The Binary That Binds?

I kid you not… 

Gender inclusive ‘school district says drop ‘boys and girls,’call kids’purple penguins’

 In its quest for “welcomeness” the Lincoln, Nebraska school system, under the guidance of individuals with superior ‘intellect’ and with visions of sugar plum equality fairies dancing in their heads have told their teaching staff to not use the appellation “Boy” or “Girl “ when referring to boys and girls. Instead “purple penguin” is to be considered an appropriate designation for your son or daughter. They kid you not.

 This humanistic-nihilistic-equality worshiping social engineering didn’t start here, in Lincoln Nebraska. It began years ago in the hearts and minds of those who abandoned natural law and the God who structured it.

 These wizards conjured philosophies, via God-abhorring human-craft, that were to magically create a more perfect world via perfected institutions, institutions that would lift mankind (Now, penguin-kind) from its savagery to its wunderkind apotheosis.

 Consider the words from the 1700s of French Enlightenment thinker Marie Jean Antoine Nicholas Caritat, marquis de Cordocet written in his “Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind.” Per Condorcet, “a real equality” demands that “even the natural differences between men will be mitigated by social policy.”

 The Condorcet webpage reminds us that what humanists seek is nothing short of god-like omniscience and sovereignty:

 “Our hopes for the future condition of the human race can be subsumed under three important heads:

The abolition of inequality between nations,

The progress of equality within each nation,

The true perfection of mankind.”

 

I do not think for a minute that what Condorcet wrote long ago implied that our identities should be wiped clean and that “purple penguin” be written on our name tag. But, once the pathogen of humanism is left to mutate within isolated ivory tower minds we end up with the dementia found in Lincoln, Nebraska.

 The Lincoln, Nebraska school system has taken humanist thinking and extrapolated it to the extreme. The Lincoln, Nebraska school system is playing god with the lives of our little ones and they are doing so to facilitate “gender inclusiveness”-titillating words that send chills down the legs of people with frozen brains.

 Of course, the gods of political correctness (the coercive inclusive-for-few-ejective-of-all-others LGBT mob) must be satisfied. Anything and everything that is natural-the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God-including marriage and, now, your child’s human identity is to be sacrificed by Hegelian Progressives on the altar of identity politics. Child sacrifice has returned. Yin and yang are bad. Synthesis and Kumbaya are good little penguins.

 From the ‘gender inclusive’ Lincoln, Nebraska school system’s dehumanization of children we are to understand that binary is bad: 0 and 1, 1 and 0 are out.

 Binary gender does not reflect, we are told by effete ‘educators,’ the true nature of an all important aspect of education: ‘gender fluidity.’

 ‘Gender fluidity,’ is now to be considered a necessary Common Core-ish foundation for a good public education. And, like Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, these school administrators have no use for the U.S. Constitution. It is too natural law abiding, too structured, too not with it!

 But wait! Even more important than the dismantling of young minds and rebuilding them with the sands of ‘gender fluidity’ is that life will become ever more ‘perfect’ for that loveable LGBT crowd.

 The imposition of “Gender Identity Fluidity’ teaching, a narcissistic precondition for a teeny tiny minority, is now going to open the flood gates of raw sewage that will pour right into our child’s classroom.

 Calling children “purple penguins” negates the binary and we are left with nil. Welcome to Disneyland humanism and hell on earth.

 

 

 Wisdom is known by her children, a tree by its fruit.

 

 

BTW: here is the Lincoln, Nebraska handout in PDF format:

 

12 easy steps on the way to gender inclusivenessGender-inclusive-training-handouts

 

Read it and weep.

 

Extrapolation Endnote:  The Lincoln, Nebraska school system now must require the purple penguins to call the teacher Buttercream Buffoon instead of Mr./Mrs./Ms Johnson!!

Seen-this-before Endnote:  If someone points their finger into a shape of a pistol then the purple penguin will be called “Boy.”

The People of the “White Privilege” Lie

What do you want? The Truth or a Lie? 

I am a Christian parent of four children. I post this because…

The new/old Jeremiah Wright preachers of hate and exclusion want you to join them in bashing Whites, Jews, Christians, Tea Party members, Capitalism, language and… the First Amendment:

The Annual White Privilege Conference in Madison, Wisconsin 2014.

As you listen to the video below you will hear the devotees of this ‘white guilt’ cult parsing language to reprogram your mind.

 “Some things are believed because they are demonstrably true. But many other things are believed simply because they have been asserted repeatedly,” Thomas Sowell

 …These are the people who will teach your children in public schools.

No Christian should take part in this evil. Christians, rather, must be alerted to the evil crouching at their child’s school door.

 As you will see and hear the White Privilege Conference gives meaning to Hannah Arendt’s once used phrase “the banality of evil.” ‘Normal’ everyday people within these conference walls are invoked to participate in acts of evil against humanity, even against their own humanity and against God-given human rights, human rights not based on the melanin content of your skin.

 All parents with school children must be informed as to the evil going on right under their noses in the class room.

 Here is part 2 of a 4 part series, “White Privilege Conference 2014 Part 2 of 4: Rape Is Not Intrinsically Bad” provided by the website Progressives Today (see below).

Much of what you are hearing today began years ago on college campuses:  “Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End American Debate” by Greg Lukianoff.  Buy this book and read the specifics of how this type of reprogramming of student’ minds with white guilt/white privilege propaganda could grow into a White Privilege Conference

 Here is a post offering quotes from the book:

 Closing the American Mind: Censorship

For more information on the Progressive’s “white privilege” movement, read these posts:

 Shelby Steele: Poetic truths work by moral intimidation – not reason

 Legal Insurrection (H/T for making me aware of this evil)

 Progressives Today

 The book by Shelby Steele:

“White Guilt: How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the Promise of the Civil Rights Era”

Para-Steele: white liberals and their black enablers unleash moral relativism that is corrupting America.

 Save your children: Home School, Home School, Home School!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What do you want? The Truth or a Lie?

added 5-18-2014:

Group think, collectivist hive mindedness:

“When present, these antecedent conditions are hypothesized to foster the extreme consensus-seeking characteristic of groupthink. This in turn is predicted to lead to two categories of undesirable decision-making processes. The first, traditionally labeled symptoms of groupthink, include illusion of invulnerability, collective rationalization, stereotypes of outgroups, self-censorship, mindguards, and belief in the inherent morality of the group. The second, typically identified as symptoms of defective decision-making, involve the incomplete survey of alternatives and objectives, poor information search, failure to appraise the risks of the preferred solution, and selective information processing. Not surprisingly, these combined forces are predicted to result in extremely defective decision making performance by the group.”
(Marlene E. Turner & Anthony R. Pratkanis, Twenty-Five Years of Groupthink Theory and Research: Lessons from the Evaluation of a Theory, 1998, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 105–115.)

 Hannah Arendt’s Warning: the Violence of Hive-Mindedness, Groupthink

 

 

Kalifornia’s Kontempt for Kids

News Flash: Sexual Supremacists have demanded that legislatures in California include gay history in school curriculum:  “The bill, passed on a party-line vote, adds lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people as well as people with disabilities to the list of groups that schools must include in the lessons. It also would prohibit material that reflects adversely on gays.”

Would school material depicting typical families of male and female parents (i.e., natural marriage (which of course is the only way history stays alive)) in school curriculum, be considered offensive to gays?  Of course it will be and soon. The homosexuals will want equal space, wording, etc. in textbooks and time.  A child will be indoctrinated to accept homosexuality as a normal manifestation of sexuality.  They will never be told about the down sides of homosexuality, the obvious one being HIV/AIDS. Instead, children will be taught that angry white men keep homosexuals marginalized and their treatment programs under funded.  In other words, homosexuals are just misunderstood victims.

Teaching children this sexual-lifestyle-based stuff is aggravated sexual abuse of a minor. Discussing these sexual things violate California’s Lewd Acts with Minors, a punishable offense.  If homosexuals want to talk about “Gay History” (with other adults) there are plenty of liberal Liberal Arts colleges that will add this course to their already socially myopic curriculum.

 Read more:

  California’s socially biased bill SB48, a bill that would endorse homosexuals in history books (with disabled person’s history thrown in to help get the bill passed) will supposedly help mitigate the bullying of homosexuals.  Why not just teach the Golden rule:  Love thy neighbor as thy self?

What about the constant barrage of bed-room explicit sexual information being thrown at our school children by the homosexual community?  Do our kids really need to know a historical person’s sexual orientation to be educated about history?  Whatever a homosexual did in history it can be talked about in the classroom without making a sexual denotation.  You know that, don’t you? This sexual indoctrination in the classroom blantanly bypasses the moral teaching of parents and family.  Homosexuals know this.

 Ironically, homo-lifers are the ones bullying the legislature and the public schools to demand that history books include homosexuals, as if sexual orientation mattered to history:  Joe Schmoe, homosexual, invented the Nerf ball holder in 1976; Joe Schmoe is married to none other than to John Doe Schmoe; Mary Schmary, lesbian, drove a U-haul across the Gobi desert to find a vaginal dam and a partner. She was unsuccessful but is remembered for her uncanny sarcasm in the face of extreme odds; Harry Contrary, cross-dresser, marched in a Chicago St. Patrick’s day parade in 20 degree weather wearing only a boa and short-shorts.  He is to be remembered for dedication to our GLBT community and as a victim of Chicago’s winter; ad nauseam.

 The more crap that is placed in our school’s American history books the more we will find the need to flush them down the toilet to meet up with California.

*************

Coming soon to a California school near you:

Sex Education class in middle school:  “The methods and techniques of homosexuality, we will show you how. Make sure to vaccinate your procreation against HIV/AIDS. We are everywhere.”

Biology 101:  “Some men’s bodies were made for men, some women’s bodies were made for women, we will show you how.”

“Masturbators who have changed the course of history,”

“How S&M speaks to us today,”

“A Greek History of Anal Sex,”

“The Physics of Fist F**king,”

“Safe and Feces Free Anallingus,”

“A child’s role in endorsing a liberal Democrat for any office.”

“Saying “Yes” to unions and “No” to individual initiative.”

“A People’s History of Diversity:  man f**king man

“The Little Porno Shop of Honors”

***********************************

Don’t be in denial:  The best antidote for this blatant in-your-face curriculum is to home school or church school our children.  Our children can learn good viable social values being around other Christians.  Letting your children attend a school with this sexual orientation curriculum is to let the world, the flesh and the devil have its way with our kids.