her that I need her to come to the station to make a statement after her class.

~~~

I drive over to the Lopez place. I want to have a talk with the woman who didn’t want Manny around.

This time I ring the doorbell, stand back about four feet, and wait for her to answer.

“Well helloooo detective. May I help you?”

“I’m sure you could, but I’m married. Ms. Lopez, I need to ask you a few questions.”

“Come in.”

I walk in and notice Miguel watching cartoons.  He turns to look at me and turns back to the TV. I walk over to him and pull something out of my coat pocket. It’s a box of licorice pastilles. I offer one to Miguel. He takes one, puts it in his mouth, begins to screw up his face, and then asks for another.

“What did you give him, detective?”

“Licorice.”

“Are you trying to take him from me?”

“I was just talking to his mother over at MMA class. Now, I want to talk to you about last night. Privately.”

We walk into the kitchen. I keep an eye on the frying pan.

“You talk to her about what? What about last night?” She had dropped the smooth sultry voice and began using sharp tones.

 “Where were you last night Ms. Lopez?”

“I was here. With Miguel and Eduardo.”

“All evening?”

“Yes.”

“Manny was murdered about ten hours ago.”

“Oh. I see. Who knows what he’s been up to. What’s that got to do with me?”

“That’s what I’m here to find out. With your husband and business partner out of the picture, you get Baila Escena all to yourself. And the other day when you conked me on the head, you thought it was Manny that you were smacking with that frying pan over there. You don’t want him around. You have motive. And you don’t seem at all bothered by his death.”

“I don’t want him around, detective, but no that way.”

Eduardo walked into the kitchen wearing only pajama bottoms.

“Oh señor. You are back. How is your head?”

“My cabeza is fine. But things are not fine at Baila Escena.”

“What do you mean?”

“Manny Lopez was murdered last night.”

“¡Dios mío.”

“Let’s talk privately.” I bring Eduardo to another room and out of earshot from Matty.

“Where were you last night, Eduardo?”

“I was here. With Matty and Miguel.”

“The whole night?”

“Yes. The dance studio close at five. I leave with Matty and Miguel.”

“When did Manny arrive?”

“Manny he come in at four to ready the club.”

“You leave with Miguel?”

“Yes. Miguel come to the club with Milana the bartender.”

“What time does she start?”

“Five. She brings Miguel to the club and we take him home with us. When Milana leave club at two she come pick him up.”

“This is Saturday. Miguel is here with you and Matty this morning.”

“Matty and I watch him in the dance studio when Milana goes to class on Tuesday and Saturday here.

“Is Milana in class right now?”

“Yes señor.”

“What is Matty’s relationship with Miguel?”

“She loves him very much. She wants to adopt him. She say she can’t have children.”

“I need you to come to the station right now and make a full statement. I’ll get Matty’s statement later today. I don’t want to leave Miguel alone.”

I didn’t want Matty and Eduardo alone together. I needed to find a hole big enough in someone’s story to crawl through and find the killer.

Before I go, I offer Miguel another pastille. He takes it and says thank you.

¿Estás bien, Miguel?

“Yes, sir.”

Miguel spoke with a raspy throat. His nose was running and his eyes were bloodshot. He’d been rubbing them.

“Cats bother you?” I point to the three cats that had the run of the place.

“Yes, sir. I like dogs better.”

“I like dogs, too. I’ll talk to your mother about the cats. I’ll check on you again, Miguel.”

Miguel smiled and rubbed his eyes.

~~~

At the station I walk in with Eduardo. Detective Smoltz is waiting in the hallway.

“Need any help with that hot tamale Matty, Roy?”

Eduardo lunges at Smoltz and unloads a punch to his jaw. Smoltz tries to return the blow, but I put myself in between him and Eduardo. The Sarge walks up. “You will not press charges, Smoltz. Go back to work.”

I interview Eduardo and he repeats the same things he tells me at the house. Then I ask “Eduardo, what is your relationship with Ms. Lopez?

“We teach dancing together.”

“And what else?”

“What else?”

“You were in pajama bottoms this morning. Is Matty divorcing Manny?”

“She want to but business is problem. She love dance studio but need club business to pay bills. They business together but no live together now.”

“Why does Matty want to divorce Manny?

“Matty say Manny cheat on her. But I do not think it was true.”

“Why?”

“Manny a good man. He help people. He help Milana. I tell Matty Manny good but it no matter.”

“So why are you taking a good man’s place?”

Eduardo didn’t answer.

“Did you kill Manny to have Matty and the business to yourself?”

“No señor.

“Would Ms. Lopez be crazy enough to have someone kill Manny?”

“No señor. She can be crazy in her blood but the boy make her less crazy.”

I finish the interview and have an officer take Eduardo home and bring Matty to the station.

If those two had anything to do with Manny’s death, they would alibi each other. I needed more to go on.

~~~

Milana arrives at the station. I bring her to Interview Room 1.

“Milana, I saw Miguel this morning. He is allergic to cats. He’s having a hard time breathing. Matty has three cats.”

“I find better place.”

“Milana, how many nights do you work at Baila Escena

“Six nights.”

“You said you left Baila Escena at two last night?

“Yes. At two. Everyone leave.”

“You saw no one come in?”

“No.”

“Did you ever see Manny cheat on Matty?”

“No. I never saw him cheat. He talk to women every night but I never see him do anything else.”

“Has he ever come on to you?”

“No. He knows what I can do to him if he did.”

“Do you know anyone who wanted to kill Manny?”

“No.”

“What do you know about Eduardo?”

“Eduardo is a friend. Maybe father.”

“Miguel’s father?”

“Maybe. Maybe father Jasper my MMA instructor. I see him when Eduardo stop with me. Eduardo is afraid of Ron.”

“Ron? Is he the bouncer at Baila Escena?

She nodded her head.

“What’s Ron’s last name?”

“Laverty.”

“What’s the story? Why is Eduardo afraid of Ron.”

“Ron watch me all the time. Ron is big man. That why Eduardo is afraid of him.”

“Why does Ron watch you?”

“I meet Ron online what they call mail-order service. In Russia I live with someone but he drink a lot and hurt me. I want to be MMA fighter. Take care of myself. But he says no.

“Ron pay for me to come to America. He want to marry me. I come to America with my friend Daria. I come stay with him. He talk to Manny get bar job for me. He keep eye on me. But I no want to marry him. He drink a lot and get mean. I stay maybe two week with him. No more. Manny help me get apartment.

“I meet Eduardo at club. He nice to me help me with rent but Ron scare him. I meet Jasper at MMA class. He nice to me. Give me free classes. Then I with child. Manny help me when baby come.

“Is Ron the father?”

“Ron think maybe is father but Ron say he had snip job. You know snip job?”

“Yes, I know.”

“Is the guy in Russia the father?”

“Maxim? I don’t know. He rape me and I leave.”

At this point, there are at least four paternal lines of inquiry into a dead man with no say in the matter, a mother and a boy who don’t know who the father is, and a tomorrow no one thought of.

“Does Matty know that you and Eduardo were together?”

“No. We careful.”

“Does Eduardo think Miguel is his son?”

“I think yes.”

“Does Matty know Miguel could be Eduardo’s son by you?

“I don’t know what Eduardo say to Matty.”

“Here’s what I heard you say, Milana: you come to America to get away from a drinking and abusive guy who raped you. You stay with Ron, who paid your way to America, maybe two weeks because he drinks and is mean to you. He got you a job at Baila Escena maybe to keep an eye on you.

“Your boss Manny gets you an apartment. You hook up with dance studio Eduardo who helps pay the rent. But Eduardo is afraid of Ron and leaves you. Then you hook up with Jasper who gives you free MMA classes. You find out that you are pregnant. All in less than a month. Is that right?”

“Yes.”

“And now, after four years, there are four men who think that Miguel may be their son: a Russian, one who shoots blanks, and two who help you in exchange for God knows what.

“Detective, men use me and I use them.”

“I am not here to judge you, Milana. I am working for the dead man. And the boy.”

There is a scuffle and shouting in the hallway. Orbits colliding? I get up to see.

~~~

Five officers are having trouble restraining two guys. One of the guys is huge. He had to be six foot five and two-hundred-fifty pounds. The other is a scrappy looking guy with dirty blond hair, mustache and goatee.

One of the officers says, “These two were going at it outside the Lopez house.”

“Who’s the big lug?”

“Ron Laverty.”

“The other guy?”

“Maxim Chernykh. He shot some guy named Eduardo.”

“Is Eduardo OK?”

“He took a bullet to the gut. He’s in ER right now.”

“Was a guy named Jasper there?”

Both handcuffed guys growled, “Who’s Jasper?”

“No. No Jasper, Roy.”

“Was the boy in any danger?”

“Not that we could see. He stayed behind his mother.”

“Put the big lug in holding and put the shooter into Interview Room 2. Is the gun 9mm?”

One of the officers said it was.

“Before you send the gun to ballistics have it fingerprinted and check the serial number.”

“One other thing, Roy.” Sarge walked up to show me the two Russian passports found on Chernykh. One was for Maxim Chernykh and the other for Mikhail Chernykh. The boy’s picture looked like a cut-and-paste job.

“Sarge, send this one to Immigration. It looks fake.”

I return to Interview Room 1. I tell Milana that a guy named Maxim Chernykh was picked up outside the Lopez place. I tell her that he was threatening Ron with a gun and shot Eduardo.

Milana jumped out of the chair ready to fight. She looked at the door and back at me.

“Miguel . . . is Miguel . . .?

“Miguel is safe. You’re safe here, Milana. Ron is in holding and Mr. Chernykh is waiting for me to interview him. Please sit down.”

~~~

Before I talk to the Russian, I go to holding to interview Ron.

“Ron, what were you doing at the Lopez place?

“I followed Milana this morning. I wanted to see where she goes with Miguel. If he is my son, I have a right to see him. I pay fifteen thousand dollars for Milana to come here. Fifteen thousand dollars! And she stays away from me. She keeps the boy from me. I try not to be difficult but difficult people try my patience.”

“What happened over there?”

“I’m in my car and see this guy go to the door. He looks like the homeless guy I blocked from the club last night. I wonder what he is doing here.

“He starts yelling “I vant ze boy come out now!” A man opens the door and tells him to go away but the nutcase pulls a gun out and starts waving it around. So, I get out of the car and start yelling for him to back off. The guy points the gun at me and I tell him I’ll break his neck. The guy is in a hurry to get the boy. He turns the gun back on the man at the door and shoots him. I rush the nutcase and take him down and hold him for the police.”

“Ron, the situation could have been a lot worse if you hadn’t been there. You protected Miguel and saved lives. Now it’s time for hard words and hard choices. You need to go your own way and leave Milana and the boy alone. From what Milana tells me, Miguel is not your son. And she left you because in the short time she’s known you, she thinks of you as no different than the same drinking mean guy she left in Russia who is the nutcase you took down today. But you showed me better than that today.”

“I know I’m a big galoot. I paid big money not to be lonely and I’m still lonely.”

“I’m no Dr. Phil, Ron, or a Sargent Grasso, but maybe find a focus outside yourself.”

~~~

I walk into Interview Room 2. Chernykh is pacing with clenched fists.

“Sit down Mr. Chernykh.”

He scraps the chair back, sits down, throws both arms on the table, leans in, and scowls at me with an open mouth and wolfish green eyes.

“Mr. Chernykh why were you are the Lopez house?”

“Mikhail.”

“Mikhail?”

“Milana call him Miguel to hide him from me. But I find out from Daria.”

“Milana’s friend?

“She is my friend, too. I send her money.”

“You came to America because you believe four-year-old Miguel is your son because four years ago you raped Milana and she left Russia with Daria?”

“Detektiv, you tupoy? You do not know how vomen are?”

“You’re not as smart as you think, yobik.”

“Oh, yes. I get Mikhail take him to home to Russia. Daria come, too.”

“You shot Eduardo. Why?”

“He tupoy problema.”

“The gun. How did you get it?”

“Daria has friends.”

“I hope Eduardo makes it. You better hope so too, Mr. Chernykh. There are several charges pending including assault with a gun, attempted kidnapping and passport fraud. No Russia for you, pal. No Daria. No Mikhail. Yesli ti dyéystvooyesh’ kak doorák, ti boodyesh’ traktovat’sya tak.”

~~~

I return to Milana with a bottle of water.

“I talked to Ron. He followed you to the Lopez house this morning. He saw Miguel go in there and he saw Chernykh trying to take the boy from Eduardo. Chernykh shot Eduardo and Ron took him down and held until police arrived. Ron saved Miguel from being kidnapped.

“He isn’t happy, Milana, that he paid for you to come to America and that you and the boy stay away from him. I told him that Miguel is not his son and to let you and Miguel be.

“I talked to Chernykh and found out that Daria is not your friend. She’s been helping Chernykh so he can take Mikhail back to Russia. She told Chernykh where to find Mikhail. Chernykh said Daria was going with him.”

Milana’s face turned fierce. “I tell her everything. I tell her I leave Ron. I tell her I have baby. I tell her that Manny help me get apartment and help me with baby. Maxim kill a good man because good man help me and Miguel.”

“Chernykh shot another good man because Eduardo wouldn’t let him get near Mikhail. Ballistics is looking at the gun Maxim used on Eduardo. If it matches the gun used on Manny, he will be charged with first degree murder. And, if Daria is involved in Mikhail’s attempted kidnapping, in supplying a gun for Manny’s murder, and in passport forgery I will bring her down.

“There are several charges pending against Chernykh including assault with a gun, attempted kidnapping and passport fraud. I told him that if he was going to be an idiot he would be treated like an idiot. He will be locked up for a long time.”

Before I send Milana on her way, I tell her to find a place for Miguel that has no cats. I give her my card and tell her to call me when she finds it. I’ll come and check on Miguel. Milana’s been to the mat several times and not for Jiu Jitsu. I hope the boy comes out on top.

It’s been a long day. I head toward the parking lot hoping Sarge doesn’t see me. But he does.

“Roy, I’ve been aware for many decades that most murderers are morons. Aristotle said that actions are consistent with character.”

I tell him that Mrs. Sarge called. I tell him she has some pasta e fagioli and a bottle of chianti waiting for a character like him at home. I tell him I’m going home to Laci, and to some Pozole that my father-in-law made, and to watch Ninón Sevilla in Víctimas del Pecado with him. I pop a licorice pastille in my mouth and walk out the door.

~~

©J.A. Johnson, Kingdom Venturers, 2026, All Rights Reserved

Discernment Knows Better

History and current events reveal that anything can be rationalized when politics is everything and power its ultimate goal. The same holds true when empathy is everything and the pursuit of inclusion its ultimate goal – anything can be rationalized.

Wayward Christian empathy covers the interior of the oldest cathedral in England in graffiti, making it look like an underground car park, in order to represent the voices of “marginalized communities.”

Cosplay Christian empathy speaks with Christian platitudes and acts out the story it tells itself listening to the MSM narrative about immigration. Its theatrics would have us place a high value on a foreign invader’s human dignity to discourage deportation and place a negative value on immigration law, law enforcement, the country, and thereby, the human dignity of those living here.

The destructive effects of open borders – the flooding of communities and neighborhoods with unvetted foreigners, many with diseased bodies and diseased mindsets – are ignored in MSM narratives and the echoed Coplay Christian stories. Coplay Christians want to be the heroes of their own narratives, as I wrote in my post Self-Central Casting.

Tell me. Have you seen reports on MS NOW or CNN about those invaders who kill, maim, rape, drug to death our neighbors, and do horrible things to our children (See Arrested: Worst of the Worst)?

Tell me. Have you seen those outlets report on those who take jobs and housing and resources from those living here? Have you seen those outlets report on those who want to overthrow the country? Have you seen those outlets report on those who want to turn (colonize) areas of our country into Islamic no-go zones and force Sharia law on the everyone in the area?

See what you see and not what MS NOW or CNN or the NYT wants you to see.

Careless regard toward our neighbors by forcing foreigners upon them via an idealism of “welcoming the stranger” inclusion is not Christianity. Rather, it is coercive Marxist-like redistribution of resources and it is authoritarian, just like what is projected onto Christian nationalists.

The plea for acceptance of the idealist boot on the neck of our neighbor and for Progressivism’s ‘anything goes’ terms of Christianity comes from Christian leaders without discernment and with a desire to be relevant.

From the May 31, 2026 post No Country for Old Men Without Borders:

In the past six months I’ve come across two pastoral letters imploring Christians to think kindly toward the millions of foreign invaders who have illegally crossed our borders to appropriate our country’s resources and thereby impacting the future of our neighbors and the country.

Like with the end game of politics, when empathy is everything and the pursuit of inclusion its ultimate goal, anything can be rationalized.

And that’s how the Rev. Kate Penney Howard finds a way to equate Christian nationalism with the KKK.

The following Facebook post was forwarded to me for comment. I am not on social media and thankfully so. https://www.facebook.com/rev.kate.penney/posts/10243888131684638/

My response is below the post.

Response:

One can expect generalizations and projection in opinion pieces, and that is what you get in this snappy op-ed.

Pastor Howard begins with the generalization “we” referring to Hoosiers and goes on to relate a story about the Indiana KKK that the “we” are retelling themselves.

Her history redux, a 1920s story of “churchgoing” people seeing the KKK as a Christian movement and moral crusade, is projected onto current Indiana citizens that she believes are promoting Christian nationalism involving political will. She warns “we are telling ourselves a story we have told before. It did not end well.”

What are the “we” to do with this op-ed sermonette claiming that Christian nationalism is KKK-like by deciding “who belongs and who does not?” What’s the implication? What’s the sermon’s application? The reader is left to speculate as to the “who” she is referring to and about what “belongs” means to her. Maybe her Facebook followers take in the same media as she does and know what she is inferring.

When empathy is everything and the pursuit of inclusion its ultimate goal, anything can be rationalized. And others can be slandered.

Equating Chrisitan nationalism with the hate-group KKK . . . is she, while decrying Christian nationalism, advocating in a backhanded way for a national policy of inclusion – open borders illegal immigration?

Is she against the Spirit-filled wanting to exercise their right as an Indiana and U.S. citizen to vote for the candidates and polices that decide who’s in and who’s out of the country for the safety and flourishing, not to mention the human dignity, of their family, their neighbors, their communities, and for the common good of all citizens? Would she consider them to be Christian nationalists and therefore KKK-like?

I wonder. Is she inclusive about everything? For example, is she OK with men in women’s sports and women’s locker rooms? Does she ever draw the line? Set boundaries? Exclude?

What does national exclusion and setting boundaries look like in scripture?  Let’s ask Nehemiah.

Why did you rebuild the wall of Jerusalem, Nehemiah?

“It was done to restore the city’s protection and honor. The walls had been broken down, leaving the city vulnerable and causing shame among its people. Without fortified walls around the city, the people were left defenseless against enemies. Opponents could easily enter and cause “great trouble” to the people. Rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem was a sign to the enemies of Israel.” (Read more here.)

What did you tell Israel’s enemies, Nehemiah?

“The God of heaven will give us success. We his servants will start rebuilding, but as for you, you have no share in Jerusalem or any claim or historic right to it” (Nehemiah 2:20).

I know that Nehemiah is OT and not ‘enlightened’ or WOKE as progressive Christians are today, BUT, it sure looks like Nehemiah was a Jewish nationalist and that he rebuilt the walls to keep out bad elements. Apparently, not all the strangers encountered in the Bible are the “strangers” that open borders sermonizers want us to welcome with open arms.

Nehemiah didn’t do the Deuteronomy 10:19 “stranger” thing. He didn’t do the Leviticus 19:34 “stranger” thing. And, fast forward, he didn’t do the Matthew 25:38 “stranger” thing.

Remind me. Did Jesus cast out Jewish nationalists or did he cast out unclean spirits – the demonic forces of the strong man in human vessels that were making havoc in the territory around Galilee?

Let’s review the tactics of the forces of the strong man. Those are to smear, slander, poison, accuse, lie, destroy, negate, censor, produce fear to bring about submission, and grab power and more power and more power.

Didn’t Jesus cast out what was trying to corrupt and usurp his kingdom on earth? (Read Mark 5.)

Pastor Howard states “We are hearing pastors and politicians say God has chosen a side.”?  I’ve never heard a pastor or politician say this, but Nehemiah and others in the OT have.

Nehemiah certainly says that God had chosen a side. And, he is not alone in his declaration of confidence in God being on his side, a side he understands as aligning with God’s purposes for the defense and good of Israel.

The shepherd-king David, when going to fight Goliath, said “The Lord who rescued me from the paw of the lion and the paw of the bear will rescue me from the hand of this Philistine.” He also said “The Lord is my shepherd” and “The LORD is my rock, my fortress, and my deliverer.” That’s imperious of him, in pastor Howard’s way of thinking.

And when he became king, David’s accountability didn’t disappear because God didn’t abandon him. We learn that David couldn’t justify his adultery and murder before the prophet Nathan. He received the consequences of his actions.

Would you choose a president who acknowledged God and invoked his favor or someone like Obama who considered himself and invoked his ideology?

Contrary to the reverend’s misleading projection onto our nation’s founders about what they understood about claiming divine authority, they (and Abe Lincoln) did align themselves with divine authority and assigned that authority to safeguard their efforts.

The Founders concluded the Declaration of Independence by stating, “For the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.”

The Founders, building a republic and not a theocracy or a utopia, did decide who or what belongs and who or what does not.

Clauses like the Naturalization Clause and the Commerce Clause in the U.S. Constitution’s framework establish a strong federal role in immigration, to regulate immigration and naturalization.

Congress has almost complete authority to decide who may enter or remain in the United States. Congress can create rules for the admission of aliens.

(The recent reckless Supreme Court ruling, Trump v. Barbara, regarding birthright citizenship was decided by four women and John Roberts. The dissenting opinions rightfully claimed that the majority decision was a misread of both the Constitution (the intent of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866) and American history.  John Roberts decided that English common law was the basis for US. Citizenship. The Constitution says otherwise. Roberts apparently didn’t want to be subject to the jurisdiction thereof. More below.)

With the following, the reverend projects onto Christian nationalism her understanding of what the founders rejected:

 “Our nation’s founders [understood] what happened when governments claimed divine authority, how quickly God became a justification for control, exclusion and violence, and they made a choice.”

The founders did reject a state religion such as the Church of England that held significant influence over religious and political life. So, “The Constitution does not mention Jesus.”

But the founders did use religion as justification for “control, exclusion and violence.”

As The Library of Congress records, “Religion played a major role in the American Revolution by offering a moral sanction for opposition to the British–an assurance to the average American that revolution was justified in the sight of God.”

Many Revolutionary War clergy argued that the war against Britain was approved by God. In this sermon Abraham Keteltas celebrated the American effort as “the cause of truth, against error and falsehood . . .the cause of pure and undefiled religion, against bigotry, superstition, and human invention . . .in short, it is the cause of heaven against hell–of the kind Parent of the Universe against the prince of darkness, and the destroyer of the human race.”

The Founders, when establishing the federal government and a framework for conceiving of government and justice, did claim divine authority in the form of God’s providence as revealed in the Judeo-Christian scriptures and nature.

The Founders believed that humans are created in the image of God. They believed that human beings are inherently sinful and there would be no utopia on earth. They believed that God is the source of moral standards and that legislation should be in agreement with moral law. And, they believed that religious liberty is a God-given right and must be protected. The Left in America does not accept any of grounds for government and that is why Christian nationalism is seen as a threat.

The founders were the original Christian Nationalists. America’s earliest statesmen put national interest first.

Perhaps the reverend and her Facebook followers should read the following to gain insight into the founders:

and

Revolution: The Birth of the Greatest Nation in the History of the World

What about a version of Christianity that rejects what the founders established? What about disregarding immigration laws? What about disregarding your neighbors for the sake of better-than-thou religious beliefs? What about promoting open borders globalism? What about the deceitful religions of Progressivism and socialism that undermine reality and the Constitution?

Pastor Howard’s oblique use of “side” is the crux of the op-ed. What “side” is she on? The right way of thinking side as opposed to the “we” side that “feels faithful while it is happening?”

If people want to restore the nation to its Judeo-Christian bearings, is that Christian nationalism? Our heritage is worth preserving. The heritage of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the right to bear arms is worth preserving. Even now, Democrats are working to do away with all that in order to produce a secular totalitarian communist state that they believe will heal all wounds. Discernment knows better.

Anything can be rationalized when politics is everything and power its ultimate goal. The same holds true in Christian circles when empathy is everything and the pursuit of inclusion its ultimate goal – anything can be rationalized.

If people want to restore law and order and justice in the courts, is that picking sides or sound judgement? If people want to remove foreign invaders that came to plunder the homeland, is that KKK-like or removing that which is trying to corrupt and usurp what the founders established?

History, which has “a way of exposing what we would rather keep comfortable” has it that there was a coercive demand for the right way of thinking in the Soviet Union. Perhaps the reverend is more comfortable with the ideological orthodoxy of a closed society than the cultural pluralism of an open society she pretends to offer. (Listen to the podcast on the sidebar.)

The reverend reveals her side, her right way of thinking, when she condemns her opponents: “Certain policies were once political preferences but are now divine mandates. Opposing them is seen as rebellion against God.” What are the policies and divine mandates she is referencing? We are left to speculate. Is this about closing the border and deporting illegal migrants?

She says Jesus didn’t want or need political power. OK. But then she says “God does not need a government to do God’s work.” Is she thinking Jesus did away with nations and borders and now everything is open to inclusion and needs her Christian touch?

Yet, God did use government to do His work.

When Jesus was born, Rome had unified much of the world under its government. Under Pax Romana, the empire was relatively peaceful, travel was possible. This allowed Christians to spread the gospel. The Septuagint, the gospels and epistles and other texts handed down to us were not censored.

Romans 13 teaches that all governing authorities are established by God. The role of government is to maintain justice, restrain evil, and serve the common good. Governments provide security and order. Open borders and the Illegal immigration of millions is chaos and anarchy.

While Jesus did say “My kingdom is not of this world” he also taught his disciples to pray, “Your kingdom come. Your will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.” Government, in part, enables the latter. A government founded on Christian principles empowers the latter even more so.

The most dangerous thing about smearing Christian nationalism is that it feels faithful while it is happening. It wraps itself in inclusion theology but speaks the language of SPLC. It makes opposition into the KKK. Discernment knows better.

~~~

I cannot impute a motive onto Rev. Howard for her op-ed in the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette other than concern about Christian Nationalism. But I can ask if she is concerned with other exclusionary isms.

Is she concerned about the Democratic Socialists of America and their plan to destroy America and bring in communism? Communism will exclude those who don’t align with it. See history.

Is she concerned about the political rise of red-green alliance, a fusion of progressive socialism and Islamism? This alliance will exclude those who don’t align with them. See Mamdani’s NYC.

I can impute a motive onto the hate-funding Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Demonizing others is what the nasty Southern Poverty Law center (SPLC) does with hate maps and reports. “Democracy is threatened by anti-democracy extremist white Christian nationalism” is a SPLC narrative and an outright lie to produce fear.

For, Progressivism/globalism/socialism/communism – tyranny itself – cannot take over along as there Christians who are not controlled opposition. Projecting authoritarianism and tyranny onto Christian nationalism is a means to frighten people into submission to their lies. (Fear has also been used to produce submission to the COVID and climate crisis narratives.)

Because the narratives from the nasty Southern Poverty Law center (SPLC) are so pervasive as they filter through various media, it would not surprise me that there are Christian leaders who take them in and then feed these same narratives to their flock (and to social media) using one-part “Christianese” and one part media narrative while thinking they are being apolitical.

Learn about the SPLC. Learn how people are being manipulated:

Mike McDaniel writes Just when you thought SPLC revelations couldn’t get worse… – American Thinker:

A large part of what the SPLC did was to brand innocuous organizations like Turning Point USA or the Family Research Council as “hate” groups. The evidence of that “hate” was that they opposed Democrats and organizations like BLM and Antifa, which somehow were never so SPLC-branded. . .

It’s hard to imagine an organization and people more depraved. Should the allegations be proved, and it seems likely they will be, the SPLC defamed innocent, decent Americans, enriched and helped small groups of evil but largely ineffective people, and badly damaged America by stirring up racial hatred that wouldn’t have existed without their behind-the-scenes manipulations. They knew what buttons to push among black Americans and played on white guilt like harps from Hell, and we’re all the worse for it. (Emphasis mine.)

Even Red States Quietly Use Content from the SPLC | Headline USA:

Parental rights organization Defending Ed published an investigation revealing that nearly 200 school districts and 30 state government entities spread across 42 states and Washington D.C. publicly promote curriculum materials from the Southern Poverty Law Center.

The SPLC currently faces a federal wire fraud indictment. Prior to these charges, the organization became infamous for including mainstream conservative groups on its “hate map.” The Justice Department also opened a criminal investigation into claims the group directed funds to individuals tied to white supremacist movements and allegedly poured millions into efforts to influence Southern elections. . . .

Just the News documented how certain school districts employ aggressive tactics to conceal curricula, psychological programs, and information about which adults interact with students. These same districts, however, openly advertise their partnerships with the SPLC.

The SPLC’s “hate map” designated groups including the late Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA, Defending Ed, multiple Moms for Liberty chapters, Alliance Defending Freedom, Gays Against Groomers, and the Family Research Council. The FRC’s placement on that map motivated a terrorist attack against its Washington headquarters in 2013.

The content often pushes or reinforces far-left cultural and political ideologies such as left-wing activism, anti-racism, Black Lives Matter, gender ideology and queer theory, white privilege, white supremacy, whiteness, and transgenderism,” according to Defending Ed. (Emphasis mine.)

More about the SPLC:

We discovered 15 years ago SPLC was “creating fictitious hate so that they could then fundraise off of it”

Superseding Indictment Alleges SPLC Funded “Ku Klux Klan garments” and “Cross-Burning Events”

SPLC – Creating Hate To Fundraise To Fight Hate

SPLC charged with offering would-be KKK, Neo-Nazi defectors salaries to stay in, spy on hate groups…

SPLC boss funneled $1.2 million to lover in neo-Nazi group — pair even had joint bank account – AOL

CEO of the SPLC confirms it stands by its May 2025 decision to add TPUSA to its ‘hate map’…

SPLC’s Hate Inflation Strategy…

Hate studies experts won’t comment on allegations Southern Poverty Law Center funded KKK | The College Fix

~~~

History has a way of exposing what Democrats would rather keep comfortable.

The Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was closely associated with the Democrat Party, especially in the South, where most Klansmen were Democrats during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The Klan supported Democrat efforts to establish one-party rule and suppress black political power through violence and intimidation.

The Democrat Party is not against using KKK tactics while denouncing the KKK. They are not against spewing negativity and hate 24/7/365 online and in the media. Read the NYT op-eds. Watch MS-NOW. Watch the View and late night TV Democrats want the strong man’s power to take control.

History and current events reveal that anything can be rationalized when politics is everything and power its ultimate goal.

~~~

Todd Bensman refutes the left’s narrative in Is Trump Trying to Deport Venezuelans to Earthquake ‘Hell’?:

In June 2025, the Supreme Court cleared the administration to send illegal aliens to agreeable safe third countries other than their own. Since then, the administration has collected formal agreements with 15 countries across Latin America and the Caribbean with more coming.

The administration and all those who support its deportation goals have facts in pocket to smoke the patently false binary choice being peddled that it can either heartlessly send Venezuelans straight to “hell” or let them remain illegally in the U.S.

Beyond its opportunity to beat down a fake narrative, the administration possesses the moral and legal authority—and a rich buffet of options it probably didn’t realize it had—to actually speed up this large new deportation project.

~~~

The four women on the Supreme court ruled in favor of birthright citizenship . . .

Helen Andrews wrote in The Great Feminization | Compact

“Wokeness is not a new ideology, an outgrowth of Marxism, or a result of post-Obama disillusionment. It is simply feminine patterns of behavior applied to institutions where women were few in number until recently . . .

Everything you think of as wokeness involves prioritizing the feminine over the masculine: empathy over rationality, safety over risk, cohesion over competition . . .

“The threat posed by wokeness can be large or small depending on the industry . . . The field that frightens me most is the law. All of us depend on a functioning legal system, and, to be blunt, the rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female. The rule of law is not just about writing rules down. It means following them even when they yield an outcome that tugs at your heartstrings or runs contrary to your gut sense of which party is more sympathetic. 

“The problem is not that women are less talented than men or even that female modes of interaction are inferior in any objective sense. The problem is that female modes of interaction are not well suited to accomplishing the goals of many major institutions.” (Emphasis mine.)

Here’s a woman with discernment:

American Thinker Takeaways, July 6, 2026

~~~

Guiding the left is the fear that if permitted to go unchecked, the fact that America is indeed a Christian nation as designed would not be questioned. And so the left continues its enduring war on faith by trying to make it so that you’re an outcast simply for trying to insert the Judeo-Christian God into the conversation. Divide and conquer.

And so we have a battle today where a minority would have you believe that America is not a Christian nation, that if it can’t defeat Christianity through persuasion, it will do so by generating sheer numbers of imported people from other countries who practice other religions; by destroying anyone who would dare to mention their Christian faith in public life; and by shunning anyone who would openly and unapologetically profess his or her faith in Hollywood, the entertainment industry, or in the news media; and by marginalizing Christian faith in academia and in the schools. (Emphasis mine.)

On America 250: A Prayer for Our Country – PJ Media

~~~

The most damaging decision of the term, however, was Trump v. Barbara. In a ruling that will stand as a stain on the Court’s legacy, Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett joined the liberal justices to effectively preserve near-blanket birthright citizenship. This was a profound misreading of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. The authors of that Amendment, including Senator Lyman Trumbull of Illinois — a close friend and ally of Abraham Lincoln — made clear on the floor of the Senate that the clause was intended to secure citizenship for the children of emancipated slaves, not to create a magnet for illegal immigration or confer citizenship on the children of foreign nationals who owe no allegiance to the United States.

Not only the 14th Amendment, but the Civil Rights Act of 1866, passed by the same Congress, expressly limited citizenship to those “not subject to any foreign power.” That phrase, alone, signaled congressional intent to end blanket birthright citizenship. (Emphasis mine.)

The 2026 Supreme Court — a ‘C Minus’ at Best – American Thinker

Trump v. Barbara: Suicide by Cop-Out – American Thinker

~~~

Added 7-28-2026:

~~~

~~~

~~~

The Last Wound

Nighthawk Diner was almost empty by the time I walked in. My thoughts were rambling and looking for a place to land.

“Coffee, Roy?”

“Yeah, fill ‘er up. And a slice of your apple pie.” I shoved an empty cup across the counter toward Max.

The sound of gun shots came from the alley behind the diner. Then several more. I got up from the counter.

Max poured the coffee. “Roy, it’s almost The Fourth of July.” I sat down.

A couple at the end of the counter were setting off their own fireworks. She made it clear that she had changed her mind about him.

I sat with my coffee half-listening and half-mulling. Did she learn something that made her realize that she would never change him?

Whatever the reason, the woman got up, huffed out, and hailed a cab. The guy looked over at me and threw up his hands. I half-nodded half-smiled and returned to my coffee. It was late. I was tired and way past understanding anything.

There was another loud crack in the alley. I let it go. Max brought the pie.

“Say Roy, did you ever catch whoever vandalized the jewelry store a few doors down?”

“The smash and grab? Yeah, a couple of guys stole some expensive watches and fenced them to buy drugs. They’re locked up now.”

Max wiped his hands with the towel that hung from his waist. “They vandalize others so they can vandalize themselves. Makes no sense.”

“It makes the same sense as losing a finger or an eye playing with fireworks.”

As I was saying this, a fire engine with sirens blaring and lights flashing drove past the window. An ambulance and a squad car followed.

“I guess I better have a look.”  I paid for the coffee and the apple pie, grabbed my hat and headed for the door.

“Say hi to Laci for me, Roy.”

“Will do, Max.”

Outside, I expected the sulfurous, rotten egg-like odor given off by fireworks. But the heavy acrid smell of a fire filled the air. I could see fire trucks at Center City College campus. That’s where I headed chewing on some Black Jack gum my best girl had put in my coat pocket.

~~~

I cleared the police barricade tape with my ID and walked toward the Larks Faculty Admin Building. A fireman stood in a fifth-floor window. He radioed below to the fire chief I walked up to. The fire was out, he said, and there was a body on the floor.

“Roy, the elevator is shut off. You’ll need to walk up.”

That was the corpulent sergeant Fullman. Beads of sweat rolled down his face. He wasn’t about to walk up the five flights of stairs. So, I had to.

The climb to the fifth floor wasn’t easy. The handkerchief covering my nose and mouth didn’t keep out the sharp-tasting smoke and I was already tired from being up the past 30 hours. My heart was thumping like a freight train passing through a small town at night.

The sign on the fifth-floor office read:

Arthur J. Talbot

Professor

School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies

Inside, a fireman stood poking through a large pile of charred books. He was making sure that there were no more embers.

The shelves had been emptied. Books had been thrown into a pile next to the desk and set on fire. Everything had been doused with water. There was no vanilla-like smell of old books. There was a damp burnt wood smell.

A man’s body lay face down on the floor. I put on some nitrile gloves, knelt down, and lifted his shoulder to look at his face. The anniversary photo on the desk confirmed the dead man to be Professor Talbot.

He didn’t appear to have any wounds, but the large book he was holding – Virgil’s Aeneid in the original Latin – had large gashes in the cover. Was he holding the book to protect himself?

Before I got up, I noticed something under the desk. I stuck my arm under and pulled out a wooden replica of a tall ship. The engraved brass label read USS Constitution, “Old Ironsides1797. A third of the ship had burnt away. I handed it to the fireman.

I searched the pockets of his tweed jacket, his waistcoat, and his pants. His wallet, his wedding band and his watch had not been taken. It wasn’t robbery. It was someone with a grudge making a deadly point.

The fireman pointed to the waste basket. “The fire started there.”

“How did it spread to the books.”

“Accelerant was used in the bin and on the books. Someone lit some paper, threw it in the bin and then dumped the blaze on the books.”

I stood back trying to imagine the scene and then went to the open window. I stuck my head out and yelled down to sergeant Fullman “Send up forensics.” The outside air didn’t clear my head. There was a pungent taste in my mouth. I tossed my gum out the window.

Ten minutes later, two white-coveralled techs with masks make it to the fifth floor. One of them starts taking pictures. The other examines the professor’s skull.

“I see no injuries. He might have been overcome trying to put out the fire and died of smoke inhalation.”

I left the techs to their work. I had to go back outside. My stomach didn’t know what to do with the taste in my mouth.

“Roy, what did you find out?” Sargent Fullman asked from his bench perch. I told him that it looked like a homicide. “Crime never sleeps, Roy. Not even on a holiday.”

“You better go home, Sarge. Mrs. Sarge will be worried about you in this heat.”

I stood there blowing my nose and looking around at the crowd that had gathered behind the police tape. Some of the onlookers were holding protest signs. One very anxious woman stood out. It was the woman in the photo.

I pulled her out from the line and brought her to a quiet spot.

“Ma’am, I’m Detective Winder. Are you Mrs. Talbot?”

“Yes, detective. I’m Alice Talbot. Is my husband OK?”

“I’m afraid, Mrs. Talbot, that your husband has passed. I’m looking into what happened.”

This news had her crumble into my arms and then she pulled back. The smell of smoke on my clothes had her wondering horrible things. I told her that her husband’s books had been burnt but that he was untouched by the fire.

She looked over at the protestors. I figured they were adding more pain to an already painful night for Mrs. Talbot.

“Mrs. Talbot, do you have someone you can stay with tonight?”

“My daughter.”

“I would like to talk to you again, tomorrow. Is that OK?”

“Yes, detective.”

“Just one question tonight. Why was your husband here on campus so late at night before a holiday?”

“He was to give the Fourth of July speech . . . at the bandshell in Larks Park . . . before the fireworks. He told me that he wanted to make sure it was his best. He said it would likely be his last.”

“Why did he think it would be his last speech?”

“Some students filed complaints against him. They thought his teaching was biased or not biased enough. I don’t know.” She looked over again at the protestors.

I had an officer wait with Mrs. Talbot until her daughter arrived.

I went home, put my clothes in a dry cleaner’s bag, put my gum on the dresser, took a shower, and then slipped into bed next to my best girl.

~~~

I woke up two hours later when I heard the TV. Laci had the news on.

“Fifty-nine-year-old Professor Arthur J. Talbot, a professor at Center City College, was found dead in his office. There are reports that his books had been destroyed in the fire.

“One colleague described Professor Talbot as the pillar of the School of Humanities, Arts and Cultural Studies. Professor Talbot authored several books about philosophy, ethics, and religious studies. 

“He is most well-known for his books Minds Made Up: Ideology as Identity and Zero-Sum Culture and The Leveling of Society.

“He is survived by his wife Alice, two children and seven grandchildren.”

I turned the TV off when Laci reminded me that it was the Fourth. I had hoped to spend it with her on the patio with some ice-cold lemonade and a couple of steaks on the grill. But murder has a way of deciding for others.

I called Mrs. Talbot and her daughter answered. I told her that I needed to spend a few minutes with Mrs. Talbot.

“Come right over. The family will be here soon. It’s 208 Larks Avenue, a brownstone across from Larks Park.”

It was the start of one of those searing and sultry days of summer. The package of Black Jack gum in my coat pocket was getting soft, too soft. I wanted to shed my suit coat, loosen my tie, and open my collar. But I had to look like business. I hoped the Talbot place had AC.

When I arrived, Mrs. Talbot’s daughter opened the door.

I addressed mother and daughter. “I am sorry for your loss. I am curious. Is there anyone who would want to hurt your husband, your father?”

Mrs. Talbot wiped her eyes. “I can’t think of anyone directly. But there are students who don’t like what he taught, don’t like what he wrote. The department chair received student complaints about his teaching style, his course content, and his courses on ethics and religion. He was penalized in his annual performance review for a bias toward Christianity.”

Mrs. Talbot wiped her eyes again. “I saw the protestors last night again. I saw them at his last talk on campus. I see them outside our house with signs.”

“Has a protestor ever harmed you or your husband.”

“Not directly. But we don’t feel safe in our home or leaving our home. Now they’ve had their way with him.” She couldn’t continue and laid her head on her daughter’s shoulder.

I asked the daughter if she knew of anyone specifically who had filed a complaint.

“I think my father said her name is Madison with a ‘y’ . . . Madisyn Sawyer. She lives directly across from us on the other side of the park.” She walked over to the window. “Right there.” She pointed to a four-story apartment building.

Before I left, I told them that there would be an autopsy to determine the cause of death. I would let them know what I find out.

“Detective,” Mrs. Talbot lifted her head, “Arthur was to give the Fourth of July speech today over at the bandshell across the street. He showed me the third draft of the speech. He went to the college last night to finish it – something about wanting to make sure of a Latin phrase from Virgil’s Aeneid.”

“Do you know what phrase he was thinking about?”

Tu ne cede malis, sed contra audentior ito. It translates as ‘do not give in to evil but proceed ever more boldly against it.’”

“Ma’am, I wish I could have heard him deliver that speech.”

As I opened the door, a couple was just about to enter.

“Who are you?” asked the man.

“I’m Detective Winder. And you?”

“I’m her son Matthew and this is my wife, Mandy. Any information on my father’s death?”

I told him that I was there to find out who might want to harm his father. I asked him and he said that he knew of no one. I told them there will be an autopsy to determine the cause of death and that I would be in touch when I had more.

Walking down the sidewalk, I noticed someone standing with his bike across the street. He was watching the Talbot house. I decided to walk across the park to question Madison with a ‘y’. When he saw me coming in his direction, he got on his bike a rode away.

 ~~~

I make my way over and up to Madisyn Sawyer’s fourth-floor studio apartment. I knock. A short round woman with fuchsia-streaked pixie hair and an assortment of piercings and tattoos answered. I identify myself.

“The police! Are you here to arrest me?”

“Do I need to?”

“Isn’t that what police do, detective? Arrest people and find them guilty?”

“I’ll let you know. Ms. Sawyer. I’m looking into the events of last night and the death of Professor Talbot.”

 “Come in.”

“Ms. Sawyer, I understand that you filed a complaint against professor Talbot. Is that correct?”

“Yes, detective. I had issues with his Introduction to Ethics and Issues in Death and Dying class. He had us reading Thomas Aquinas and asking us about the “highest good.”

“Is that a problem?”

“There are other perspectives, detective.”

“Were you aware that Professor Talbot was at his office last night?”

“Yeah. I was down on the third floor working on my Master’s thesis. I wanted to finish some research before the holiday. Professor Talbot came down to talk about my research for my dissertation. Then he went back up to the fifth floor, I think.”

“What time was that?”

“Around eight eight-thirty, I think. Before I went home, I went up to ask him about some research I came across. But he wasn’t there.”

“Was anyone else around the fifth floor then?”

No. But there was someone coming up the stairs as I was going down. “

“Describe him.”

“He looked like a high-schooler. He had black hair. He was skinny. Wore jeans and a black hooded sweatshirt and sneakers.”

“Anything else?”

“He was carrying a bicycle tire pump.”

I look around the studio apartment. Two bikes and two backpacks leaned against the wall. Outside the small open kitchen area there was a table with two chairs. On the table was a lit oil candle. On the wall was a TV the size of a billboard. The room filled out with a well-used arm hair holding a cat that couldn’t be bothered and a futon with protest signs leaning against it. Books were scattered around in piles. I scan some of the titles.

“These titles . . .? You don’t agree with what Professor Talbot teaches?”

“Is that a crime?”

“Only if it’s not by the book.”

I notice a photo on the refrigerator door.

“Who is this?” I was looking at a photo of a smiling Ms. Sawyer and a severe-looking dark-haired guy.

“That’s Hadrien Marie. We share the apartment.”

“Does he attend the college?”

“Oh no. He owns a vape shop on third street. He’s there now.”

I give her my card and ask her to call me if she hears anything about last night.

I came away with the impression that Ms. Sawyer’s prerogative was not used to change her mind, as they used to say of women. It was her prerogative to impose change on other people’s minds. She came across as a protest.

~~~

I grab another stick of Black Jack gum from my pocket and walk over to the college to ask about CCTV of last night.

The building superintendent tells me that there are cameras on the exterior of the building, the first-floor entrance, and hallway cameras. I ask to see the exterior footage from last night starting at nine-o’clock.

Just after nine, I see the man that Ms. Sawyer described entering the building.

I ask for the footage of the first-floor camera starting at nine. I see the black-hooded young man with jeans and the bicycle pump entering the building and heading up the stairs. I ask for the footage of the third-floor camera. It shows the hooded man heading up the stairs and Ms. Sawyer going down the stairs.

The fifth-floor footage shows the hooded man reaching the top of the stairs. He enters the professor’s office. He’s in there for three minutes and leaves.

The first-floor video shows him leaving the building minutes later. The exterior video shows him getting on his bike and riding off.

I need to find this young man. I capture a screen shot of him on the first floor. The image of him was a bit blurry but there was enough to show people. There was enough to show me that this guy looked a lot like the same guy watching the Talbot house. I walk back to the Talbot house.

~~~

Matthew opens the door. “Anything yet, detective?”

“I want to show your mother a picture.”

Mrs. Talbot is seating on the couch surrounded by her grandchildren. I have her look at the screen image.

“No. I don’t know him.” She handed the picture to her son.

“Has anyone noticed a young guy standing across the street watching your house?”

“What?” Matthew went over to the street window and looked out. “He’s there right now, detective.”

“Do you recognize him?”

“I . . . well . . . that might be the kid that used to vandalize our house when we were at church. That was years ago. Matthew looked at the photo again. “Yeah, that could be him.”

Mrs. Talbot came to the window. “There was a boy in our neighborhood who seemed to hate us. We’d come home from church and find the top of our tulips cut off. We’d find our garbage cans knocked over. We’d find dead animals in out mail box. We’d find our car tires flat. He’d ride by on his bike yelling all kinds of nasty things. In my day we called kids like that juvenile delinquents.”

“Mom, they’re called young offenders today, as if a change of designation was social progress. And, that kid was Brandon . . . Brandon Brix. I had a few run ins with him.”

I go out the door to speak with the young man. But he gets on his bike and rides off.

I leave the Talbots and walk to the station. I need to find out more about Brandon Brix.

Brandon, according to the police blotter, had committed a couple of misdemeanors at the age of twelve. He had been charged with defacing school property with spray paint and with petty theft of tools taken from several garages. He was sentenced to six months in juvenile detention and then placed on parole for a year. Brandon is now eighteen. He lives on Shore Oaks drive with his mother. That’s where I headed next.

I drive up to the Brix house and see a bicycle laying on the grass. I knock. A fiftyish woman with heavy bags under eyes answers.

“Mrs. Brix?”

“Yes. Who are you?”

“I’m detective Winder. I need to speak to Brandon.”

“Oh no. Don’t tell me he’s back to his old ways.”

“That’s what I’m here to find out, ma’am.”

“Brandon! Come down here!”

The young man I had seen across the street and in the screen-capture came down the stairs. He looked scared.

“Brandon, I’m detective Winder. I am investigating what happened to Professor Talbot last night. Cameras have you at the college last night. Cameras have you going into Professor’s Talbot’s office. Can you explain?”

“Oh, Brandon, you didn’t, did you?”

“No ma. I was there to apologize to Professor Talbot. I finally worked up the courage to face him. I watched him go to the college last night. I waited till there wasn’t anyone around. I just wanted to talk to him. I had messed with him and his family when I was a kid.”

“Detective, I divorced my no-good husband when Brandon was ten. He had a lot of anger over that. That’s what’s at the root of his troubles.”

“So, Brandon, you were there to apologize to the Professor?

“Yes sir. But the Professor wasn’t in his office. I didn’t want to walk around to find him. I didn’t belong there in the first place. So, I wrote him a note and left it on his desk. I wanted to take responsibility for the way I acted toward him and his family.”

“Ma’am, sounds like Brandon figured out what was at the root of his troubles. It was his bad behavior.”

“Brandon, that is a noble of you,” his mother hugged him.

“You saw no fire?”

“No sir. I heard about what happened to Professor Talbot on TV. I went over to their house hoping for a time to speak with Mrs. Talbot alone. But people were coming and going.”

“Why were your carrying a bicycle pump, Brandon?”

“I didn’t want it stolen. I used to steal things when I was a kid so I knew what could happen.”

I asked Brandon to come to the station to make a statement. I needed to establish a timeline, talk to the medical examiner, talk to forensics, and review the videos from the administration building. If Brandon didn’t start the fire, then who did?

~~~

I met with the medical examiner and the deceased.

“Roy, toxic fumes, not flames, were the primary cause of death. There are no major burn injuries or grievous external wounds, no blunt force trauma found that could be attributed as the direct cause of death. “

“Note the swelling around the faces and eyes. And there is soot and smoke particles inside his nasal passages. He inhaled large quantities of smoke which may have caused a fatal heart attack. I’ll know more later.

“You know Roy, he could have left the room to breathe in clean air. But he must have stayed inside trying to put out the fire destroying his books. He also could have used the fire extinguisher in the hall, but maybe he didn’t want that powder on his books. Maybe he thought he could put out the fire.”

Mike in forensics had more to report.

“Roy, the fire started in the garbage bin next to the desk. It was started with an accelerant – liquid paraffin. Liquid paraffin is used in lamps and candles. The building administrator said that no candles or lamps or anything flammable is allowed in the building. And no smoking and vaping is allowed within a hundred feet of entrances and exits. Someone brought in the liquid paraffin and lit it up.”

I asked Mike for pictures of the scene. I was hoping to find Brandon’s note to Professor Talbot.

“Roy, whatever paper was on the desk must have been pushed into the garbage bin. Here are pics of the charred scraps that had floated up from the fire and landed in the room.”

All but one document had been typewritten. The one handwritten scrap had “Mr. Talbot.” The rest of the note had burned off.

The videos were next. I start with the fifth-floor video at eight last night.

I see Professor Talbot walking down the stairs with a paper in his hands. I follow him to the third floor. He stops to talk to Ms. Sawyer. He hands her a paper. She looks it over and looks rather unhappy.

The Professor goes back to the fifth floor but he doesn’t go to his office. He goes to an office several doors down. He stays there for an hour. I call the college and ask about the office. I learn that it is Professor Cline’s office. He’s a close friend of Professor Talbot.

I call Professor Cline and ask about that meeting. He says that Professor Talbot wanted to go over his speech with him. He confirmed the time.

I watch the fifth-floor video and see Brandon go into Talbot’s office for three minutes and then leave. Professor Talbot was still down the hall.

Minutes later, Ms. Sawyer reaches the fifth floor and looks into Professor Talbot’s office. Then she walks halfway down the hall and then walks back to his office and goes in. She’s in the office for six minutes and then heads down the stairs.

Fifteen minutes later, Professor Talbot leaves Professor Cline’s office. Professor Clines heads down the stairs with his briefcase. Professor Talbot goes to the men’s room. He leaves the men’s room after a few minutes and returns to his office. He does not come out. He is not seen again. I see smoke. The automated sprinkler system must have gone off.

Ms. Sawyer was the last to enter the office. Or, was she? Old buildings like the Larks building have fire escapes. Was the office window opened by the fire department or had it been opened by someone using the fire escape to vandalize the office and start the fire?

Before I go to review the building’s exterior camera video, I call the fire department. The chief asks around and says that every fireman up on the fifth floor thought that the victim had opened the window.

I watch the video from building’s main entrance exterior camera. I see Brandon unchaining his bike and then riding off. Ten minutes later I see Ms. Sawyer with her backpack doing the same. The fire started after she left the Professor’s office. Was she in on it?

I rewind the exterior night footage video and then advance it slowly.

A figure appears on the far left. It looks like a black-hooded man with a backpack. He’s about the same height as Brandon but Brandon didn’t have a backpack when he left the building. The figure comes near the building. I switch to the building’s corner camera video to view the fire escape. Only the outside railing of the fire escape is visible in the video, but I can see movement on the fire escape each time the figure passes a lit window.

I check the main entrance video and the internal videos again. I don’t see the black-hooded man. He must have gone up the fire escape.

I watch and watch. I can’t see the fifth-floor window but smoke begins pouring out at that level. Minutes later I see the hooded figure walk away from the fire escape. The figure tosses something into a garbage can by the sidewalk. He gets on a bike and rides away.

I send Mike of forensics to check out the trash can on the campus. He calls after twenty minutes and tells me that he found a fire starter and a bottle of liquid paraffin. I tell him to grab the finger prints from both and to finger print the fire escape near the fifth-floor and the window. Our suspect has left his mark.

The campus has plenty of people walking around with backpacks. There were two at Ms. Sawyers place. And there was an oil candle.

An hour later I get the results. The finger prints match Hadrian Marie, the owner of a vape shop on third street. He had previously been arrested for criminal damage to property – fire damage to a church. He was more severe than he looked.

I get a probable cause warrant from the DA to search the studio apartment. I take Mike and two officers with me. The fireworks over at Larks Park were about to begin.

~~~

Back at the station, I put Ms. Sawyer in one interview room and Mr. Marie in another.

Mike calls me and says he’s pretty sure that one of the backpacks has liquid paraffin spilled on the bottom. And he found a black-hooded sweatshirt that smells like smoke in the hamper. He’s on his way back to the station with the items to analyze them.

I interview Ms. Sawyer first. I want to know if she was involved.

“Why am I here, detective? Why is Hadrian here?”

“Ms. Sawyer, video from last night has Professor Talbot handing you some papers and you looking very unhappy. What was that about?”

“I asked Professor Talbot to review my Master’s thesis. He said that before I narrowed my focus and framed my argument, I needed to broaden my perspective. He said I needed a more thorough review of existing literature to identify gaps in my thesis. He said that I needed to consider not only what I agreed with but also what I disagreed with. He handed me some resources to critically review.”

“Did this upset you?”

“Well, yeah. I was frustrated. I mean, I’d already spent a lot of time on the thesis and thought I had nailed it.”

“Ms. Sawyer, after you left the admin building last night, did you go straight home?”

“Yes.”

“Was Hadrian home when you arrived?”

“No. He came home later. He had to close the Vape shop. Why?

“Sit tight.” I leave the room and go talk to Mike.

“Roy, on the bottom of both backpacks there are drops of liquid paraffin. It’s the same liquid paraffin used in the candle. The fire investigator says It’s the same liquid paraffin that was used as an accelerant.”

“Thanks Mike.”

I head to Interview Room 2 to question the wild-eyed Mr. Marie.

I enter and find him standing in the corner with his arms crossed and a mean mug.

“Why are we here? And shouldn’t you be out watching your glorious American fireworks?”

“Mr. Marie, I am detective Winder. Have a seat.”

“Now, Mr. Marie, where were you last night between 9 PM and 10:30?”

“At my shop. Till ten. Then I went home.”

“Mr. Marie, we searched your apartment and found things that tie you to the fire and the death of Professor Talbot.’

“What?! How can that be. I was at my shop. I was at home.”

“We found traces of liquid paraffin in your backpack. It’s the same liquid paraffin that is used for the candle in your apartment. It’s the same liquid paraffin that accelerated the fire in the professor’s office.”

Mike walks in and hands me the finger print results.

“It appears, Mr. Marie, that you’ve left a trail of finger prints on the fifth-floor fire escape and on the office window and on the office trash can and on the fire starter and bottle of liquid paraffin found in the trash can adjacent to the admin building. It appears that you’ve crossed a bridge and burned it behind you.”

“What are you taking about?”

“I saw the plaque on the wall of your apartment.” I look at my notes. “It says . . .

“You are America. Unconstrained by habit and convention. Unencumbered by what is, ready to seize what ought to be. For everywhere in this country, there are first steps to be taken, there is new ground to cover, there are more bridges to be crossed. Obama, right?”

“Madisyn called me, Mr. Dick, and told me what the old guy said about her paper. She tells me everything that guy says. She told me that students complained about his teaching style and course content. They complained about his courses on ethics and religion, his Christian bias. He never includes teaching about decolonizing and anti-racism. He never includes the things that really matter!

“The “greater good!” Hah! He knows nothing about the “greater good” when there is so much injustice and so much inequality in the world!

“So yeah, I came in the window. Yeah, I threw the books on the floor. Yeah, I lit the fire. It was a statement. A statement against his old tired way of thinking. He’s stuck in the past. He needed a wakeup call.”

“Mr. Marie, did you strike Mr. Talbot?

“He came at me as I was going out the window. I only had the fire starter to protect myself. So, I swung it at him.”

Mr. Marie, did you strike Mr. Talbot?

“I struck the book he put up to his face. He was alive when I went out the window.”

“Professor Talbot perished from the fire. And now Mrs. Talbot, her children, her grandchildren and his many students must suffer the injustice and inequality of your act.”

At this point, I read Mr. Marie his rights.

“Detective, Madisyn has nothing to do with this. I waited by the window until Madisyn left the building. I didn’t want her involved.”

“We’ll see about that. Hadrian Marie, you willfully started a fire to intimidate Mr. Talbot. You are being charged with arson and the involuntary manslaughter of Mr. Talbot. Your unconstrained habits and convention will be remanded into custody. You will be encumbered by it is.”

“I want a lawyer.”

I returned to Interview Room 1 and Ms. Sawyer.

“Ms. Sawyer, video from last night has you going up to the fifth-floor, looking into Professor Talbot’s office, then walking halfway down the hall, and then walking back to his office. You are in there for six minutes.”

I show her the video.

“It looks to me that you checked Professor Talbot’s office to see if he was in there. He wasn’t. Then you hear his voice. You walk down the hallway and hear him talking with Professor Cline. Then, you go back to Professor Talbot’s office. What were you doing in there?”

“I was . . .I was writing a note about the research I found.”

“Did you see another handwritten note on the desk?

“Yeah. I looked like something a kid wrote to Professor Talbot.”

“Ms. Sawyer, we found your finger prints on the books piled on the floor. We also found your finger prints on the window you opened for Hadrian. And, we also found drops of liquid paraffin in your backpack – both backpacks found at your apartment.”

“It was supposed to be a statement, detective.”

“You mean you were showing him a different perspective when you tossed his books into a pile on the floor, opened the window for Hadrian, handed him the liquid paraffin and then left. You will be charged with second degree murder in the commission of felony arson.”

“The last wound the professor suffered, Ms. Sawyer, was fatal. He was trying to put out the fire consuming his books. His fifty-nine-year-old heart gave out. He died of smoke inhalation and heart failure.”

At this point, I read Ms. Sawyer her rights.

~~~

Back at my desk, I make a note to call Mrs. Talbot in the morning. I’ll tell her about Mr. Marie and Ms. Madison with a ‘y’, and about Brandon Brix. I put it in my pocket with the pack of Black Jack gum.

I call my best girl.

“Roy, the fireworks are over.”

“Laci, I wrapped the case. I’ve been crisscrossing the campus all day long. My dogs are killing me and I’m beat. Listen, darling, tomorrow I’ll make sure there are lots of fireworks and then we’ll grill some steaks and watch The Thin Man.

“You never change, Roy.”

“That’s why you love me. See you soon.”

~~

©J.A. Johnson, Kingdom Venturers, 2026, All Rights Reserved

Transit

I experienced my first water crossing at the age of eight. My father made it happen.

My mother wanted to visit her sister in Muskegon, MI. We lived in Chicago. So, instead of taking the mapped route – driving through northern Indiana around the bottom of Lake Michigan and up to Muskegon – my father booked us on a car ferry that would carry us from Manitowoc, WI to Ludington, MI over Lake Michigan.

When the four of us that included my younger brother arrived at the ferry port in Manitowoc, a porter drove the car onto the ferry boat. We boarded and headed up to the top deck. The lake passage would take four hours.

Seeing the size of the boat, the cars rolling aboard, the expanse of water all around, the sunset and then the harbor lights on the other side and hearing the booming blast of the ferry horn, smelling and tasting the earthy lake air, and running around the decks wearing the white captain caps with black bills that my father bought for me and my brother –  I was no longer in the bathtub with floating toys.

Dad liked to drive back roads to get to destinations. The car ferry was another. He liked to explore and put himself in new situations. My mother liked the familiar, the safe familiar. She expressed her concerns and then went with dad.

My father put himself in positions that would stretch him. After attending the Moody Bible Institute with my mother (I was born while they attended as married students), he pastored a tiny church in the frozen north of Minnesota. But, with me and then a brother coming along a year later, a better paying job was required.

My father, with family in tow, returned to Chicago. He studied traffic management and was hired to work as the shipping manager for ServiceMaster. As the family grew, he went on to work various jobs, mostly in sales. There were times when he worked a second job at night. He did what he had to do. He worked to provide for us. My father made that happen and he did more.

While the jobs paid the bills and provided for those under his care, he continued to stretch himself. This latter was not a fear of missing out on some experience. This was, perhaps, a fear of missing out on the desire that brought him to MBI many years before. He served as a Sunday School teacher, as a church chairman, as a village trustee, and then as village mayor.

Dad and mom served on the missions committee of the church. On Sundays after church, they hosted meals for furloughed missionaries from all over the world including Ecuador, Japan, the Congo, and Wycliffe Bible translators from New Zealand. They also hosted professors who spoke at our church, professors such as classical Christian apologist Norman Geisler from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. Those meals in our home exposed me to a bigger-than-me world, just as the car ferry passage did.

That water crossing was not just exposure to a novel experience, it was exposure to my father’s heart, to his momentum to see beyond and go beyond. There were other experiences with my father: going to Riverview amusement park in Chicago, going to a Cub’s game at Wrigley Field, playing taps on my trumpet at a Memorial Day event where my father, as mayor, gave a speech. The Bach trumpet I played was a gift from my father before I entered high school. And there were the aforementioned times when I was present to the man who took on serving roles.   

My passage from the pre-adult pre-parenting years with all of the childish outsized expectations, demands, and responses to that of becoming a parent and a context of doing what must be done day in and day out and also stretching myself to be more began with the transit across Lake Michigan. My father, now in the presence of the Lord, made that happen.

~~~

Musical Chairs

The calls come when I’m in the shower or in a dream. Tonight, a call interrupted someone with a buzzsaw chasing me down a dark alley.

“Roy, if you pick that up it stops making noise.”

“Huh? I love you, too, Laci. Put the buzzsaw down.”

“Roy, pick up that hum-buzzing thing.”

“Huh . . . Oh . . .Hello?”

My sister-in-law Diane was on the phone. She was in a state.

“Roy, it’s Dutch.”

“What’s happened?”

“Dutch hasn’t come home from yesterday’s rehearsal,” her voice broke. “I called and called and when he finally picked up, he sounded drunk, incoherent.”

“Where is he now?”

“I don’t . . .wait . . .he’s walking in the door right now . . . Oh no! I see why he sounded like that. You should see for yourself.”

I told her I would come right over.

“Roy, what is it?”

“Diane says something happened to Dutch.”

I kiss Laci, get dressed, and head over to my brother’s place.

My older brother Dutch plays trumpet for Center City Symphony Orchestra. He auditioned for the group fifteen years ago and was appointed Principal Trumpet chair. I went in a different musical direction. I blow the whistle on the bad guys as lead detective for Center City.

I arrive at my brother’s house and go inside. Diane, teary eyed, runs up to me.

“Look what they did to him, Roy.”

“Who?” I walk into the living room.

“Someone . . .  someone did this to him.”

Dutch was sitting in an arm chair holding an ice pack on his face. His eyes were glazed over. I ask to look at the damage.

His nose and mouth were bloodied. He had a fat lip and two front teeth had been knocked out. Not good for someone who makes a living with serious chops.

“You won’t need stitches, Dutch, but you’ll a need couple of teeth.

“And, he’ll need months to recover his embouchure!” Diane sobbed.

Dutch coughed spitting out blood. “I wasssupposed to play the Haydn Trumpet Concerto homorrow night.”

“Who did this to you, Dutch?”

“Hats just it,” Dutch moaned, “I dunnooo. I wasss backssstage with my horn and sssomeone called my name. I turned and whhaamm ha stage curtain hit me. I fell back and hit my hhhead.”

“Stage curtain?”

“Like a cannonbawll.”

“Did anyone see what happened?”

“I dunnooo,” he gulped. “Whhhen I came to my hhhead hurrd my mouth hurrd and my trumpet bell was smashed.

Diane brought another bag of ice and a shot of bourbon.

“Roy, they took him to the emergency room and kept him there for observation. They were worried about a concussion. Dutch said that the orchestra manager was there fretting about him not being able to play and the Center manager was there fretting about liability. I should have been there fretting over Dutch.”

I told them that I would go to the Arts Center later that morning to investigate. Before I left, I almost told Dutch to keep a stiff upper lip. But he was in no mood for kidding.

“Roy, find out wahhappened. Will ya?”

I promised I would.

 ~~~

After a couple of hours of sleep and a cup of black coffee with my best girl, I drive over to Central City Performing Arts Center to meet with the orchestra manager. It looked to be a long wet Friday. I needed something to offset the feeling I had in my gut. I stop and buy a couple of boxes of Good and Plenty.

Over at the Center, I introduce myself to the bowtied Mr. Caldecott. I ask about yesterday’s rehearsal.

“Well Detective, I arrived at noon yesterday to set up the chairs, stands, and music for the afternoon rehearsal. But the stage curtain was still down from the previous theater performance, so nothing could be placed. I went and asked the Center’s custodian to raise the curtain. An hour later the curtain was raised and then someone told me that our Principal Trumpet had been injured.”

“When exactly did the curtain go up?”

“The curtain didn’t go up until two. So, rehearsal started at three-thirty, not the usual three.”

“When do the orchestra members show up”

“Usually, it’s an hour before rehearsal begins. They warm up and review the music.”

Mr. Caldecott then informed me that only the sound technician and the custodian were around when he arrived yesterday. He walked me over to the sound booth at the back of the auditorium.

The sound tech said that he had been waiting for the stage curtain to go up and the chairs and stands to be in place so he could set up the microphones for the rehearsal. He said he spent his time waiting in the sound booth and was too far away to see anything going on off stage.

Mr. Caldecott then walked me backstage so I could talk to the custodian.

The custodian was a short bald-headed old guy with a pasty face, red nose, and scraps of hair for a mustache. His uniform name patch said “Charlie.”

“Charlie, I’m a detective investigating what happened yesterday before rehearsal.” I didn’t mention my name. I didn’t want my relationship with Dutch brought into the matter.

“A detective, heh? Say, don’t you guys wear trench coats and fedoras?”

“Yeah, when we’re playing a part. But I’m not playing anything right now. Someone received a serious blow to the face.”

I ask them to show me where it happened.” I follow them to stage left.

“Mr. Caldecott said the curtain was down yesterday. He asked you to raise it. He also said that it took an hour before it was raised. Isn’t that right Mr. Caldecott?”

“Yes, detective.”

“Well, Charlie, what took so long?”

“The curtain was down and that pulley you’re looking at had broken loose from the floor boards. So, I had to bolt it down to lift the curtain for the rehearsal. You can see the new bolts.”

I tell Mr. Caldecott that I need the curtain lowered to inspect it. He goes to move some things on stage before the curtain can be lowered.

The stage curtain down, I find graze marks in the fabric. And specks of blood. On the other side of the location of the scuff marks are more scuff marks. Directly below is the remounted curtain pulley.

“Was the pulley loose when the guy got clobbered?”

“Yes, detective.”

“So, anyone could have come along and swung it into Mr. Winder’s face?”

“I suppose that’s possible.”

“Don’t touch the pulley.”

I call the station and ask Ted to come right over. I want him to dust the pulley for fingerprints and to swab the blood on the curtain.

“Where were you when the trumpet player got clobbered?”

“Well, let’s see . . . I . . . I was looking for wood screws to tie down the pulley. Is that all detective?”

“Yeah, for now.” There were some loose ends that needed tying up.

“Mr. Caldecott, you said someone came and told you what had happened to the Principal Trumpet. Who was that?”

He gives me Nelia Swan’s phone number and address. I call her and tell her that I’m on my way over to talk.

I arrive at Ms. Swan’s flat and she invites me in. She offers me some Mariage Frères tea. I tell her a cup of café noir would be great.

“What?”

“A cup of joe.”

“Sorry detective. I don’t have coffee.”

“I’ll live.”

I move the cat from the arm chair and sit down.

I ask Nelia about what happened at the rehearsal.

“Dutch and I arrived early. We were off stage warming up. We were waiting for the stage curtain to go up so chairs could be set up on the stage.”

“Where was Dutch?”

“Dutch was standing near the stage entrance playing intervals.”

“Where were you?”

“I was further off stage warming up.”

“Did you see what happened?”

“One minute Dutch was standing there and the next he was on the floor. I didn’t see him get hit in the mouth. I don’t know how that could happen.”

“Did you see anyone behind the curtain? Did you hear someone call his name?”

“No. I put my horn down to help Dutch.”

“Is there anyone who has a grudge against Dutch?”

“No. I can’t think of anyone. He’s liked by everyone.”

“He was hit right in the kisser. Anyone want him out as Principal Trumpet?”

“We’re all professionals here, detective. If a person wanted to move up in the orchestra, he or she would have to audition for that spot, but only if it is vacated by a musician who leaves the orchestra.”

“So, if Dutch was out another trumpet player could audition for his spot?”

“Yes.”

“Who is second chair trumpet?’

“His name is Mark . . . Mark Jacobson.”

I thank Nelia and make my way back to the station to do some paperwork and call the orchestra manager. I ask for Mark Jacobson’s phone number. I need to talk to him.

I call Mr. Jacobson and ask him to come to the station. He was more than a little flustered. He was practicing for the Haydn and didn’t want be bothered. I told him I’d come over.

I drove over to Jacobson’s place.

“Mr. Jacobson, I’m a detective investigating what happened yesterday before rehearsal.”

“What the hell! I shouldn’t be bothered right now. I have to play the Haydn tomorrow night!”

I reminded him why he was playing the Haydn. He softened a bit. “That’s too bad. Dutch didn’t deserve that.” Then, he whiplashed back. “I deserve a chance to be Principal Trumpet. Tomorrow is my chance. If it goes well, I’ll be the Principal Trumpet of the Center City Symphony!”

“Where were you when Dutch was assaulted, Mr. Jacobson?”

“Assaulted? What? How do you figure?”

“I figure that stage curtains don’t attack people.”

“The man had a habit of annoying people.”

“That’s not what I heard.”

“Well, you didn’t sit next to him for ten years.”

“Dutch is my brother. He annoyed me alright and I annoyed him back. That’s what brothers do. Did Dutch annoy you and you wanted to punch him in the face?”

“C’mon. I’m a professional. I need to get back to my performance.”

“Where were you when Dutch was assaulted, Mr. Jacobson?”

“I was on my way to the rehearsal.”

I left Mr. Jacobson to his Haydn.

Driving back to the station I thought about our conversation. Mr. Jacobson was certainly annoyed by me. He had a short fuse. Was it due to stress about playing the Haydn? Did he have anger issues? Did he resent Dutch being Principal Trumpet and decide to take the chair out from under him?

I would question him again, after his performance. In the meantime, I would check on Dutch.

Diane met me at the door.

“He’s sleeping now, Roy. He’s scheduled for dental implants next week. The conductor was here about an hour ago. He said he would tell the subscribers that Dutch had taken ill and needed some time off.”

I asked Diane if she knew the second trumpet Mr. Jacobson.

“I know Mark. He was in the high school band and orchestra with me and Dutch.”

“The three of you have known each other since high school?”

“Yes. And after high school the three of us played in the civic orchestra before being accepted in the symphony orchestra.”

“If I recall, you played the French horn?”

“Yes. But with three kids I had to leave the orchestra and stay home.”

“Did Mark have any issues with Dutch back then?

“Dutch was first chair trumpet during high school. Mark challenged him a few times for the chair. But he was never able to get it. Dutch was too good.”

“Challenged?”

“In high school band and orchestra, a player could challenge a higher ranked player for their chair. The director would set up a music test, listen to both and decide who gets what chair. That doesn’t happen in professional orchestras. You audition when you first come in and then sit where you are told to sit.”

“So, Mark might have resented Dutch’s ability?

“He really wanted first chair. But then he became first chair trumpet when Dutch and I had to leave high school. I became pregnant with Celeste.”

“I see. Anything else about Mr. Jacobson?”

“I was told at the time that Mark had a crush on me. Maybe he thought I was looking at him when I was looking over at Dutch. Do you think Mark did this to Dutch?

“I think I need to have another conversation with Mr. Jacobson.”

~~~

Sunday morning, around nine, I drive over to Mr. Jacobson’s place.

He invites me in. I ask about the Haydn.

“It went very well. My improvised cadenza would have been better if I had more time to prepare, but the audience liked my performance.”

“Say, Mr. Jacobson. How badly do you want first chair?”

“I don’t like your manner.”

“Yeah. I get that a lot in this business. Listen Mr. Jacobson, I know you were in competition with Dutch in high school.”

“Yeah. So what. I have ambition like the next guy.”

“I’ve been a copper long enough to see ambition and improvisation go together like Bonnie & Clyde.”

“Oh, c’mon. Sure. I was a bit jealous of Dutch, his talent, but I would never harm him. I wanted the chair honestly. I have another performance this afternoon, so I really must ask you to leave.”

I left Mr. Jacobson to his Haydn. I didn’t tell him that I had attended Saturday night’s performance.

As I sat in the balcony waiting for the conductor to walk on stage, I read the program notes. I learned about concertos.

A concerto, the program said, features a soloist engaged in an elaborate conversation with an orchestra. A solo instrument is set off against an orchestral ensemble by alternation, competition, and combination. Concertos typically contain three movements, the first and last of which are usually quick-paced, with a slower tempo for the middle movement.

This case has the elements of a concerto. Someone was set off against the orchestral ensemble that included Dutch as Principal Trumpet. The case has moved past the first movement – Allegro – when Dutch was clobbered to the second movement – Andante – which now is slowly unwinding the whodunnit. I’m looking forward to the final movement – Allegro – when everything comes rushing together and I blow the whistle on someone.

After the Saturday evening performance, I learned even more.

I stuck around to see Mark and Nelia get very chummy. They left the Arts Center together. I followed them to a wine bar over on Third Street. They shared some drinks, kissed, and talked for two hours. They left around eleven and drove to Nelia’s place. Mark stayed overnight and left around eight in the morning.

I didn’t press Mr. Jacobson on his relationship with Ms. Swan this morning. I wanted to talk to Ms. Swan first.

After leaving Jacobson’s place, I drove over to Ms. Swan’s flat. I knocked and she invited me in.

“Oh, detective. If I knew you were coming I would’ve bought some coffee. I was just making some tea.”

“You might need something stronger.” I cleared my throat.

“Huh?”

“No thanks on the tea.”

I walk into her living room, move the cat out of the chair, and sit down. On the lamp table was a framed photo.

“Say, this photo wasn’t here yesterday.”

“Mark gave it to me last night. That was taken in the Bahamas last summer. That’s where Mark proposed to me.” She showed me the engagement ring.

“You didn’t mention your relationship with Mark the last time I was here. Why?”

“I didn’t think it had anything to do with what happened to Dutch. Besides, Mark wouldn’t hurt a flea.”

“He comes across as a bit on edge.”

“Yeah, lately he’s been pushing himself. Trying out with different orchestra for the Principal Trumpet chair. He wants to make more so we have enough to pay for a traditional wedding. My parents are divorced and they don’t have money and we’re both still paying off student loans.”

I got up to look at the photos on the side table.

“This guy looks familiar.”

“That’s my father.”

“Isn’t he the custodian at the arts center?”

“Yes.”

The third movement was about to begin. I left Ms. Swan and drove over to the Arts Center to have a talk with the custodian. No doubt his fingerprints are all over that pulley.

~~~

Over at the Arts Center I meet with the building’s manager Mr. Fairmont. I have him show me to the custodian’s office.

Inside the cramped room is a small desk with chair, two file cabinets, a bulletin board with the orchestra’s schedule, a sleeping bag, a hotplate, cans of soup and baked beans, a bag of tools, and a duffel bag stuffed with clothes.

A bottle of Mad Dog is in the top drawer of the file cabinet with some Dime Detective Magazines and a dog-eared copy of Mickey Spillane’s Kiss Me, Deadly.

On the desk is a photo of Mr. Swan and his daughter Nelia.

“What’s all this?” The custodian came in.

“Well, look what crawled out from behind the curtain.”

“Hey, this is for employees only, detective.”

“I am employed, Charlie. Have a seat.”

“Now Mr. Swan, I want you to help me sort out a few things.”

“Yes. How can I help?”

“The day of the attack on Mr. Winder, the pulley was loose from the floor, wasn’t it Mr. Swan?”

“Attack? Why do you say he was attacked? Who would do such a thing?”

“Someone playing musical chairs.”

“What? The pulley had come loose from the floor boards. I had to get the curtain raised.”

“Your daughter is planning on marrying Mr. Mark Jacobson, is that correct?”

“Yes.”

“Are you all in on that marriage.”

“Why yes, I am. Where you going with all this?”

“I did some digging and found out that the pay scale is the same for all section players and that principals make more. Stands to reason that with Principal Trumpet Mr. Winder out of the way, your daughter’s fiancé would get the chair, get more pay, and then marry your daughter”

“If you say so.”

“I do and so does the logic.”

“I did some more digging and found out that you like to drink and gamble and that’s how you lost your wife and your house. You are now living here. Isn’t that so, Mr. Swan?”

I looked over at the manager of the Arts Center.

“I had no idea that you were living here, Charlie.”

“I . . . I. “

“Did you daughter know that you lost your house and were living here?”

“No. No. No. I don’t want her to find out and worry about me. She doesn’t know about the house. We see each other here every time the orchestra plays.”

“With Mr. Jacobson coming into more pay and your daughter’s marriage you planned on living with them. Didn’t you Mr. Swan? You knew you couldn’t keep living here. Someone would find out.”

“Are you suggesting that I attacked Mr. Winder? Look. There were plenty of people around who could have socked the guy.”

“You had motive and opportunity. You were working on the pulley when this happened.”

“Oh, c’mon detective. I’m just an old guy down on my luck trying to get by.”

“I had a conversation with another old guy down on his so-called luck. You see, I lead AA meetings at a church two blocks from here. One of the men at the meeting told the group that he messed up and went back to his old hangout – Blake’s tavern a couple of blocks from here. He had a few with some old friends. One old friend, he told the group, was pounding drinks and talking crazy, saying that sometimes you have to take matters into your own hands and eliminate the competition to improve your situation. The guy saying all this to the group is your bar mate Sam.”

“Sam?”

“I talked to Sam this morning, Charlie. He agreed to tell the judge what you said, nothing more and nothing less. And, I talked to my forensics tech. He said that there is only one set of fingerprints on the pulley. If their yours, well . . .”

“Alright. Alright. I . . .I just wanted to sideline the guy for a bit to give Mark a chance in the spotlight. I thought the curtain would cushion the impact. And I figured the guy had disability insurance to cushion his income.”

You had all this figured out, didn’t you Mr. Swan?”

“I figured I was helping my daughter.”

“By swinging a pulley into some guy’s mouth, busting his chops and taking the chair out from under his livelihood to leverage a better living situation for yourself? Does your daughter know that you . . . pulleyed this off?

“No. No. No. She doesn’t and I don’t want her to know.”

“Too late for that Mr. Swan. It’s curtains for you. Come with me down to the station. I’m booking you for aggravated assault on Mr. Winder. You can call your daughter to have her bail you out.”

  ~~~

After Mr. Swan was booked into custody, I went over to see Dutch and Diane.

Dutch’s mug looked like he’d been in a hockey fight. I told them that it was the custodian Mr. Swan who swung the pulley. No one else was involved. I told them Swan’s motive. They were both shocked by the account.

Then I told Dutch what the orchestra manager told me: they’re passing the hat around so you can buy a new trumpet and some new teeth. I give Dutch a box of Good and Plenty and he gives me a smile that hurt both of us. I tell them that I have to take off.

“There’s a blue-eyed blond waiting for me with a steak covered in onions and Farewell, My Lovely.”

~~

©J.A. Johnson, Kingdom Venturers, 2026, All Rights Reserved

No Country for Old Men Without Borders

“All the time you spend tryin to get back what’s been took from you there’s more goin out the door. After a while you just try and get a tourniquet on it.”
― Cormac McCarthy, No Country for Old Men

No Country for Old Men refers to a world that has become increasingly violent and chaotic, where traditional values and the moral compass of older generations are no longer effective or relevant. The title reflects the struggles of the aging sheriff, Ed Tom Bell, as he confronts the senseless violence and lawlessness that he feels ill-equipped to handle . . .

In the past six months I’ve come across two pastoral letters imploring Christians to think kindly toward the millions of foreign invaders who have illegally crossed our borders to appropriate our country’s resources and thereby impacting the future of our neighbors and the country.

The first (AI generated?) letter was posted “By A Country Pastor.” (Quaint, eh?) The second, from a Hispanic Anglican bishop out of California. (Surprise, surprise!). The document below is the latest missive. Like with my response to the first letter, I do not consider the current pastoral letter authoritative.

It’s not that an Anglican bishop doesn’t have authority to speak about such things. It’s just that there is nothing in the letter that compels me to change my understanding or my actions. I seek to love my neighbor as myself, I ascribe image-of-God dignity to all humans, and I hold myself and others accountable for what is done.

~~~

 Here’s the letter’s opening and my comments:

“As bishop of the Diocese of San Joaquin within the Anglican Church in North America, I write pastorally to address the subject of refugees and immigration. I recognize that immigration is a complex matter involving legal, social, and economic concerns. Yet for the Church, it is first and foremost a biblical and pastoral issue, shaped by our allegiance to Christ and our calling to make disciples of all nations (Philippians 3:20; Matthew 28:19–20).”

What brought about the need “to address the subject of refugees and immigration?”

Did narrative-edited videos on CNN and MS NOW showing ICE rounding up the bishop’s would-be disciples provoke clerical stole clutching? Was it something preachy Morning Joe Scarbourough said?

Was it some attribution of unchristian behavior onto the millions of legal citizens never wanting their neighborhoods and their country overrun with and terrorized by the worst of worst criminal aliens, international criminal gangs, drugs, and scammers?

Was it Progressivism’s predatory foray into the church? (See video below.)

“After years of global elites lecturing us about compassion, diversity, open borders, asylum, labor flows, and all the buzzwords they love to force-feed us, The Economist is suddenly admitting that voters are right to think the system has been gamed to screw us over.”

 The Economist suddenly changes its immigration tune…

Is it because “The globalist machine is sputtering and losing speed. And they can hear the America First engine coming up fast right behind them”?

Was it concern that Federal grant money to NGOs was drying up?

Was it Trump derangement syndrome?

Is it because Democrats need to keep their animus toward America, its Constitution and laws, always before us, so deportation resistance has to be revved up again?

What brought about the need “to address the subject of refugees and immigration?”

After giving lip service to the complex matters immigration invokes “involving legal, social, and economic concerns” – matters established by our country’s founders for the common good that include the principle of subsidiarity, protections both physical and civil, fiscal soundness, and a legitimate process for the integration and assimilation of legal immigrants leading to citizenship – the bishop, without saying any more about the very real down-to-earth “legal, social, and economic concerns” of not dealing with the complex matters that  (illegal) immigration brings down upon our families, our neighbors, our communities and our nation, goes on to place the matter of (illegal) immigration into his safe space – his otherworld jurisdiction.

The bishop, you see, has a “first and foremost” trump card: entitlement of citizenship for (illegal) immigrants – citizenship in heaven – that overrides legal citizenship status and subjugates the concerns of legal citizens to a ‘scriptural’ utility of making disciples.

I wonder. Does the bishop assume that illegal immigrants will want to assimilate and willingly accept being discipled because of compassion extended toward them? Do Islamists assimilate and become disciples of Jesus? Do gang members assimilate and become disciples of Jesus?  Will the Chinese from the CCP? Will the Somalians? If a comfortable living situation is the basis for entering illegally, the immigrant will be discipled by Democrats willing to give them all kinds comfortable living on welfare in exchange for their vote.

How convenient that the San Joaquin valley is inundated with Hispanic illegal immigrants! Now they can easily be colonized as citizens of heaven and as low-cost farm workers!

You tell me. Have you read anywhere in the gospels that before Jesus ascended into heaven, he said “Go. Open your borders. Let everyone in, even your enemies. This will facilitate making disciples.”?

The two letters are the same in their “pastoral” plea to be welcoming and hospitable to the invaders, the opportunists violating the law for access to another’s property and wealth. (See The Dark Side of the Immigration Debate and The Ungrateful Immigrant below.)

The letter goes on . . .

“Holy Scripture teaches that every human being is created in the image of God (Genesis 1:26). Therefore, all people—regardless of legal status, nationality, or ethnicity—possess inherent dignity. The Bible repeatedly calls God’s people to welcome the stranger, care for the vulnerable, and extend hospitality to those in need (Leviticus 19:33–34; Matthew 25:35; Hebrews 13:2). Our Lord Himself knew the life of a refugee when the Holy Family fled to Egypt (Matthew 2:13–23).”

Here, the bishop pulls out all the “social justice” stops. His words are coded in Biblical jargon to supply the naïve reader justification for open borders. We are to trade the real-world deleterious effects of illegal immigration for a high-minded other-world compassion that unleashes chaos with the senseless violence and lawlessness that we are ill-equipped to handle.

My understanding of image-of-God “inherent dignity” involves personal accountability and responsibility for one’s human agency. It’s not a badge we put on someone to give them a ‘social justice’ pass.

Tell me. When Jesus said “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy” (John 10:10) did he point out the inherent dignity of the thief so that we would take a compassionate view of him and his ways? Did he do this with the Pharisees or the woman caught in adultery? No. Jesus spoke of what they did against their image-of-God “inherent dignity.”

The application of “dignity,” like with applying “love,” can be used to Ok of all kinds of inordinate things, such as same-sex marriages: [IN Senator Todd} Young Op-Ed: Marriage Bill Ensures Dignity and Respect for All Hoosiers. S.J. James Martin uses “inherent dignity” to justify all kinds of unholy things

Both pastoral letters imply that foreign invaders should be treated as possessing human dignity. But do the illegal immigrants respect the inherent dignity of the ICE officers and their lawful task?

ICE has its hands full with those who resist – you know, the “strangers” who crossed the border illegally and are now putting up a fight with law enforcement. And with those “strangers” financed and deployed by Democrat NGOs to put up violent resistance. Where’s the dignity in that?

Why doesn’t the bishop publicly denounce and admonish the ICE protestors and the chaos they bring? His higher law says to speak the truth in love. Maybe he agrees with the NYT’s op-ed columnist David Brooks who says “It’s time for a comprehensive national civic uprising.”

“I’ll kill your whole f-cking family! Your whole f-cking family is dead!” the agitator yawped. “Your children, your wife—all dead!”

Acting AG Blanche: Anti-ICE Agitator Will Be Arrested for Threatening Agent During NJ Riot

At some point, ordinary, law-abiding people are going to get sick of the disorder protected and excused by their degenerate liberal governing elites. I will continue to ask the question “Where are the adults?”

Saying that Jesus was a refugee – is that said to invoke empathy for the refugee? How so? Mary, Joseph, and the baby traveled to Egypt under God’s protection and direction. They also remigrated home under God’s protection and direction. The Illegal immigrants can do the same.

The letter goes on . . .

“At the same time, Scripture affirms the legitimacy of nations and civil authority (Romans 13:1). A faithful Christian response must therefore hold together two truths: the responsibility of governments to uphold the rule of law and protect their borders, and the obligation to treat immigrants and refugees with justice, mercy, and compassion, in accordance with God’s law (Matthew 22:21).”

Let’s be clear. U.S. immigration laws are not unwelcoming or imposing hate. They are not anti-human anti-dignity. They, in fact, affirm human dignity by holding the people who placed themselves in the lawless positions accountable.

“Justice, mercy, and compassion” have been extended toward illegal immigrants and “refugees”:

USCIS Supports “Project Homecoming” Self-Deportation:

If you are here illegally and you want to go home, the Department of Homeland Security now offers use of the CBP Home Mobile App so that you can voluntarily self-deport. Through the CBP Home Mobile App, you receive a complimentary plane ticket home, receive a $2,600 exit bonus upon your return, and will have any unpaid fines for failing to timely depart forgiven.

But the opposite is portrayed by left-wing media. Such have a financial and political stake in promoting open borders. The opposite is also portrayed by church leadership that has accepted the media’s lies.

I agree. We are to treat all people with “justice, mercy, and compassion” in accordance with God’s will. That would include our neighbors who are having to deal with the invasion of millions of illegal aliens. There is nothing merciful, just or compassionate about an invasion of millions of foreigners into our communities.

The letter goes on . . .

“In my episcopal ordination vows, I pledged to be “gentle and merciful for Christ’s sake, to poor and needy people and to all strangers destitute of help” (BCP 2019, p. 504). Guided by that promise, I call the Church to bear faithful witness by loving our neighbors, advocating for the vulnerable, speaking the truth in love, and offering practical care to those entrusted to us (Luke 10:25–37; Matthew 5:13–16).

Who are the vulnerable? Children. Trafficked children. Exposed children.

“These children are vulnerable; they’re actually the ones who need the help,” Rivera said. “They’re brought against their will, and they have no say in where they’re going, whether it’s mom or dad, aunt or uncle, or some stranger getting something out of it.”

Border Crisis: CBP Fights Child Exploitation: Without a choice, thousands of children are forced to make a perilous journey

Open borders have been a gateway for the exploitation and oppression of human trafficking.

Open borders have been a gateway for the child trafficking.

Biden admin failed to probe more than 7,300 reports of migrant child trafficking, startling HHS findings show

Biden-Harris admin loses track of 320,000 migrant children — with untold numbers at risk of sex trafficking and forced labor

Open borders have been a gateway to make billions:

US Govt. Paid Catholic Charities $3 Billion to Traffic People across the US/Mexico Border – Public Intelligence Blog (phibetaiota.net)

Our children are now exposed to the flood of unvetted pedophiles entering the country during Biden’s (and the bishop’s watch). Arrested: Worst of the Worst

Our children are exposed to the flood of sickness entering the country during Biden’s (and the bishop’s) watch.

Open borders import disease.

New York City’s health commissioner announced last week that the influx of migrants from the southern border — more than 50,000 to New York City alone in the past year — is delivering contagious diseases, including tuberculosis and polio, to our neighborhoods.

Per the CDC: While still abroad, immigrants, refugees, and others who apply for admission to live permanently in the United States must undergo a medical examination.

Did this happen during the Biden open borders invasion? No.

Biden’s open borders are bringing contagious diseases to your neighborhood

The letter goes on . . .

“ Our Anglican tradition has long affirmed the Church’s responsibility to care for refugees and immigrants while engaging society with moral clarity and charity. Respect for civil law must always be informed and corrected by God’s higher law, which calls us to justice, dignity, and mercy.”

Again, I wonder what brought about this letter? Who is NOT engaging society with moral clarity and charity? Who is NOT “informed and corrected by God’s higher law, which calls us to justice, dignity, and mercy?” “Is it the “basket of deplorables”?

I view the deportation of the millions of foreign invaders as respect for civil law, as respect for my neighbors, as respect for “God’s higher law.”

I understand God’s higher law as that which holds people accountable with “justice, dignity, and mercy.”

The letter ends . . .

 “I encourage the faithful of this diocese to live into these convictions: welcoming the stranger, discipling those within our care, and assisting immigrants and refugees to live responsibly and faithfully within our communities. I pledge to engage our diocesan leadership and civil authorities with these biblical values, and I pray for the nations of Canada, Mexico, and the United States, that we may act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly with our God.

Signed,

 The Rt. Rev. Dr. Eric Vawter Menees, SSC”

If I see a stranger in my neighborhood, I say “Hi.” I try to connect.

I will continue to insist that all illegal “immigrants and refugees” be deported or remigrate home and then apply to come into the country legally.

Otherwise, our land becomes increasingly violent and chaotic, where traditional values and the moral compass of older generations are no longer effective or relevant. We will be confronted by senseless violence and lawlessness that we are ill-equipped to handle . . .

~~~

Some Thoughts

-During COVID there was a lot of Karen-like shaming going on. Not wearing a mask, not social distancing, and not vaxxing meant ridicule for not submitting to “We’re all in this together.” I get the same “get with the program” vibe from the two pastoral letters.

-There are those who think they know all about me even though they never write, call or visit. They “know” me from a distance, from what the media and church leaders present about people “like” me, as in CT’s Russel Moore (See below.) I get the same vibe from the two pastoral letters.

-That we should help the “vulnerable among us” sets up understanding illegal immigration in terms of the “oppressed” and the “oppressors.” Stay away from Marxist narratives.

-Out of context verses can be used to endorse all kinds of unscriptural church policies – from saying women should not be pastors/teachers to open borders to anything goes sexuality. Out of context, out of bounds.

-Much of what comes out of the church today about Jesus, comes from the TV. That is how some came to see Jesus as the docile, friendly, welcoming, and unwaveringly accepting Mr. Rogers. Being nice his emotional landscape and children’s. Do these same people think that ICE should take off their LE gear, put on a sweater, and say “Won’t you be my neighbor?” I will continue to ask the question “Where are the adults?”

-I once knew a female assistant rector. She saw herself as the PBS version of a female rector in an Anglican church in England – as the Vicar of Dibley. It came across in her PBS-like sermons.

-One cannot read the gospels and come away with Jesus being docile or unwaveringly accepting. Jesus didn’t accept whatever people did with their “inherent dignity” or “love.” He held people accountable. The gospel according to Progressivism doesn’t hold people accountable except for those who don’t go along with their narratives. See letter above.

Very reliable social media sources tell me that Jesus was a Progressive: he helped the vulnerable, the oppressed, and the foreigner. Why, they say that Jesus was down with socialism, abortion, LGBT-ism, social justice, DEI. Jesus was down with anything man came up with in the last five minutes to make the world a fairer and more equitable place, i.e. to make the world less God-saturated and more man-saturated.

Higher Law Bigotry

Two Judean religious leaders see a half-dead man lying on the side of the road as they walk along. A Judean had been beaten and robbed. But the two principled men stay away from “lesser” concerns to stay true to a higher law.

Someone the two religious leaders consider of low estate, as without their higher-law pedigree, comes along and helps their assaulted neighbor.

Turns out that the neighbor in Jesus’ parable is the one who sees what is going on around him and helps his neighbor. It is not the high-minded principled. And so it is with Christian leaders who ignore broken boundaries and their broken neighbors so as to observe a higher law.

~~~

https://www.dioceseofsanjoaquin.net/news–events

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt33324911

~~~

Victor Davis Hanson:

“I live on a farm beside a rural avenue in central California, the fifth generation to reside in the same house. And after years of thefts, home break-ins, and dangerous encounters, I have concluded that it is no longer safe to live where I was born. I stay because I am sixty-five years old and either too old to move or too worried about selling the final family parcel of what was homesteaded in the 1870s.”

The Diversity of Illegal Immigration

~~~

From my post Two Visions Three Questions:

What hard evidence do you have that an open borders policy is a good decision? Your feelings? Your empathy? Any talk about “welcoming the stranger” in the abstract is not hard evidence in support of an open borders policy. Is the evidence your need for cheap labor? Democrats Once Again Concerned About Who Will Pick Their Crops

And . . .

Lest anyone think that I am an “ignorant hillbilly” and can be known by my smell (Peter Strzok), lest anyone think that I am a rube and an uncaring Christian xenophobe nativist, and lest anyone think that I haven’t traveled outside my shire and am not cosmopolitan, know that I have traveled to many parts of the world and have met and worked with many different people during my 70+ years. I am not a misanthrope.

My travel, mostly for engineering work, included a trip to Seoul South Korea and within five miles of the DMZ, to Dhahran and Jubail Saudi Arabia and the oil fields worked by Saudi Aramco, to Warsaw and Bialystok Poland, to England during the Queen’s silver jubilee, to Rio De Janeiro, to Mexico  – Tuxpan and Tampico, Mexico City, and Sonora state, to many of the provinces of Canada, including Saskatchewan when it was 40 degrees below zero, and to most of the U.S.

I did love coming home to the U.S. after each trip to some distant place.

~~~

Podcasts:

“American Citizenship and Its Decline: Illegal Immigration and the Loss of National Sovereignty” from The Hillsdale College Online Courses Podcast by The Hillsdale College Online Courses Podcast.

Citizenship is rare in human history but essential to free government. Today, the constitutional rule of citizens in America is threatened by a new form of government, unaccountable to the people, in which power is held by a ruling class that seeks to transform our society. In this eight-lecture course, students will examine the origins and history of citizenship in the West and the grave challenges American citizenship faces today.

America’s founding principle of equality created an opportunity for people from all over the world—regardless of race or birth—to immigrate to the United States and become full citizens. This led to a system of immigration that proceeded according to established laws and required a willingness and ability to assimilate into American society. These criteria have been abandoned in favor of a system of widespread illegal immigration that erodes the rights of citizens. (Emphasis mine.)

American Citizenship and Its Decline: Illegal Immigration and the Loss of National Sovereignty

https://podcast.hillsdale.edu/american-citizenship-and-its-decline-illegal-immigration-and-the-loss-of-national-sovereignty

https://podcast.hillsdale.edu/american-citizenship-and-its-decline-introduction

~~

Influence Campaigns Inside Evangelical Institutions Podcast:

https://cis.org/Parsing-Immigration-Policy/Influence-Campaigns-Inside-Evangelical-Institutions

~~~

Eric Metaxas: Christianity Today Had an Easter Message: We’re Just … Better Than You

“Lord, I Thank Thee That I Am Not Like These Deplorables”

[CT’s Russel] Moore quotes the evangelical sociologist James Davison Hunter, who in a previous patronizing essay made the case that it is the begrudging resentment of groups who once had power that fuels our societal woes. Hunter doesn’t actually say “working-class white Christians” so much as dog-whistle it. Everything such knuckle-dragging relics do is actually only so that they might cling to what power they still have — or mebbe to yank it back from them’s what took it. . .

Cheap Amateur Psychoanalysis

Moore explains, for example, the real reason that some people want secure borders:

“In Hunter’s view, a ressentiment posture is heightened when the group holds a sense of entitlement — to greater respect, to greater power, to a place of majority status. This posture, he warned, is a political psychology that expresses itself with “’the condemnation and denigration of enemies in the effort to subjugate and dominate those who are culpable.’”

Here Moore might very well die in the irony mines, as he condemns and denigrates his own cultural enemies for … condemning and denigrating their cultural enemies. Because the rules are apparently different for the right sort of people. . .

Damn the Kulaks, Full Speed Ahead!

But buckle thy seatbelts, pilgrims, for the condescension will soar yet higher. Moore continues:

“Often, the most contentious aspects of American life center on the question ‘Who is trying to take America away from us?’— whether that be immigrant caravans overwhelming the border, the concept of American elites developing a global pandemic to control the population with vaccines, or the rhetoric of Satan-worshiping pedophile rings at the highest levels of government.”

Moore confidently assures that his critics are driven by sheer resentment — pardon me, ressentiment — and are clinging to some America in which they were top-dogs. But the positively Himalayan irony is that it is Moore and his friends in subsidized, institutional Christianity who are losing cultural power. So they’re lashing out, in essays such as this.

~~~

Christian leaders shouldn’t be more concerned about protecting illegal aliens from ICE than protecting the religious freedom of their congregants.

https://thefederalist.com/2026/01/20/if-your-pastor-values-illegal-immigration-more-than-your-right-to-worship-find-a-new-church

~~~

Here’s what the media does to people: James Woods: On Memorial Day, a veteran dies from being beaten to death for the way he voted – in America… – Revolver News

Where are the pastoral statements about this murder? None I suspect. This is a lesser concern and not the business of following the “higher law.”

~~~

We are to be the Welcome Mat:

Texas state representative James Talarico compared the nation’s southern border to a “front porch,” saying it should function like a “giant welcome mat.”

~~~

J.B. Shurk, writing at American Thinker:

Globalism Seeks to Kill the Nation-State: International government threatens the whole planet.

People are beginning to understand that those who rule in their name have long been working to eliminate the nation-state…. 

 . . .That’s another part of internationalism’s linguistic magic trick: The same global corporate news machine that has spent the last eighty-plus years conditioning people to understand the word “nationalism” as something evil, militant, and barbaric has simultaneously conditioned the world to see anything “international” as inherently good, peaceful, and progressive.  The “national / international” dichotomy didn’t happen by accident; it’s been shoved down our throats all our lives.  But once again, if a rational person takes a moment to consider the semantic manipulation, it is quite absurd.  

 . . . internationalism’s true intent: Internationalists are building a global empire.  This empire is authoritarian (because it demands global compliance at the expense of personal freedom) and totalitarian (because it requires complete subservience to a centralized and dictatorial global government).  There is nothing “democratic” or “representative” about this international system of governance.  It has no interest in protecting an individual’s rights and freedoms.  It has no interest in respecting a nation’s sovereignty.  It will permit both individuals and nations to be raped in the name of “global peace.”

Therefore, it makes perfect sense why the United Nations encourages mass illegal immigration into the United States and Europe.  When you are in the business of destroying nations, you do not care if murderers and rapists destroy local families.  You do not care if Islamic terrorists burn down Christian churches.  You do not care if the “newcomers” to Europe and America have pledged to conquer the West. (Emphasis mine.)

~~~

E. Jeffrey Ludwig, writing at American Thinker:

Illegal Is Legal, Immoral Is Moral – American Thinker

[American society is] also are contending with millions of foreign nationals who were admitted illegally during President Joe Biden’s administration, whom Democrats defend against being rounded up and deported.  This expulsion of illegals is an affirmation of our legal system, which has set up rules for legal entry into the USA.  The rules were approved by our legislative system, but now and for the four years of the previous administration, those laws are being denied and repudiated by one of our two major parties.  The Democrats are doing what they can to defund the offices of government responsible for rounding up those illegals.  They are encouraging illegal behavior yet do not believe that a stigma is attached to that intention.

They are sentimentalizing immigration laws as though our already generous laws were overly strict and against the pro-immigration traditions of the USA.  Illegal entry by “huddled masses yearning to breathe free” is being propagandized as being more “moral” than obedience to the legitimately passed laws. (Emphasis mine.)

Suicidal Empathy is Killing the West

In the new book Suicidal Empathy, evolutionary behavioral scientist and professor Gad Saad makes the case that the West’s most celebrated virtue has been weaponized, mis calibrated, and taken to a place that is actively destroying the societies it claims to protect.

“ . . .  the “West’s elitist progressive political class is infected by a mind parasite that causes its empathy module to misfire in every conceivable manner. Many of the policy decisions that are wreaking havoc in the West stem from this poor calibration of empathy, resulting in a society that is galloping toward the abyss of infinite lunacy.”

The Road To Hell Is Being Paved With Suicidal Empathy

~~~

This Is NOT what Jesus would do:

New York City shouldn’t be flooded with filthy water, garbage, or aggressive illegal foreigners.

“When you first watch the video, you’d think this was some filthy, chaotic scene from Bangladesh.

“But sadly, this isn’t Bangladesh.

“It’s Canal Street in New York City.

“Yep, the Big Apple looks downright rotten, folks. And the kicker is that this is basically a no-go zone for Americans.

“And before the “refugee welcome” crowd starts screaming about how America was a nation shaped by immigrants. We know about the olden days. But the Ellis Island era worked because there was an expectation of assimilation. People came here, brought parts of their culture with them, and still understood they were joining something that already existed.

“That’s not what this clip looks like.

This looks like a city that has stopped enforcing any American standards whatsoever. It looks like an illegal street economy operating out in the open, and it also looks like counterfeit goods, sidewalk chaos, territorial vendor control, illegals, foreigners, and Americans citizens being chased away from streets in their own country.” (Emphasis mine.)

Look at this horrific street in a popular US city. American citizens aren’t welcome… – Revolver News

~~~

The wolves – Globalism and Progressivism – have snuck into the church dressed in sheep’s clothing.

When Progressivism snuck into the Anglican church I was attending in Illinois via a female Wheaton college professor who became an assistant rector, I left. I knew the woke virus was already overtaking the congregation.

Progressive Christians believe “God is bigger than our borders, bigger than our language, bigger than our certainty.”

Megan Basham: How Progressivism Creeped into Evangelical Churches

Megan Basham: When Progressive Foundations Fund Evangelism

The political projects men like Christianity Today editor Russell Moore and New York Times columnist David French undertake involve a contradiction. While lamenting how partisan American Christianity has become (frequentlyaccusing other evangelicals of shilling for “Christian Nationalism”), they continue to launch and participate in programs designed, albeit covertly, to inject progressive politics into the church. (Emphasis mine.)

Progressive Powerbrokers & Corruption in the American Church | with Megan Basham

How Naivety Is Allowing Unbiblical Progressivism Into Evangelical Churches

~~~

Left to Our Own Devices?

“You will own nothing and you will be happy.”

This published World Economic Forum slogan, derived from a reposted blog essay by a Danish politician titled “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better,” embodies a vision of doing away with the ownership of private property and autonomy in favor of a shared and planned economy overseen by the “providence” of WEF elites.

The proposed systems or platforms would provide technological access to needed resources, thereby providing gratification – so says the Dane. What is not said: in order to produce a hyper-egalitarian world, such comprehensive oversight of humans would require the beating down, leveling, debasing, and tyrannizing of the humans into thinking and accepting what is doled out in terms of what is valued per the elites.

“Have we discovered some new reason why, this time, power should not corrupt as it has done before?” – C.S. Lewis, from the third essay in The Abolition of Man.

The overlords of the modern bureaucratic state (presumptuously) use rational control to solve all problems with (smug) amoral certainty. Rational control?

R.J. Snell writing for Acton Institute regarding Harvey C. Mansfield’s recent book The Rise and Fall of Rational Control: The History of Modern Political Philosophy:

According to Mansfield, modernity is intrinsically linked to Machiavelli. . .

Rational control depended on ending irrational control, meaning custom, which includes social mores, institutions, and “God or the gods.” Rational control requires our liberation from the divine; humanity itself serves as a principle of order, asserting “human rights as against divine rights.” Moral custom can survive the taming of the gods, however, so morality must also be placed on a rational basis. For Machiavelli, princes must learn “how to be not good.” Ancient philosophers constructed utopian principles, but moderns take guidance from the “effectual truth” of action. The ruthless doing of “the necessary” establishes and preserves the city.

Who is Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 -1527)? See below.

The WEF’s Brave New World kind of slogan, with its enchantment of fulfillment via a Soma-like numbing- homogenizing process that divests the individual of all worldly (and otherworldly) concerns, I read as “rational control” ending “irrational control.” The ownership of inherited values and identity from the older cosmic order that included the transcendent Overworld is to be exchanged for the management of affairs by the realpolitik of “princes.” Their new modes and orders will displace what came before, replace the “ought” with the “is,” and effect the ruthless doing of “the necessary” via devices with avatars, apps and AI.

(Our world has many glory seeking manipulative “princes.” They rule their principalities in the WEF, the EU, and the UN. They rule in city, state, and federal government. They are the tech bros pushing AI and data centers down our throats.)

“You will own nothing and you will be happy”represents the presumed gratifying effects of rational control giving materialism and science unquestioned authority over our lives to produce “effectual truth” outcomes. Subjects of the slogan are to sell their souls to the “princes” of this world to make way for “man’s freedom … to answer his own needs with his own arms.”

Those enchanted by a managed existence absent of meaning and free will, such as the Danish politician, are apparently OK with a world that is increasingly disconnected from “the past, people, place, and prayer” and increasingly connected to “science, self, sex, and screens” (Paul Kingsnorth, Against the Machine).

Chuck Chalberg, writing for the Imaginative Conservative:

Kingsnorth might not have needed to define each of his S’s, but he does: Science gives us a “non-mythic” story of our origins; “the highest good is to serve the self”; sex is an “affirmation of individual identity”; and the screen is “both our main source of distraction from reality and the interface by which we are directed into the coming post-human reality of the machine.”

I view such world as cold and indifferent, in a calculating, utilitarian, mechanistic, ad-addled, app-addled, drug-addled, increasingly violent, and wretched way.

Those enchanted by a dystopian existence are apparently OK with living in a pathological environment, one that has “almost no qualities of a sane, wise, productive, creative environment that we would wish for ourselves” (Iain McGilchrist).

“You will own nothing and you will be happy” is scientific reductionism’s disenchantment of the world.

Henri Bortoft writes at The Nature Institute about the 18th to 19th century German polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe’s way of perceiving:

Goethe [sought a method that, in his words] “did not treat of nature as divided and in pieces, but presented her as working and alive, striving out of the whole into the parts.” The first thing we notice here is the reversal of perception: not from the part to the whole, but from the whole into the parts. Goethe was someone who could see the wholeness in nature directly, and, furthermore, had specific practices that could lead to the ability to do so.

C. S. Lewis, in English Literature in the Sixteenth Century (1954), wrote that no longer is the universe thought of as an orchestra “tingling with anthropomorphic life, dancing, ceremonial, a festival.” Now it is thought of in terms of a machine. In terms of language, Lewis’ understood that

“Pre-modern metaphors were animated; the cosmos seemed saturated with presence, soul, and being. In contrast, modern man prefers inorganic metaphors borrowed from the steady, unwavering move­ment of machines.” (Jason Baxter, “Evil Enchantment” versus Platonic Vision: Dante, Lewis, and the Weight of Glory) (The After Dinner Scholar podcast).

Many have witnessed and written about the ongoing deconstruction of our inherited perception of the cosmos.

Below, two poets, a professor of Medieval and Renaissance Literature, a modern playwright and a psychiatrist/neuroscientist account the withdrawing from the ages-old animating symphonic signal (objective values of truth, beauty, and goodness) toward modern machine noise (amoral realpolitik’s ruthless doing of “the necessary”):

“Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar”

In 1867, Matthew Arnold wrote a poem about the decline of religious belief in mid-nineteenth-century Britain. Dover Beach speaks of a sea change during the Victorian era: the rising tide of scientific discovery and the withdrawing “sea of faith.” He saw Christian faith increasingly challenged by the influences of materialism and scientific discoveries.

Dover Beach portrays the effect with words describing loss and alienation from what had been so encompassing:

The Sea of Faith
Was once, too, at the full, and round earth’s shore
Lay like the folds of a bright girdle furled.
But now I only hear
Its melancholy, long, withdrawing roar,
Retreating, to the breath
Of the night-wind, down the vast edges drear
And naked shingles of the world.

“A heap of broken images”

T. S. Eliot’s 1922 poem The Waste Land, written in the wake of WWI, describes the barrenness and alienation of modern life. With a collage of cultural allusions, Eliot portrays modern society as shallow, the rich spiritual and cultural landscape of the past reduced to rubble. Society, he writes, is dealing with “A heap of broken images.”

What are the roots that clutch, what branches grow
Out of this stony rubbish? Son of man,
You cannot say, or guess, for you know only
A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water.

“a bad spell, an evil enchantment”

Jason M. Baxter, in his essay “Evil Enchantment” versus Platonic Vision: Dante, Lewis, and the Weight of Glory,” writes of professor C.S. Lewis’ take on the negation of goodness referencing a compilation of Lewis’ sermons tiled Transposition (1944) and his book The Abolition of Man (1943):

“The oxford don consistently used the metaphor of a bad spell, arguing that modernity had cast an “evil enchantment of worldliness” that makes the weight of goodness fell less substantial. In fact, Lewis argued that there was a kind of historical chasm or gaping cultural canyon that separated modernity from anything that came before: what he called the “Great Divide.”  . . . This is, in part, because our image of the cosmos and our understanding of its op­erations are radically different from that of the pre-modern world. Our metaphors have changed: “The fundamental concept of modern science is, or was until very recently, that of natural ‘laws.’. . . In medieval science the fundamental concept was that of certain sympathies, antipathies, and strivings inherent in matter itself.” Modern man speaks about how a fall­ing rock obeys a law of nature; medieval man spoke of the rock as desiring or longing to return to its natural place, like a pigeon returning to its nest by a homing instinct. Pre-modern metaphors were animated; the cosmos seemed saturated with presence, soul, and being. In contrast, modern man prefers inorganic metaphors borrowed from the steady, unwavering move­ment of machines. (My emphasis.)

. . .

“When the animate picture of the cosmos and the organic metaphors used to describe it passed away, two other changes followed. The first is that we began to imagine the sources of deep meaning were located within, not without. As Charles Taylor has put it, we “conceive of ourselves as having inner depths. We might even say that the depths which were previously located in the cosmos, the enchanted world, are now more readily placed within.” Lewis wrote about this displacement of meaning in his impas­sioned critique of modern education, The Abolition of Man.”

(You can read Baxter’s complete essay w/footnotes in my post “Self-Central Casting.” The article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University)

The Abolition of Man was published in 1943. Three lectures by C.S. Lewis form the book: Men Without Chests, The Way, and The Abolition of Man.

In identifying the pathologies of the age, Lewis warned about the consequences of doing away with ideas of objective value and natural law. Moral relativism, he claimed, would-result in the Abolition of Man and Men Without Chests. He defended the existence of a moral consensus among mankind that transcends cultures, polities, and historical epochs. 

Lewis sought to reenchant the world with his fiction: The Space trilogy, Till We have Faces, The Chronicles of Narnia and other works.

In a 1946 essay “Talking about Bicycles” Lewis wrote about how understanding changes in terms of “four ages about nearly everything.” He gave them names: the unenchanted age, the enchanted age, the disenchanted age, and the reenchanted age.

We are in a disenchanted age.

Where do values come from?

British playwright and screenwriter Tom Stoppard (1937-2025) was known for plays that are both comedic and philosophical.

This is true of one of his most famous plays, the 1966 absurdist tragicomedy Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead. Two minor characters from Shakespeare’s Hamlet become main figures in a play ‘outside’ the narrative of Shakespeare’s Hamlet (which has a play within a play).

From the play’s synopsis at Stage Agent:

Part Shakespearean tragedy, part Laurel and Hardy comedy routine, part Waiting for Godot absurdity, Tom Stoppard’s masterful debut play calls fate, free will, art, reality, communication, and the very constructs of theatre into question, all the while leading two most honorable, adventurous, brilliant, and inept characters on their path to their unfortunate, unavoidable, infamous fate.

His 1972 play Jumpers “intertwines high-minded discussion with broad comic absurdity.” Stoppard “explores and satirizes the field of academic philosophy by likening it to a less-than-skillful competitive gymnastics display.” It is set in a university “where philosophy has become a battleground rather than a search for truth.” It is a bewildering world of pragmatists and relativists where logic has confounded belief in moral absolutes. The play raises questions of “What do we know?” and “Where do values come from?”

Stoppard’s 2015 play The Hard Problem again deals the ultimate source of objective goodness and value.

Lauren Halvorsen, at Studio Theater:

In constructing Hilary, Stoppard explains, “I wanted to write a character who is good—not goody-goody—and believes that goodness has an objective reality which is not captured by, explained by, or defined by evolutionary science, by evolutionary psychology, by evolutionary biology, by neo-Darwinism.” Hilary’s faith is ridiculed by her colleagues—but they can’t fully refute her stances. Stoppard investigates the interplay of faith and fact, irrationality with would-be rational behavior. How would neuroscientists definitively prove that every instinct is chemical, explicable, and geared for survival? And what happens to our beliefs when science can’t hold all the answers? Can some ideas only be understood through an unquantifiable intuition?

In a world driven by empirical data, Hilary is a controversial figure—she argues passionately in favor of free will, defends altruism as more than self-interest, and believes in God, much to the consternation of her materialist fellow scientist and occasional lover Spike. And it gradually emerges that Hilary’s stances are informed, in part, by personal reasons: at age 15, she had a baby and made an adoption plan, and now prays for her daughter as she wonders what became of her.

We are living in a pathological environment

Iain McGilchrist – psychiatrist, philosopher and neuroscientist:

“There is no question. We are living in a pathological environment. It has almost no qualities of a sane, wise, productive, creative environment that we would wish for ourselves. It has very few of those qualities that characteristically lead to those qualities. It maximizes conflict. It incubates extreme points of view. It robs us of embodied and embedded wisdom that comes from the culture and proximity to the natural world.

All these things that used to be taken for granted are now robbed of us and it’s no surprise that responses are massive existential anxiety, depression, suicidal thinking, a sense of hopelessness, complete loss of meaning. . . it is a complete tragedy because it doesn’t have to be like that. We need to break out of the prison we have made for ourselves.”

The above excerpt from the May 2026 video & podcast – Civilization’s Imbalance and Restoring the Humanities: The Divided Brain

https://www.unsiloedpodcast.com/episodes/iain-mcgilchrist

Iain McGilchrist discusses how the brain works, how left and right hemispheres attend to things – thereby making a difference on how we respond to the world.

Ultimate Meaning with objective standards for goodness and value is being explained away by neuroscience reductionist claims that meaning comes down to brain chemistry and atoms. If there is meaning, it is described in terms of an inexorable evolutionary process at work to pass on our genes in the best way possible. (See Is God the answer to our Meaning Crisis? Video below.)

Are we to view life through scientific reductionism’s microscope?

Are we to be viewed life through scientific reductionism’s microscope?

Should we be logical positivists and base all knowledge on perceptual experience and consider metaphysical and subjective arguments not based on observable data as meaningless?

Should we live accepting that there is nothing but matter and disregard intuition or revelation for “the science?”

Is life to be understood using only the science text book of humans (which scientism perverts for “effectual truth” outcomes) and not the gestalt of human consciousness as found in poetry (that provides meaning)?

Admittedly, there is a lot to ponder here.

As I have written before, I am an autodidact. I have no degree. I read and study that which interests and concerns me. Then, I put it down in words. The above is not some term paper to be graded. The above is what I have come to understand: what I was looking for since my earliest days, since The Day the Music Died.

It wasn’t until I reached my 70s that I understood the loss of connection to true mythos and the orchestra “tingling with anthropomorphic life, dancing, ceremonial, a festival.”

~~~

Who is Niccolo Machiavelli (1469 -1527)?

Here’s a brief Yale lecture (video, podcast & transcript) about the Florentine, the founder of the modern state, and his book, “The Prince”: Lecture 10 – New Modes and Orders: Machiavelli, The Prince (chaps. 1-12)

“Machiavelli announces his break, indeed his repudiation of all those who have come before, all those who have come before. He both replaces and yet reconfigures according to his own lights, elements from both the Christian empire and the Roman republic, to create a new form of political organization distinctly his own.” (This description of Machiavelli could be describing today’s Progressive politicians and many church organizations!)

(This being Memorial Day weekend, I doubt that the “princes” of this world will honor the fallen. They’ll be busy barbecuing and planning their next doing of “the necessary.”

~~~

The modern state increasingly treats culture not as an independent civilizational inheritance deserving protection but as raw material to be supervised, corrected, and ideologically aligned. The old pastoral ideal of the fulfilled and self-reliant individual citizen gradually gives way to the therapeutic subject: managed, supervised, controlled, yet perpetually assured of her freedom in “our democracy.”

A civilization survives only when there remain spheres of life politics cannot wholly absorb. Once politics becomes everything, civilization itself begins to disappear.

The Politicization Of Everything | ZeroHedge

Authored by David Solway via The Epoch Times,

Don’t become a Green grocer.

~~~

Elizabeth Oldfield & James Marriott: Is God the answer to our Meaning Crisis? | Uncommon Ground

Elizabeth Oldfield, host of the Sacred Podcast, and James Marriott, literary critic and Times columnist, join Justin on Uncommon Ground to discuss whether we can find meaning in life without God.
Elizabeth tells of her own search for meaning in Christian faith, while James explains why, as an atheist nihilist, he still loves art and literature. They discuss the search for purpose, and signs of a new interest in faith among young people.

Elizabeth Oldfield & James Marriott: Is God the answer to our Meaning Crisis? | Uncommon Ground

For Elizabeth Oldfield: https://www.elizabetholdfield.com/
For James Marriott: https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/full-fat-faith-the-young-christian-converts-filling-our-churches-x69pd289k?

~~~

And the Beat Down Goes On

“. . . the terror of the night
    or the arrow that flies by day
or the pestilence that stalks in darkness
    or the destruction that wastes at noonday.”
Psalm 91

Fires, floods and extreme weather will imperil a third of all life on land in the next 60 years.

Nobel Physicist Predicts END DATE For Modern Civilization: And it’s quite soon…

The New York Times’s Resident Catastrophist Delivers Another Subscription to the End of the World

You wake up in a news cycle that never sleeps. With a cup of coffee, you read what ‘doomcasters’ are saying about end-of-life scenarios appearing on the horizon. Now you are fully awake and wondering what to do with these high alert headlines? Do you let existential crisis into your life?

You sip your coffee and remember that not long ago the world was subjected to pandemic hysteria. Coronavirus, the “global crisis of unprecedented reach and proportion,” started making headlines at the beginning of 2020.

You recall the WHO declaring the coronavirus a “public health emergency of international concern.” And the headlines declaring surges in COVID-19 cases attributed to the Omicron variant, a “tripledemic” – COVID combined with flu and RSV, and of overwhelmed hospitals and healthcare systems and dancing nurses.

How could you forget that Biden imposed OSHA vaccination and testing emergency standards on your business or the reality-warping restrictive policies involving mandated lockdowns, masking, social distancing, fines, and vaccines, or the CDC predicting people will die?

You pour yourself another cup of coffee and look out the kitchen window. You see the couple next store – Vivian and Zoe – walking their dog Baxter. The other day, when you took the garbage can to the curb, the apoplectic twosome accosted you with “Democracy is threatened by the likes of you extremists, fascists, racists, homophobe Christian nationalists!” and “Trump is Hitler!” They saw you going to church last Sunday.

You drink your coffee troubled that Viv and Zoe had been beaten down by another media existential crisis campaign, akin to the rollout of the COVID-19 marketing campaign that told us to worry about it, and how to worry about it.

Under the spell of the “Democracy is threatened” campaign, Viv and Zoe were in a state of emotional panic. And that had them beat down on the closest person who didn’t share their views or the views of the commercial-sponsored media. The media’s inordinate influence has you very concerned about the collective fear and confusion its campaigns were causing to psyches.

The beat down goes on . . . in our heads.

~~~

How shall we then live in the context of existential dread?

Day after day imagination is battered with dire predictions– the end of this and that unless we do this and that. The steady beat of amplified headlines overwhelms one’s patience, strength, and soul.

Climate change, pandemics, wars, “Democracy!” AI Could Make Humans Irrelevant!

How do we respond to headlines telling us that we are done for? Should we let fear and helplessness dominate our lives? Can we live in terms of “accepting disharmony from the outset and defying it”? This last way of going forward is the directive C.S. Lewis prescribes in his essay “On Living in an Atomic Age.”

Published in post-war 1948 and at the beginning of the atomic age, the essay provides a reality-check perspective and presents a scenario of how to live in life-ending times.

The following is an excerpt from the opening of Lewis’ short essay. During COVID the excerpt was passed around on the internet, with “atomic” replaced with “coronavirus.” Certainly, the essay can be applied to any dire life-threatening circumstances.

In one way we think a great deal too much of the atomic bomb. “How are we to live in an atomic age?” I am tempted to reply: “Why, as you would have lived in the sixteenth century when the plague visited London almost every year, or as you would have lived in a Viking age when raiders from Scandinavia might land and cut your throat any night; or indeed, as you are already living in an age of cancer, an age of syphilis, an age of paralysis, an age of air raids, an age of railway accidents, an age of motor accidents.”

 In other words, do not let us begin by exaggerating the novelty of our situation. Believe me, dear sir or madam, you and all whom you love were already sentenced to death before the atomic bomb was invented: and quite a high percentage of us were going to die in unpleasant ways. We had, indeed, one very great advantage over our ancestors — anesthetics; but we have that still. It is perfectly ridiculous to go about whimpering and drawing long faces because the scientists have added one more chance of painful and premature death to a world which already bristled with such chances and in which death itself was not a chance at all, but a certainty.

This is the first point to be made: and the first action to be taken is to pull ourselves together. If we are all going to be destroyed by an atomic bomb, let that bomb when it comes find us doing sensible and human things praying, working, teaching, reading, listening to music, bathing the children, playing tennis, chatting to our friends over a pint and a game of darts—not huddled together like frightened sheep and thinking about bombs. They may break our bodies (a microbe can do that) but they need not dominate our minds.

The full essay, in the document below, contains questions and positions Lewis maintains, such as

Are we “accepting disharmony from the outset and defying it?”

Do we “hold up our own human standards against the idiocy of the universe?”

Are we the product of blind physical forces and therefore unable to provide answers to questions of a fatalist existence?

“But suppose we really are spirits? Suppose we are not the offspring of Nature…?”

“We must go back to a much earlier view.”

“We must simply accept it that we are spirits, free and rational beings, at present inhabiting an irrational universe, and must draw the conclusion that we are not derived from it.”

“If there is no straight line elsewhere, how did we discover that Nature’s line is crooked?”

“Nothing is more likely to destroy a species or a nation than a determination to survive at all costs.”

https://www.matthewaglaser.com/living-in-an-atomic-age

“On Living in an Atomic Age” (first published 1948) by C. S. Lewis (1898–1963) From: Present Concerns: Essays by C.S. Lewis (edited by Walter Hooper; New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1986), pages 73–80

Born a few years after the above essay was published, I became well aware of ‘doomcasting’ headlines. I recalled some of the headlines in my January 2025 post Surface Readings.

The post began with the words of poet W H Auden – “Now is the age of anxiety” and my own take on things: “Impending doom has been in the news during my entire lifetime.” I wrote about the headlines and pronouncements of those anxious times which included the book The Late great Planet Earth based on the modern and heretical notion of dispensationalism.

~~~

Imagination Reset

Taking in the spirit of the times, imaginations are exposed to the negation of life and dire predictions often made for political ends that use fear to move power into the hands of the few.

Taking in the digital tabloid times is the “WHAAM!” of a Roy Lichtenstein Ben-Day dots painting. Imagination is amped up and ready to pop with a Pow!

What happens to our imaginations when we are constantly confronted with crisis? And, how do we live with dire predictions?

With the 24/7/365 news cycle, it’s little wonder that “News Avoidance” is becoming a common way to deal with the constant specter of troubling things, as Thaddeus G. McCotter writes in I Didn’t Read the News Today, Oh Boy: Embracing the ‘News Avoidance’ Pandemic

“If you live today, you breath in nihilism … it’s the gas you breathe. If I hadn’t had the Church to fight it with or to tell me the necessity of fighting it, I would be the stinkingest logical positivist you ever saw right now.” ― Flannery O’Connor

What we shouldn’t avoid are resources such as poetry, art, classical literature and music to help us cope with and see beyond the terrors of the modern age. We need the signal of those who came before and dealt with all kinds of things and not the clamoring noise of influencers.

Poet Wallace Stevens, in “The Noble Rider and the Sound of Words” writes that poetry, as it interacts with reality and the imagination, can shape our perspective and provide meaning and comfort in a world that often feels overwhelming and harsh.

Wallace emphasizes the role of imagination in countering the beat down of life. If you are a Christian, you already know that the poetry of the Psalms does just that, e.g., Psalm 91.

In the video below, Dr. Jason Baxter, author of The Medieval Mind of C.S. Lewis discusses his book, Why Literature Still Matters.

Why Literature Still Matters: An Interview with Dr. Jason Baxter | Classical Home Education

~~~

If you need a quick antidote to climate hysteria, Itxu Díaz provides his take on the news of impending doom: Climate Change Scientists Set a Date for the Arrival of Hell on Earth: the Year 2085.

~~~

Naomi Wolf with Outspoke: “I’m here tonight to talk about a huge news story that broke in the last couple of days. It could be thread that unravels the whole COVID virus/vaccine perpetrator issue.

“A criminal syndicate, essentially.

“Even just this initial gesture is so transformational. It breaks the spell of, “No one can be held accountable, no one can be investigated from the untouchable third rail COVID vaccine rollout, COVID virus rollout.””

“The Shocking Story of NIH Secretly Funding COVID”

~~~

And the Beat Down Goes On

~~~

Wreathing (Matthew 6:34)

On my shed door, atop its plastic wreath,

a robin fashioned a nest, found twigs the binding.

then, behold,

above the manufactured certainty,

within the steadfastly twig-tucked wreathing,

her brood burst burst burst forth.

J.A. Johnson, 2026