Chicago’s Top Cop Whines, Blames Sarah Palin
February 19, 2013 2 Comments
More of the same. That’s what Chicago’s top cop Garry McCarthy wants ~ more gun control laws in the city that already has the most onerous gun laws in the nation, laws that do nothing to mitigate violence.
McCarthy must be a Democrat. Democrats do the same thing over and over and expect a different result. Well, isn’t that special?
He is also a Democrat because he blames others ~ in this case, Sarah Palin and gun-lobbyists ~ for not giving him his way, the Chicago Democrat Way. Poor, poor baby. McCarthy’s not doing his job and has to blame others for his lack of results.
What a whuss!
From the FOX News article Chicago’s top cop likens gun lobby’s influence to corruption:
“Facing a surging homicide rate and several headline-grabbing murders, Chicago’s top cop is taking aim at lobbyists who he says prevent politicians from implementing more gun control measures.”
and
“Garry McCarthy’s understanding of our Constitution barely qualifies him as a meter maid, never mind the chief of the nation’s third largest police department,” Illinois State Rifle Association Executive Director Richard Pearson said.
and
McCarthy told FoxNews.com he never advocated “getting rid of the Second Amendment.” He said he was making the point that there is popular support for new gun control laws and that lobbyists are stopping elected officials from reflecting the will of the people.
“How is it [special interests] are controlling politicians?” he said. “How are they controlling elected officials? It’s not by popular vote
McCarthy in the past has blamed “government-sponsored racism” and Sarah Palin for Chicago’s gun violence. He has been outspoken in his opposition to handgun proliferation, telling a radio panel last month he equates fewer guns with improved public safety.
How is it that the ongoing popular support for owning guns and protecting oneself is not the will of the people? In fact, the will of the people is expressly stated in the Second Amendment.
God commanded: “Thou shall not kill. Yet, people still kill each other.
One would think that since the almighty God ‘passed’ an absolute law that people would harken to it and obey. But no. People are people. If you want to change people then you must change people’s hearts. Passing stricter laws is ineffective. Nothing can supersede “Thou shall not kill.”
And besides, this belief that government is the answer to a problem comes with its own caveat to hand over more power so as to fix the problem. Chicago’s gun laws prove that government is not the answer and that power corrupts and/or makes one a whiner as the case may be.
None of the gun laws enacted by Chicago politicians have done anything to stop the violence. None of the pressure from anti-gun lobbyists has stopped the violence. The same people will go on marching in the streets demanding an answer and the same people will vote for Democrats. And, it is the Democrats who pass more and more laws that do nothing except to raise your taxes. Keep voting for stupid. Keep marching on behalf of stupid.
“How is it [special interests] are controlling politicians?” Garry, do you mean special interest groups like the Black Panthers? Like Think Progress? Like environmental groups? Like Chicago’s own Jesse Jackson Jr? Like the Fraternal Order of Police lobbying in the media for a pay raise? Is this what you mean?
Man up McCarthy. Do your job. Stop whining. If you want to make a difference in people’s lives then be a leader not a whiner who hides behind a woman’s skirt.





Green with Egalitarianism
January 6, 2013 Leave a comment
After addressing an envelope this morning, I pulled a recently purchased book of postage stamps out of my wallet. The first thing I noticed was the words “Equality Forever” on the stamp I used. The stamp booklet included a series of U.S. postage stamps: “Liberty Forever,” “Freedom Forever,” Justice Forever,” and “Equality Forever.”
“The U.S. flag flies high with stars and stripes! Each stamp represents an important theme in America’s development as a nation: Freedom, Liberty, Equality, and Justice.”
Be aware. The word “Equality” is taking on a new meaning, a meaning proscribed by Obama and the Progressive Left. Equality is now to be understood as “equal outcomes” and not simply as “all men are created equal.”
Since the foundations of this country were laid with the Bill of Rights and the Constitution we have agreed as a nation that “All men are created equal.” This includes and is limited to the God given natural rights of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” afforded to men and women of every race. Beyond that there are no guarantees in life. Life is not fair.
Now when you consider egalitarianism or equal outcomes as “equality” as Progressives do you must by necessity look at what your neighbor has to see if your social-economic status is equal or unequal to that of your neighbor. You will by necessity be looking to see if you are keeping up with the Joneses. You will by necessity be looking to see if grass is greener beyond your own yard. Right? We do this right now without the prompting of government.
But with Obama and the Progressive Left’s ever increasing demands for “fair share” redistribution you are provoked to look with dissatisfaction, with greed and envy, upon your neighbor. You are not encouraged to view your personal situation with contentment. Instead, you are encouraged to look upon your neighbor as a certain class of people above or below you. Obama is in effect telling you to be discontent and to seek “equality” or “equal outcomes” through redistribution of incomes. That is the spiel of Obama and the Progressive Left.
If the spiel is accepted and acted on it will affect every aspect of your life. Consider this scenario:
Two men work as drafters in an engineering company. They were both hired at the same time. Drafter Number One comes to work early, does his work as drafter and back checks his work to ensure its quality.
Drafter number Two comes to work a few minutes before 8:00. He does the work required of him and some of his work requires redrafting. He spends a lot of time talking to his cube mates and on the internet. He also goes outside to have a ten minute smoke break every half hour.
Would it be fair to pay these men the same wage? Egalitarian wages ignore work ethics ~ empirical reality ~ in favor of being…equal. But would paying both men the same exact wages be fair?
I’ll give another example of the folly of equal outcomes from one of my most visited posts: Where Do You Start?
And from the Thomas Sowell Reader, his article Meaningless “Equality”:
For more information about the foolishness of the current use of the word “equality” read Thomas Sowell’s The Quest for Cosmic Justice.
Should government be the arbiter of what is fair? Does government share your values? As we speak Obama is seeking to redistribute monies ~ “spreading the wealth” ~ from the suburbs to the cities to effect egalitarianism.
You work hard to have a suburban home where your kids can go to school. The suburbs provide space for your family to grow. You feel safer out in the suburbs. Your tax money pays for the fire and police, for parks and clean streets and many other benefits. Many black Americans move to the suburbs to be free of the city and its onerous taxes and its crime. Obama is right now taking your tax money and redistributing it to the cities. In other words some of your tax money is not being spent on your home district but it is given to someone else. Is this fair?
The reality of recent redistribution is much grimmer. The truth is that the money taken from you the taxpayer under the guise of “fair share” egalitarian purposes is given to special interest groups that support a certain political party – cronyism.
And in the recent fiscal cliff deal who are the big winners? Not you the taxpayer.
Who are getting tax breaks?
Among others rum distillers, Hollywood film producers and NASCAR! Is this egalitarian?
Finally, should we be looking at our neighbor’s property and demanding that we have the same things, the same wages, and the same health care, the same…? What does Jesus want us to do instead of being green with egalitarianism?
And from the writer of the letter to the Hebrews:
And from the apostle Paul:
Is Jesus being dismissive of our needs? Or, is He realigning our view of our worldly needs in accordance with True values found only in a personal relationship with him. Right now Obama’s Progressive message is directly opposed to God’s message of contentment. Right now Obama wants you to have a personal relationship with government. He wants government to be the theocratic Benefactor much like how most of Europe has chosen government over God. Does the godlessness and socialism of Europe make you green with envy? Green with egalitarianism? I wonder? If so, you are at odds with the God Who is Just and will give to every man as he deserves.
WYSINATI: What you see is NOT all there is.
Our Father in Heaven “Give us this day our daily bread.”
Rate this:
Filed under commentary, Writing Tagged with Christianity, class warfare, contentment, economy, egalitarianism, envy, equality, keeping up with the joneses, Liberlaism, natural rights, Occupy Wall Street, politics, progressvies, social class, U.S. Flag Four Flags stamps